CDC Lyme Researchers Implicated

[Guest guest]

http://www.canlyme.com/cdc_implicated_2006.html

 

 

CDC Lyme Researchers Implicated

 

http://www.opednews.com

August 21, 2006 at 11:58:03

 

In the wake of overhauling the FDA, lawmakers are also cracking down

on conflicts of interest within the Centers for Disease Control. Last

month, Representatives, Dr Dave Weldon (R-FL), and Carolyn Maloney

(D-NY), held a press conference to announce the introduction of a bill

that would give responsibility for vaccine safety to an independent

agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, and remove

most vaccine safety research from the CDC.

 

Specifically, they said on July 26, 2006, the " Vaccine Safety and

Public Confidence Assurance Act of 2006, " will create an independent

office to address, investigate, and head off potential safety problems

like the use of mercury in vaccines, in an objective and

non-conflicted office whose sole purpose is vaccine safety and evaluation.

 

According to Dr Weldon in a prepared statement, Federal agencies

charged with overseeing vaccine safety research have failed. They have

failed to provide sufficient resources for vaccine safety research.

They have failed to fund extramural research and they have failed to

free themselves from conflicts of interest that serve to undermine

public confidence in the safety of vaccines, he said.

 

" The American public deserves better, " Dr Weldon stated, " and

increasingly parents and the public at large are demanding better. "

 

" There's an enormous inherent conflict of interest within the CDC, " he

said, " and if we fail to move vaccine safety to a separate independent

office, safety issues will remain a low priority and public confidence

in vaccines will continue to erode. "

 

He said that similar conflicts have been remedied in other federal

agencies, but in the vaccine program the conflicts persist unchecked.

" This bill will provide the independence necessary, " Dr Weldon said,

" to ensure that vaccine safety research is robust, unbiased, and

broadly accepted by the public at large. "

 

" Vaccines do wonders for public health, but when the government

requires them, it must also ensure that they're safe, " Ms Maloney said

in her statement. " We need adequate, unbiased research on vaccines,

and this legislation would deliver that. "

 

She applauded Dr Weldon for his tremendous commitment and leadership

on the issue. " He is truly dedicated, " she said, " to protecting our

children and the public at large. "

 

While announcing the new bill, Dr Weldon and Ms Maloney were joined by

several groups advocating vaccine safety reform, including the

National Autism Association, A-Champs, and safeMINDS.

 

According to the National Autism Association: " This landmark

legislation will provide critical government agency oversight and

implementation of vaccine safety research, which has not kept pace

with the rise in the number of vaccines routinely prescribed to

consumers including pregnant women and young children. "

 

Additionally, the Act calls for $80 million in funding to conduct

vaccine analysis and safety research.

 

Currently the CDC oversees vaccine research, safety and promotion, a

situation that has been drawing more and more public criticism in

recent years. The CDC compiles the list of vaccines that doctors are

to give all children in the US, based on the recommendations of an

advisory panel, and in many states kids can not attend day care or

public schools unless they have received the CDC-endorsed vaccines.

 

A recommendation by the CDC guarantees a huge market for a vaccine and

enables the drug company to use the government as a marketing device

for its product. The annual global market for vaccines is expected to

be over $10 billion this year.

 

On July 21, 2003, United Press International published a report based

on a four-month investigation that found a pattern of problems linked

to vaccines recommended by the CDC, as well as a web of close ties

between the agency's advisory panel and the pharmaceutical industry.

 

By investigating members of an advisory panel of outside experts that

make vaccine recommendations, UPI found that members of the panel

received money from vaccine makers through relationships that

included: sharing a vaccine patent; owning stock in a vaccine company;

payments for research; money to monitor vaccine testing; and funding

for academic departments.

 

In fact, according to UPI, the CDC itself is in the vaccine business.

Under a 1980 law, UPI found the CDC had 28 licensing agreements with

drug companies and one university for vaccines or vaccine-related

products and eight ongoing projects to collaborate on new vaccines.

 

For instance, the CDC and SmithKline Beecham worked together on the

Lyme-disease vaccine. A 1992 CDC activity report, obtained by UPI,

says the agency had an agreement " with SmithKline Beecham that

currently funds three positions at (the CDC) for the purpose of

providing information of use in developing advanced test methods and

vaccine candidates. "

 

In June 2001, the General Accounting Office delivered a report on the

issue to Senator Chris Dodd, (D-Conn), that noted that CDC employees

" are listed on two Lyme-disease related patents " including " a 1993

joint patent between CDC and SmithKline Beecham Corporation. " The

report also said that six of 12 consultants working for the CDC on

Lyme vaccines " reported at least one interest related to a vaccine firm. "

 

According to CDC meeting transcripts where the committee weighed its

recommendation, 3 had conflicts of interest with SmithKlineBeecham.

The LYMERIX lyme-disease vaccine was approved by the CDC on February

18, 1999, and by October of 2000, more than 1.4 million people had

received the vaccine.

 

But 18 months later, according to UPI, in February 2002, SmithKline

Beecham pulled the vaccine off the market claiming that sales of

LYMERIX were insufficient to justify the continued investment.

However, according to UPI, the company also faced hundreds of lawsuits

by people who said they suffered side effects from the vaccines.

 

The government's database at the time, listed possible side effects

from LYMERIX as 640 emergency room visits, 34 life-threatening

reactions, 77 hospitalizations, 198 disabilities and six deaths after

people took the shots since the CDC endorsed it, according to UPI.

 

UPI also found other cases where vaccines endorsed by the panel were

pulled off the market after a number of people suffered devastating

side effects, and some died.

 

Congressman Dan Burton, (R-Ind), had already been investigating the

advisory panel for several years, and told UPI that the conflicts of

interest were a major problem. " This presents a real paradox, " he

said, " when the CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts

of interest to serve on influential advisory committees that make

recommendations on new vaccines, as well as policy matters. "

 

" All the while these same scientists, " Representative Burton said,

" have financial ties, academic affiliations, and other vested

interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to

be providing unbiased oversight. "

 

An August 2001 report on the investigation by Rep Burton's House

Government Reform Committee, stated that " four out of eight CDC

advisory committee members who voted to approve guidelines for the

rotavirus vaccine in June 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical

companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine. "

 

Critic say the conflicts of interest of Dr Paul Offit while sitting on

the advisory panel could not be more blatant. He was part of the team

that mandated the use of the RotaVirus vaccine, even though he

received a $350,000 grant from Merck to develop the vaccine, shared

the patent, and was paid to go around the country teaching doctors

that vaccines were safe, according to the Wall Street Journal.

 

UPI discovered that Merck also had bought and distributed copies of a

book written by Dr Offit titled, " What Every Parent Should Know About

Vaccines, " to physicians with a Dear Doctor letter that stated: " Merck

Vaccine Division is pleased to present you with a copy of the recent

publication, 'What Every Parent Should Know About Vaccines.' "

 

" The authors designed the book, " Merck's letter told doctors, " to

answer questions parents have about vaccines and to dispel

misinformation about vaccines that sometimes appears in the public media. "

 

The book had a list price of $14.95, and Dr Offit told UPI that he did

not know how many copies Merck had purchased.

 

In 2001, Congressman Burton's investigation also found conflicts of

interest with the then chairman of the advisory panel, Dr John Modlin,

a Professor at Dartmouth Medical School, who owned $26,000 worth of

Merck stock.

 

In a phone interview in 2003, Dr Modlin told UPI that he had sold the

Merck stock, but that he had recently agreed to chair a committee to

oversee Merck vaccine clinical trials.

 

" Meeting transcripts over the past decade, " UPI says, " showed that at

some meetings, half of the members present had potential conflicts

with vaccine manufacturers. "

 

For instance, at a June 2002 meeting, four of the 11 members on the

panel acknowledged conflicts with Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck,

Pfizer, Aventis Pasteur, and Bayer. Two of the four conducted research

or vaccine trials and one member was a co-holder of a patent.

 

The agency is currently facing a major credibility crisis over the

issue of whether vaccines containing the mercury-based preservative,

thimerosal, are responsible for the epidemic of neurological disorders

ranging from ADHD to autism in children all across the country.

 

The CDC is being accused of research manipulation and cover-ups of

vaccine maker culpability by an ever increasing number of activist

groups and is also facing tough questions from some of the powerful

members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats alike.

 

The CDC continues to claim that there is no evidence to support a

connection between the epidemic and thimerosal, which they say is no

longer used in most pediatric vaccines.

It is however, included in the flu vaccine currently recommended for

all pregnant women and children more than 6 months old.

 

Earlier this year, a group of lawmakers initiated a new investigation

of the matter and basically directed the CDC to butt out. On February

22, 2006, they stated in a letter: " If the federal government is going

to have a study whose results will be broadly accepted, such a study

cannot be led by the CDC, " in a letter to Dr David Schwartz, Director

of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

 

The letter was signed by Senators, Joe Lieberman (D-Conn) and Debbie

Stabenow (D-Mich), and members of the House Representatives including,

Dr Dave Weldon, (R-Fla) Chris Smith, (R-NJ), Carolyn Maloney, (D-NY),

Dan Burton, (R-Ind), Joseph Crowley, (D-NY), and Maurice Hinchey, (D-NY).

 

The Institute of Environmental Health Sciences is part of the National

Institutes of Health, and was asked to convene a panel to decide how

to analyze the CDC database to determine whether autism rates have

dropped since thimerosal was removed from most vaccines.

 

The controversy picked up traction in April, " National Autism Month, "

when world renowned heavy metal experts, researchers, and physicians

traveled to Washington and rallied on Capital Hill moving the debate

beyond just the parents of autistic children.

 

This spring, a full-page ad appeared in USA Today, the most

widely-circulated newspaper in the US, and accused the CDC of " causing

an epidemic of autism " by recommending that kids receive a series of

vaccinations that contained thimerosal at least as late as 2001.

 

The ad quoted one of the most recent and famous advocates to join the

cause, environmental lawyer, Robert F Kennedy Jr, as saying: " It's

time for the CDC to come clean with the American public. "

 

The ad was funded by a coalition of advocacy groups led by Generation

Rescue, and directed readers to the web site, www.PutChildren

First.org, to view internal CDC documents, many of which were obtained

under the FOIA, that includes transcripts of meetings and e-mails that

the groups contend support their allegations of a CDC cover-up.

 

Congressman Weldon has a theory about why the CDC continues the

charade of denying the link between vaccines and autism. " If it is

eventually determined that an entire generation of kids was

essentially poisoned, " he says, " a class-action suit against the

federal government could be on the order of hundreds of billions of

dollars, and so there's very good reason for them to try to cover this

up. "

 

And Dr Weldon's prediction is proving true. Vaccine injury lawsuits

are being filed and won against the vaccine makers and the government.

Implemented in 1988, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of

1986, established a mandatory, federally administered no-fault claims

process for individuals who allege that they were harmed by the

administration of childhood vaccines.

 

The vaccine compensation fund was created to supposedly ensure an

adequate supply of vaccines, and to stabilize vaccine costs. A small

fee charged on each vaccines funds the program. According to

statistics on the vaccine compensation web site, in fiscal year 2006,

a total of $38.2 million has been paid out in cases involving 47 awards.

 

In what is reported to be one of the largest settlements ever, in July

2006, a quadriplegic boy was awarded $43.1 million. The case alleged

that now 7-year-old, Mario Rodriguez, became a quadriplegic after

receiving a measles, mumps and rubella vaccine on January. 25, 2000.

 

Under the guidelines of the vaccine compensation fund program, the

lawsuit was filed against the Department of Health and Human Services.

Kansas City attorney, Leland Dempsey, who represented the child, told

the Kansas City Star: " One unusual aspect of the case is that Mario is

expected to have a normal lifespan, and therefore will require more

years of care that will cost more money. "

 

" He will need round-the-clock care, including extensive medical

intervention, throughout his life, " Mr Dempsey said.

 

Many other vaccine related lawsuits have been filed against drug

makers. For instance, Eli Lilly, the company that invented thimerosal

back in the 1930s, informed its shareholders in its 2005 Annual Report

filed with the SEC on April 1, 2006: " We have been named as a

defendant in approximately 340 actions in the U.S., involving

approximately 1,020 claimants, brought in various state courts and

federal district courts on behalf of children with autism or other

neurological disorders. "

 

Lilly also stated, we believe that " the majority of the cases should

not be prosecuted in the courts in which they have been brought

because the underlying claims are subject to the National Childhood

Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. "

 

Under the Act, claims must first be brought before the US Court of

Claims for an award determination under the guidelines established by

the Act. However, as Lilly points out in its filing, " Claimants who

are unsatisfied with their awards under the Act may reject the award

and seek traditional judicial remedies. "

 

Persons injured by drug companies can get information at Lawyers and

Settlements.com

 

http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/cdc_big_pharma.html

 

Evelyn Pringle

evelyn.pringle

 

 

 

Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for OpEd News and investigative

journalist focused on exposing corruption in government and corporate

America.