Fwd: [ NOLA_C3_Discussion] Dems Fold on Bush's 9-11 Resolution

[Guest guest]

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Ward Reilly <wardpeace

Sep 15, 2006 8:20 PM

[NOLA_C3_Discussion] Dems Fold on Bush's 9-11 Resolution

cawi , NOLA_C3_Discussion ,

Bush_Be_Gone

Cc: vvaw, campcaseyalumni ,

vetsandsurvivorsmarch

 

 

John Nichols in The Nation 9/15

Dems Fold on Bush's 9-11 Resolution

 

Two days after President Bush used a nationally-televised address to exploit

the memory of September 11 for political purposes – employing language and

logic so crude that it would have made Richard Nixon cringe – the Republican

Congressional leadership tried to plant a campaign yard sign in the wreckage

of the World Trade Center. And the vast majority of House Democrats, lacking

both the courage of their convictions and all other forms of that precious

commodity, gave their assent to the desecration.

 

With the fall election season in full swing, House Republicans tried to take

full advantage of the anniversary of the terrorist attacks on New York and

Washington to suggest that the Congress has been anything more than a

useless appendage of the Bush administration for the past five years. U.S.

Rep. Peter King, R-New York, sponsored a resolution that, while it was

promoted as a commemoration of one of the most solemn dates in American

history, was in fact an apologia for Congressional assaults on civil

liberties such as the Patriot Act.

 

A number of Democrats objected to the clumsy attempt by King and his

compatriots to use the memory of 9-11 to justify their wrongheaded theory

that the only way to fight terrorism is to shred the Constitution.

 

But when it came time to vote, the vast majority of Democrats joined

Republicans in what will go down as one of the cheapest stunts yet in a

Capitol that has seen more than its share of embarrassing behavior.

 

Only 22 member of the House refused to go along with the unseemly charade.

Twenty-one Democrats and one dissident Republican, Ron Paul of Texas,

refused to play politics.

 

Among the handful of House members who did the right thing was Wisconsin

Democrat Tammy Baldwin, who complained that, " The Republican majority

disgracefully politicized what should have been a solemn and sincere

resolution. "

 

Instead of honoring the memory of those who died and recalling the trauma

that the attacks inflicted on the United States, Baldwin said, " [House

Republicans] converted the resolution into an endorsement of the PATRIOT

Act, punitive immigration bills, and other highly controversial measures,

which many of my constituents oppose. The Republicans show enormous

disrespect to the 9/11 victims and families by playing election year

politics with something as solemn as the fifth anniversary of 9/11. "

 

Joining Baldwin and Republican Paul in voting " no " were: Arizona's Raul

Grijalva; Californians Mike Honda, Barbara Lee, Pete Stark and Lynn Woolsey;

Georgians Cynthia McKinney and John Lewis; Illinoisans Danny Davis, Luis

Gutierrez and Jan Schakowsky; Maine's Mike Michaud; Massachusetts' Barney

Frank, Ed Markey and Jim McGovern; New Yorker Maurice Hinchey; North

Carolina's Mel Watt; Ohio's Dennis Kucinich; Oregon's Earl Blumenauer;

Virginia's Bobby Scott; and Washington's Jim McDermott. (An additional

member, Democrat Mike Capuano of Massachusetts, voted " present. " )

 

Unlike most members of Congress, these dissenters actually believe that

their votes matter. And, this week, they used their " no " votes to reject the

exploitation of the memory of 9-11 for political purposes.