Vaccinations and medical responsibility

[Guest guest]

Testing should be compulsory, independent, of the highest quality, and published

yearly, if there are no, or unexceptional, changes. Research findings

promoting, or more importantly, prohibiting use, must be published the " instant "

they're recognized.

 

If this ever occurs, it's a scandal that our government allows vaccine

manufacturers to make products available for human use, without the most

stringent testing procedures, and, expect in those cases where disastrous

consequences are anticipated if time is wasted, well in advance of public

distribution. This kind of government pandering to pharmaceutical houses, is

nothing but intentional and criminal negligence.

jp

 

-

Jagannath Chatterjee

;

alternative_medicine_forum ; health_and_healing

; medicalconspiracies (AT) googl (DOT) com ; medicalconspiracies ;

avian2005 ; autism-mercury ;

vaccinations ; eoharm

Friday, July 07, 2006 4:01 AM

Vaccinations and medical responsibility.

 

 

Dear ______group,

 

Some of you all seem as biased towards vaccines as we anti-vaccine

activists seem biased against them. I am a different sort of

anti-vaccine activist, I suffer from vaccine damage. Therefore I need

not leaf through voluminous literature to know that vaccines can be

highly dangerous.

 

I question the very concept of vaccines. Vaccines do not strengthen our

immune system, they simply compromise it by introducing another disease

state. This fact was well brought out by Dr Burnett in his book, " Thuja

as a cure for vaccinosis " . A healthy person, he argued, cannot be made

more healthy with a vaccine. Rather the chemical composition of the

body is changed by introducing diseased puss.

 

(snip)

 

 

New Message Search

Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved

message search.

 

 

 

Share feedback on the new changes to Groups

 

Recent Activity

a.. 31New Members

b.. 10New Links

Visit Your Group