Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens

[Guest guest]

http://www.medicaltruth.com/rife/elecpath.htm

 

 

 

 

Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens

 

by Brian McInturff, aka turf

 

In the early 1900s, Royal Rife discovered that certain lower life

forms could be " devitalized " by subjecting them to certain frequencies

produced by an electrical apparatus. He used a combination of AC and

DC power to do so. He used a powerful dark field microscope, another

device he perfected, which allowed him to watch the effects of his

frequency generator on live viruses, bacteria, paramecium, and other

potential pathogens. He watched as they were devitalized in a number

of ways, either losing their motility, pleomorphing into a different

(and hopefully nonpathogenic) form, or actually bursting.

Unfortunately, most of his work and the exact design of his frequency

generator were lost. This story is detailed in a book called The

Cancer Cure that Worked by Barry Lynes.

 

In a small clinical study during Rife's time, his frequency generator

reportedly had a 100% cure rate for the types of cancers that were

investigated - sarcomas and carcinomas. He also had a perfect cure

rate for other serious diseases of the time, like tuberculosis. The

tale of how this work was almost lost to mankind due to fledgling

pharmaceutical companies and theAmerican Medical Associationis a story

for the conspiracy theorists.

 

Rife's dark field microscope was also an innovation far ahead of its

time. It allowed him to view even the tiniest viruses while they were

still alive by staining them with light, unlike today's electron

microscopes for which the sample must be " fixed " which kills the

pathogen being viewed. With this microscope, he saw and reported

instances of pleomorphism, which is when an organism mutates, as when

a bacterium mutates to a fungal-type lifeform. This was also reported

by Bechamps, another early microscopy pioneer, but is still considered

anathema to the conventional medical establishment, even though

alternative modern researchers working with dark field microscopes

have clear proof that it occurs and are willing to show anyone who

cares to look.

 

The exploration of this phenomenon and that of frequency and other

electrical effects on pathogens will one day rock the scientific and

medical establishments. I will not hold me breathe until this happens,

however.

 

There is little profit, and hence motivation, in developing electrical

modalities to treat disease, especially with devices that one can

build oneself. It will only come about when so many people know about

this treatment, use it, and are more successful using it than with

conventional modalities that it is the preferred method to treat

disease due to cost, safety, and efficacy. This will come through bit

and piece research financed by those how actually need the treatments

for themselves and for diseases that conventional medicine has little

luck in treating. I have no doubt that this would have never happened

had it not been for the internet and its facilitation of instant

uncensored worldwide communications.

 

One factor that may speed progress greatly in this field is the vast

amount of commercial applications that exist for this technology which

are outside the government-protected field of internal medicine. There

is a (rather expensive) " pimple zapper " which uses a single sharp

electrode in one hand (and the box in the other) advertised which

claims to locally kill bacteria which can cause eruptions. There is a

salmonella detector made for egg processing lines which stimulates

eggs with the resonant frequency for the bacteria (ala Hulda Clark's

syncrometer), but with a laser. If it detects resonance, the egg is

kicked out as contaminated. Other potentially very profitable

applications are as a safe pesticide in homes (and perhaps farms) and

as a disinfectant.

 

Lately, James Bare has been working to recreate Rife's work, and has a

book and video showing how to build a generator which approximates

Rife's. His video shows different pathogens succumbing to the effects

of his generator, usually bursting or hemorrhaging from the field

effects from the transmitter, which is 5 or more feet away.

 

The Bare device generates a ~27 MHz AC waveform (with a CB) and

combines with a DC waveform at varying frequencies. The waveform

excites a plasma tube from which the power is transmitted. The high

frequency penetrates the body efficiently, but the antipathogenic

action is thought to be mostly the harmonics caused by the DC portion.

 

Bare's Rife device will not generate high enough frequencies to match

those discovered by Hulda Clark (in the DC portion) to kill pathogens

directly. He must use the harmonics of the frequency generator, and as

such he produces a DC waveform which produces enough harmonics to

generate them.

 

This is an inexact science at this time, and due to fluctuations in

construction, equipment, tube variations, operating technique, results

differ from those building and using the devices, although most admit

when they follow Bare's instructions to the letter, they have the best

results. Once the device is constructed, cautious experimenters test

it on cultures of bacteria, molds, paramecium, etc, to more assure the

device produces a useful wave.

 

The people working with Rife/Bare generators report that it is easy to

tell when a frequency generator is causing harmful effects since pain

will be felt. They have done experiments on lab rodents and reported

that they will not tolerate harmful frequencies without trying to

escape. Even so, incautious experimentation with high voltage devices

can cause damage or even death, so it is critical that one thoroughly

understands the ramifications of dealing with these types of

bioelectronics.

 

The Rife-Bare generator is one of the few types of frequency

treatments where the subjects do not come in contact with the device,

and some report it works as much as 100 feet away (killing fungus).

Other methods that people use to apply frequency to the body include

coils, pads, handholds, and other contact applicators. Coils of wire

can be stimulated with a frequency and produce a field which will

penetrate the body, and some use this method to treat Lyme disease.

Pads or handholds can be used to apply voltage directly to the body.

 

One person reported that he caused possibly permanent nerve and lymph

node damage to himself by applying voltage using a wire coil attached

to a function generator, amplified to 60 volts, and at tapeworm

frequencies as published by Clark. He says he had a tapeworm in a

lymph node which " bubbled up " when subjected to the field, killing it

but damaging his lymph node.

 

Human body cells have a resonant frequency at about 1000KHz, and any

strong DC modulated signal over 330KHz produces harmonics of

significant amplitude in this frequency range. AC signals do not

produce these harmonics, so are probably safer to use, but also do not

work nearly as well when used in a frequency-inspecific manner.

 

Hulda Clark uses an AC frequency generator with handholds to kill

pathogens in the body. Using a device she developed called a

syncrometer, she determined the resonant frequencies of most potential

pathogens in the body and proceeded to kill them with an AC frequency

generator. This list is published in her book called " The Cure for all

Diseases. " The only problem with this method is that the pathogen that

is causing an illness must be accurately identified before treatment,

so that the correct frequency can be used. To run through the entire

list of pathogens and dial in the frequencies for all of them for a

minimum 3 minutes each requires many hours.

 

Clark then came up with a zapper. It is a single frequency generator

which produces DC square waves at about 30KHz. The lowest frequency

given on her list of pathogens is about 80KHz and goes up to 900KHz.

Yet, she reports that the DC wave kills many different pathogens in

the body. She once speculated that this was from the positive offset

DC voltage on the body, but I thought it more likely that the bugs

were still dying from frequency effects from the harmonics produced by

a zapper's square wave.

 

A zapper produces an imperfect 30KHz square wave. A square wave is

composed of an infinite number of higher frequency AC waves. The AC

wave's frequencies and power distribution is analyzed using Fourier

transforms. A perfectly symmetrical square wave produces major odd

harmonics, that is, AC frequencies at 1,3,5,7,9... times its

frequency, and the power available in those harmonics decreases as the

multiplication factor increases. A perfect 30KHz zapper produces power

at 30, 90, 150, 210, 270 ... Khz. It also produces minor even harmonics.

 

However, no zapper built to Clark's specs produces a perfect square

wave. It produces an unsymmetrical square wave. Most of the ones I

have built produce around 16/14 ratio, staying at 8 volts for 16

microseconds, then dropping to 0 volts for 14 microseconds. These

values are approximate. There is also usually a spike on the

positive-going pulse. These " imperfections " however, add to a zapper's

effectiveness. It means that rather than just producing harmonics on

the odd multiples, it produces harmonics all over the place. It is

impossible to analyze theoretically (for me anyway) and tell just what

AC frequencies are being produced.

 

Add to this another uncertainty factor in that no two zappers are

alike when using cheap parts, like from Radio Shack, which have a wide

tolerance. I have seen zappers built with the same parts in the same

board layout produce different frequencies, one at 28KHz and one at

35KHz, e.g. This leads to a great deal of variability between zappers.

For example, the frequency effects of one zapper might be very good at

treating salmonella and not touch e. coli, while another one built

with the same parts might be highly effective against e. coli and not

touch salmonella. There is too much variability. I have one zapper

which seems to work best for flu, but will not work against colds, and

another that performs best for colds.

 

Robert Beck is another researcher in the bioelectronic field. His

" zapper " is a low frequency bipolar device originally designed to

treat HIV. At this writing, it uses a 27V signal at 4Hz, although,

like Clark's zapper, frequency is stated not to be important. Beck

reports that his device does not kill HIV directly, but merely keeps

them from reproducing, which effectively treats them. Even with the

high voltage of Beck's zapper, I think it is unlikely that there is

enough power at the resonant frequency of HIV to kill it, given the

very low frequency. Then again, maybe there is, since viruses are so

small, perhaps it only takes a milliwatt or less at the correct

frequency to destroy them. And, last I read, Beck's device killed 100%

of HIV in 100% of subjects (although this is a far cry from curing

AIDS). But perhaps there is something other than frequency effects

that devitalize HIV from Beck's machine.

 

There are also now being built frequency " guns " which produce a

non-adjustable set of frequencies and are aimed at a specific part on

the body and are modulated by using colored cones on the output. In

the few anecdotes I have seen in their use, they appear to be somewhat

successful in treating cancerous tumors. One person reported that it

did nothing to treat his multiple sclerosis, however, but this is

understandable given Clark's assertions on the causes of MS.

 

I have corresponded with a person who has used frequency generators a

great deal in treating illness. He has used homemade ones, commercial

function generators, standard and modified zappers. I think he

stumbled on to a likely reason the zapper and other frequency devices

work.

 

DNA/RNA are polar molecules and are thus susceptible to frequency

effects. Each DNA molecule has a resonant frequency. In general, the

simpler the life form the lower the resonant frequency of the being

(according to Hulda Clark.) Every cell in a living being has a DNA

molecule (half in sperm and ova) and since the DNA for each species

are the same size, they have the same frequency. When the cells are

subjected to their resonant frequency at sufficient power, they are

destroyed.

 

A zapper with a non-symmetrical waveform provides a limited amount of

power in the resonant frequency of each molecule which contains

DNA/RNA, which is every living cell. When there are a large amount of

the same type of molecule, like in the human body, which is composed

of quadrillions, the amount of energy transmitted to each is so small

that none are damaged (although they could be due to localized effects

of more power being available closest to the electrode site, e.g.).

However, this assumes that there is enough power in the frequency of

those cells, and Clark states that human body cells have a frequency

of above 1MHz. So, if one stays in the lower frequencies and limits

power, there is not enough power in the harmonics at 1MHz and above to

do damage to a human body.

 

If there are a small number of some other type of RNA/DNA, as from a

minor infection of bacteria, the amount of energy available in that

resonant frequency may be enough to destroy the DNA. However, if one

has a excess amount of, say, large parasites in the body, the amount

of energy is not enough to harm them. The power can be cranked up

enough to destroy them, but without knowing the exact frequency at

which the pathogens will destruct, it can be risky since the body

could be damaged.

 

There is another effect from a zapper or other pad device that may as

important as the frequency effects, however. According to the same

guy's speculation, a zapper, or any square wave frequency device,

produces hydrogen peroxide in the blood due to its chemistry. Peroxide

has antipathogenic effects. But this is only produced in the blood.

Still, it would be better to produce it in this manner than ingest it,

since consuming more than a few drops can reportedly adversely affect

beneficial gut bacteria and not be transmitted to the blood stream

intact. He says he can taste the peroxide in his mouth when zapping at

high voltages. Perhaps this is the main benefit from using a zapper

and any frequency effects are minimal.

 

After making this post, someone who was involved in the colloidal

silver manufacturing business wrote that he suspected that many of the

same principles of making colloids also apply to using a zapper.

Colloidal silver is made with a zapper-type device and silver wire or

plates. He explained that oxygen as formed on one electrode, and

hydrogen on the other, as well as the H2O2 and H30, so these could

have an effect.

 

In my experience, zappers are effective for blood borne pathogens but

not in the nasal cavities, intestines, or other places inside which

there is no blood contained. The same limitation probably applies to

all pad or contact devices. Whether it is from the production of

chemicals or actual frequency effects, they need the conductive blood

to work systemically (although there might still be some local effects

that could be put to use.) I think Clark's syncrometer is probably

only effective in detecting pathogens with blood exposure as well.

 

These same limitations apply to variable frequency generator pad

devices, but at least (if a bug can be identified) the exact AC

frequency can be used without having to rely on harmonics. They can

also be used with Rife frequencies for indeterminate pathogens.

 

Bare-Rife generators are the most effective for treating the entire

body and not just the blood, but are most valuable for diseases that

are well researched and discussed. Even if a pathogen can be

identified as causing a malady, experimentation with a microscope is

necessary to determine the correct frequencies to use unless they have

been previously determined. The devices lack the ability to use the

pathogen frequencies Clark published so harmonics must be used, which

makes it an even less exact science because of variations in

equipment. Small variations in construction and usage methods can make

them ineffectual and they should be well tested and the operators well

trained before using them for treatment.

 

I often recommend zappers for use since I am convinced of their

safety. I think that high powered variable frequency tube devices are

better at treating illness, but do not recommend their use except by

those who research and experiment cautiously because of the

possibility of damaging oneself or others. Also, the severity and type

of disease should be taken into account. See my article called Zapper

Tips for suggestions to get the most out of a zapper.

 

Addendum: I have now experimented with a Bare Rife plasma tube

generator for a number of months. The potential impact that this

device will have on the treatment of illness is on par with if not

more than all the prescription drugs thus far patented. Combined.

[Guest guest]

Hulda Clark, the microbiologist, is I think the

current authority on the use of electric current to

kill various bacteria. Yes we can kill even parasites

in our intestines and viruses in liver. But with that,

and for the same reason, our healthy friendly bacteria

in our intestines will also be killed. Right?

Ratan.

 

--- califpacific <califpacific wrote:

 

> http://www.medicaltruth.com/rife/elecpath.htm

>

>

>

>

> Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens

>

> by Brian McInturff, aka turf

>

> In the early 1900s, Royal Rife discovered that

> certain lower life

> forms could be " devitalized " by subjecting them to

> certain frequencies

> produced by an electrical apparatus. He used a

> combination of AC and

> DC power to do so. He used a powerful dark field

> microscope, another

> device he perfected, which allowed him to watch the

> effects of his

> frequency generator on live viruses, bacteria,

> paramecium, and other

> potential pathogens. He watched as they were

> devitalized in a number

> of ways, either losing their motility, pleomorphing

> into a different

> (and hopefully nonpathogenic) form, or actually

> bursting.

> Unfortunately, most of his work and the exact design

> of his frequency

> generator were lost. This story is detailed in a

> book called The

> Cancer Cure that Worked by Barry Lynes.

>

> In a small clinical study during Rife's time, his

> frequency generator

> reportedly had a 100% cure rate for the types of

> cancers that were

> investigated - sarcomas and carcinomas. He also had

> a perfect cure

> rate for other serious diseases of the time, like

> tuberculosis. The

> tale of how this work was almost lost to mankind due

> to fledgling

> pharmaceutical companies and theAmerican Medical

> Associationis a story

> for the conspiracy theorists.

>

> Rife's dark field microscope was also an innovation

> far ahead of its

> time. It allowed him to view even the tiniest

> viruses while they were

> still alive by staining them with light, unlike

> today's electron

> microscopes for which the sample must be " fixed "

> which kills the

> pathogen being viewed. With this microscope, he saw

> and reported

> instances of pleomorphism, which is when an organism

> mutates, as when

> a bacterium mutates to a fungal-type lifeform. This

> was also reported

> by Bechamps, another early microscopy pioneer, but

> is still considered

> anathema to the conventional medical establishment,

> even though

> alternative modern researchers working with dark

> field microscopes

> have clear proof that it occurs and are willing to

> show anyone who

> cares to look.

>

> The exploration of this phenomenon and that of

> frequency and other

> electrical effects on pathogens will one day rock

> the scientific and

> medical establishments. I will not hold me breathe

> until this happens,

> however.

>

> There is little profit, and hence motivation, in

> developing electrical

> modalities to treat disease, especially with devices

> that one can

> build oneself. It will only come about when so many

> people know about

> this treatment, use it, and are more successful

> using it than with

> conventional modalities that it is the preferred

> method to treat

> disease due to cost, safety, and efficacy. This will

> come through bit

> and piece research financed by those how actually

> need the treatments

> for themselves and for diseases that conventional

> medicine has little

> luck in treating. I have no doubt that this would

> have never happened

> had it not been for the internet and its

> facilitation of instant

> uncensored worldwide communications.

>

> One factor that may speed progress greatly in this

> field is the vast

> amount of commercial applications that exist for

> this technology which

> are outside the government-protected field of

> internal medicine. There

> is a (rather expensive) " pimple zapper " which uses a

> single sharp

> electrode in one hand (and the box in the other)

> advertised which

> claims to locally kill bacteria which can cause

> eruptions. There is a

> salmonella detector made for egg processing lines

> which stimulates

> eggs with the resonant frequency for the bacteria

> (ala Hulda Clark's

> syncrometer), but with a laser. If it detects

> resonance, the egg is

> kicked out as contaminated. Other potentially very

> profitable

> applications are as a safe pesticide in homes (and

> perhaps farms) and

> as a disinfectant.

>

> Lately, James Bare has been working to recreate

> Rife's work, and has a

> book and video showing how to build a generator

> which approximates

> Rife's. His video shows different pathogens

> succumbing to the effects

> of his generator, usually bursting or hemorrhaging

> from the field

> effects from the transmitter, which is 5 or more

> feet away.

>

> The Bare device generates a ~27 MHz AC waveform

> (with a CB) and

> combines with a DC waveform at varying frequencies.

> The waveform

> excites a plasma tube from which the power is

> transmitted. The high

> frequency penetrates the body efficiently, but the

> antipathogenic

> action is thought to be mostly the harmonics caused

> by the DC portion.

>

> Bare's Rife device will not generate high enough

> frequencies to match

> those discovered by Hulda Clark (in the DC portion)

> to kill pathogens

> directly. He must use the harmonics of the frequency

> generator, and as

> such he produces a DC waveform which produces enough

> harmonics to

> generate them.

>

> This is an inexact science at this time, and due to

> fluctuations in

> construction, equipment, tube variations, operating

> technique, results

> differ from those building and using the devices,

> although most admit

> when they follow Bare's instructions to the letter,

> they have the best

> results. Once the device is constructed, cautious

> experimenters test

> it on cultures of bacteria, molds, paramecium, etc,

> to more assure the

> device produces a useful wave.

>

> The people working with Rife/Bare generators report

> that it is easy to

> tell when a frequency generator is causing harmful

> effects since pain

> will be felt. They have done experiments on lab

> rodents and reported

> that they will not tolerate harmful frequencies

> without trying to

> escape. Even so, incautious experimentation with

> high voltage devices

> can cause damage or even death, so it is critical

> that one thoroughly

> understands the ramifications of dealing with these

> types of

> bioelectronics.

>

> The Rife-Bare generator is one of the few types of

> frequency

> treatments where the subjects do not come in contact

> with the device,

> and some report it works as much as 100 feet away

> (killing fungus).

> Other methods that people use to apply frequency to

> the body include

> coils, pads, handholds, and other contact

> applicators. Coils of wire

> can be stimulated with a frequency and produce a

> field which will

> penetrate the body, and some use this method to

> treat Lyme disease.

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

Ratan Singh

Phone: 91 141 2652561

Address: 7- NA- 16

Jawahar Nagar

Jaipur- 302004 INDIA

----------

- Certificate in Food & Nutrition;

- Author of " Nutrition & Supplements in Major Mental Illnesses " ;

- M.A. (Psychol), Postgraduate Diploma in Medical & Social Psychology, Ph.D.;

- Certified Behavior Therapist (from late Prof. J. Wolpe's Unit, Temple

University Medical School, Philadelphia, USA);

- Hypnotist, Biofeedback and Meditation Therapist.

- Family, Marital and Sex Therapist.

->Consultant Nutritional & Clinical Psychologist in Jaipur Hospital, India.

psych_58,

www.jaipurmart.com/trade/meditationandhealth,

meditationandcancer-

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

, psych doc

<psych_58 wrote:

>

> Hulda Clark, the microbiologist, is I think the

> current authority on the use of electric current to

> kill various bacteria. Yes we can kill even parasites

> in our intestines and viruses in liver. But with that,

> and for the same reason, our healthy friendly bacteria

> in our intestines will also be killed. Right?

> Ratan.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Clark zapper and some other devices ars supposed to be frequency

specific for different microbes but some electrotherapy devices are

broad spectrum and I wonder if they kill beneficial flora. Other broad

spectrum treatments should also be of concern, i.e. - north pole of a

magnet, magnetic field pulsers, colloidal silver, synthesized chemical

antibiotics, and many herbal antibiotics. Intensive research should be

conducted to determine what benfits good flora and what harms it. PA

 

 

 

 

 

Moderator's Note: Most people think that probiotics, such as Kefir or similar,

should be taken when we do something that may affect our intestinal flora. Many

think that probiotics such as above should be taken all of the time anyway.

[Guest guest]

I made a mistake in my previous post. When I said the zapper is

frequency specific I meant the function generator that Clark

recommends for specific microorganims and parasites is frequency

specific. Ratan was correct, the zapper is broadspectrum and I guess

in a technical sense the type of waveform from a function generator

which Clark recommends have harmonics at higher frequencies which

may make them broadspectrum. And as the moderator pointed out, these

are some of the reasons to take probiotics when using any type of

antibiotic. PA --- In

, " rpautrey2 "

<rpautrey2 wrote:

>

> , psych doc

> <psych_58@> wrote:

> >

> > Hulda Clark, the microbiologist, is I think the

> > current authority on the use of electric current to

> > kill various bacteria. Yes we can kill even parasites

> > in our intestines and viruses in liver. But with that,

> > and for the same reason, our healthy friendly bacteria

> > in our intestines will also be killed. Right?

> > Ratan.

>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>

> The Clark zapper and some other devices ars supposed to be

frequency

> specific for different microbes but some electrotherapy devices are

> broad spectrum and I wonder if they kill beneficial flora. Other

broad

> spectrum treatments should also be of concern, i.e. - north pole of

a

> magnet, magnetic field pulsers, colloidal silver, synthesized

chemical

> antibiotics, and many herbal antibiotics. Intensive research should

be

> conducted to determine what benfits good flora and what harms it. PA

>

>

>

>

>

> Moderator's Note: Most people think that probiotics, such as Kefir

or similar, should be taken when we do something that may affect our

intestinal flora. Many think that probiotics such as above should be

taken all of the time anyway.

>