Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 , " Shag Spencer " <shaaag2000 wrote: > Shag, Thanks for posting this. I have a personal horror story and so am acutely aware of how damaging the whooping cough vaccine really is. It is just as dangerous as implicated here and MUCH more!~ Our oldest son who will turn 47 this year, evidently was very susceptible to pertussis (is there anybody who isn't?) for the day following his injection he was afflicted with a very high fever followed by a severe case of the whooping cough in which he literally " coughed " for six months on end resulting in a " collapsed " lung. Thankfully this has healed over the years and the specialists prediction (an early demise in mid-twenties did not materialize). One can only imagine the stress that very young children endure when they are subjected to all this. Just one germ can literally destroy everything we've strived to achieve! He was one of the lucky ones. JoAnn > Vaccinations , " mum2mishka " <mum2mishka@> > wrote: > http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article1164554.ece > > Warning to GPs after research uncovers true extent of whooping cough infection > By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor > Published: 07 July 2006 > > The potentially fatal childhood illness of whooping cough is far more widespread than official figures suggest, researchers warn. > A study of children with persistent coughs lasting more than 14 days in Oxford found almost four out of 10 had recently been infected with the bacterium, Bordetella pertussis, which causes whooping cough. > > More than 85 per cent had been immunised but had still caught the > infection. > Researchers said the vaccine - given to infants at two, three and four > months as part of the childhood vaccination programme - lessened the > severity of the illness, and was important for that reason, but did not > always prevent infection. > > The biggest risk was to younger siblings of school-age children who were > too > young to be vaccinated. Half of infants under one who catch whooping > cough > are admitted to hospital. GPs fail to diagnose the infection in older > children because it is perceived to be a disease of very young children > who > have the classic whoop. > > Around 500 cases of the infection are notified to the Health Protection > Agency in England and Wales each year but the researchers estimate that > the > true figure is " at least 10 times and maybe many more times higher, " > Richard > Mayon-White, consultant epidemiologist at the University of Oxford and > an > author of the study, said. The study suggested the condition was > " endemic > among younger school-age children " . > > The infection, known as the " 100-day cough " , starts like an ordinary > cold > but develops into paroxysms of coughing, sometimes ending with a " whoop " > and > often accompanied by vomiting. The worst affected children require > hospital > treatment and can suffer brain damage or death. > > Before vaccination was introduced in the 1960s, there were annual > epidemics > of between 60,000 and 160,000 cases. A scare about the safety of the > vaccine > in the 1970s saw vaccination rates collapse. In the 1970s and 1980s > there > were 200,000 cases of whooping cough and 100 deaths, a death rate of one > in > 2,000, according to the Health Protection Agency. Vaccination rates > against > whooping cough have since recovered and have remained at 94 per cent for > the > past decade. > > In 2001, a fourth pre-school booster vaccination, given between the ages of three and five, was introduced because of concerns about the persistence of the infection in the community. The vaccine was also changed from a > whole cell to an acellular version, which has fewer side-effects and can be manufactured to a higher standard. > > Writing in the online edition of the British Medical Journal, the > researchers urge GPs to be alert to the possibility of whooping cough in any child with a persistent cough lasting longer than two weeks. " [Our] finding is important because secondary attack rates of pertussis in > non-immunised household contacts have been estimated to be 90 per cent. Younger children are more likely than adolescents to have a new-born sibling to whom they could transmit the infection.'' > > --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.