Guest guest Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Lou Dobbs on the North American Union 4 Minute Video President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the United States as we know it, and he took the step without approval from either the U.S. Congress or the people of the United States. Click here to watch _http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13854.htm_ (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13854.htm) == _http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle & code=COR20060617 & a rticleId=2663_ (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle & code=COR20060617 & art\ icleId=2663) Despite having no authorization from Congress, the Bush administration has launched extensive working-group activity to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada. The membership of the working groups has not been published, nor has their work product been disclosed, despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada. The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005. The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce. The SPP report to the heads of state of the U.S., Mexico and Canada, -- released June 27, 2005, -- lists some 20 different working groups spanning a wide variety of issues ranging from e-commerce, to aviation policy, to borders and immigration, involving the activity of multiple U.S. government agencies. === Robert Parry: The '06 Stakes Just Got Raised _http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/070106X.shtml_ (http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/070106X.shtml) " The narrow margin of the US Supreme Court’s rebuke to George W. Bush on military tribunals highlights the stakes on the table for the November 2006 Congressional elections, " writes Robert Parry. " It is a strong possibility that if the Republicans retain control of the US Congress in the November 2006 elections, Bush will get to fill at least one more Supreme Court vacancy. " === CEOs earn 262 times pay of average worker June 21, 2006, ABC News/Reuters _http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2104151_ (http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2104151) Chief executive officers in the United States earned 262 times the pay of an average worker in 2005. In fact, a CEO earned more in one workday than an average worker earned in 52 weeks, said the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. The typical worker's compensation averaged just under $42,000 for the year, while the average CEO brought home almost $11 million. In 1965, U.S. CEOs at major companies earned 24 times a worker's pay. In recent years, compensation has been a hot issue with shareholders who have been bombarded with news stories about chief executives who are given multimillion dollar bonus and pay packages even if shares have declined. The chief executives of 11 of the largest companies were awarded a total of $865 million in pay in the last two years, even as they presided over a total loss of $640 billion in shareholder value, a recent study from governance firm the Corporate Library, found. === _http://www.apfn.net/MESSAGEBOARD/07-07-04/discussion.cgi.24.html_ (http://www.apfn.net/MESSAGEBOARD/07-07-04/discussion.cgi.24.html) Pentagon " Misplaces " 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS!!! Wed Jul 7, 2004 19:00 64.12.116.205 US Government " misplaces " $3.3 trillion Beyond Enron and WorldCom lies a much bigger scandal: the " misplacement " of over $3 trillion of taxpayers' money by the US government. This story hasn’t gone completely unreported. For example, CBS News quoted Donald Rumsfeld as saying, " according to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. " According to Catherine Austin Fitts, former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), " total undocumented accounting adjustments [...] for the Department of Defense [and HUD for fiscal 1998-2000] amount to a whopping $3.3 trillion, or $11,700 for every American. " More _http://www.anxietyculture.com/cbs.htm_ (http://www.anxietyculture.com/cbs.htm) Pentagon " misplaces " $2.3 trillion " According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. " (Donald Rumsfeld, quoted on CBS News, 29/1/02) Rumsfeld admitted that the Pentagon misplaced $2.3 trillion. This money has disappeared – nobody knows where it's gone. Government officials have blamed the accounting systems – the US Department of Defense has failed to produce independently audited accounts since 1995. See the full CBS News story: _http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml_ (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml) (Note: the full CBS text is also given below) US Department of Defense confirms trillions " loss " The $2.3 trillion figure is confirmed in the following DoD documents (which include transcripts of testimony before the House Budget Committee and a speech by Rumsfeld): _http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2002/n04032002_200204033.html_ (http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2002/n04032002_200204033.html) _http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20010910-secdef.html_ (http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20010910-secdef.html) _http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2002/n02202002_200202201.html_ (http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2002/n02202002_200202201.html) _http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20010711-depsecdef2.html_ (http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20010711-depsecdef2.html) === Weapons in outer space: TENSIONS IN the United Nations over space-based weapons ran to new heights recently when the United States delivered a hard-line statement on its right to develop such weapons. This adds to the alarming change of course last year when the United States became the first country to oppose the annual non binding resolution on Preventing an Arms Race in Outer Space. Essentially the world considers it important to develop a treaty to prevent an arms race in space by prohibiting weapons there. The need for a treaty is compounded by the US withdrawal in 2002 from the ABM Treaty, which had key restrictions on space weapons. _http://tinyurl.com/jvlnb_ (http://tinyurl.com/jvlnb) === Engineers Create Vehicle that Travels from Vancouver to Halifax on a Gallon of Gas June 20, 2006, PHYSORG.COM _http://www.physorg.com/news70040977.html_ (http://www.physorg.com/news70040977.html) A team of engineering students from The University of British Columbia has built a vehicle so efficient that it could travel from Vancouver to Halifax on a gallon of gasoline. The futuristic-looking, single-occupancy vehicle won top prize at a recent international competition, marking the UBC team’s fourth win in as many years. The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Supermileage Competition took place June 9 in Marshall, Michigan. Forty teams from Canada, the U.S. and India competed in designing and building the most fuel-efficient vehicle. “We achieved this level of efficiency by optimizing many aspects of the vehicle design, including: aerodynamics, light-weight construction, a small displacement engine (54 cc), and conservative driving habits,†says Team Captain Kevin Li. The UBC design...achieved 3,145 miles per US gallon. _Supermileage_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_Supermileage_Competition) ...is an annual student competition that challenges students to design, build, and drive a single person vehicle (powered solely by a gasoline engine) to achieve the best fuel mileage possible. The vehicle must be powered by only an internal combustion engine, with no assistance from electric motors or human propulsion. Note: Why don't we see articles like this in the mainstream media? Even if this vehicle is ultra lightweight and has a top speed of only 30 mph, why can't we design heavier, faster cars which get just 10% of what this car got? For answers to this question, see _http://www.WantToKnow.info/050711carmileageaveragempg_ (http://www.wanttoknow.info/050711carmileageaveragempg) === _http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13790.htm_ (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13790.htm) " Insurgents " offer to halt attacks in Iraq By Associated Press Eleven Sunni insurgent groups have offered an immediate halt to all attacks -- including those on American troops -- if the United States agrees to withdraw foreign forces from Iraq in two years, insurgent and government officials told The Associated Press on Wednesday. === _http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/062906LA.shtml_ (http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/062906LA.shtml) Democrats Vow to Block Pay Raises Until Minimum Wage Increased Reuters Tuesday 27 June 2006 Washington - Democrats ratcheted up their election-year push for an increase in the federal minimum wage Tuesday by promising to block a congressional pay hike unless some of the lowest-paid hourly workers get their first raise in nearly a decade. " Congress is going to have earn its raise by putting American workers first: A raise for workers before a raise for Congress, " said Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada. Reid refused to spell out exactly how he will block a $3,300 pay raise scheduled for January 1 for members of Congress, who currently earn $165,200 annually. He said with 40 Senate Democrats backing the maneuver, " We can stop anything they (Republicans) try to do with a congressional pay raise. " Democrats in the House and Senate want the $5.15-per-hour federal minimum wage, in place since 1997, to rise in 70-cent increments to $7.25 by January 1, 2009. In arguing for the minimum-wage increase, Democrats are emphasizing that salaries for members of Congress have risen $31,600 during the time the minimum wage has been frozen. They complain that rising costs for gasoline, utilities, education and food have taken a chunk out of minimum-wage paychecks, which sometimes have to support entire families. ===== In an unprecedented power grab, the FDA has declared that all drug companies are now immune to lawsuits on any drug that has been granted FDA approval. It's the biggest handout to drug companies ever, and the action further establishes the FDA as a rogue agency acting to protect Big Pharma, with no respect for the laws of the land or the safety of health consumers. Read the full, astonishing story at: _http://www.newstarghttp://www.newhttp_ (http://www.newstarget.com/019497.html) == _http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/07/01/social_security/print.html_ (http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/07/01/social_security/print.html) Salon.com July 1, 2006 The president quietly threatens to gut Social Security again, and the timing could be good for Democrats. By Joe Conason (Go to link for entire article.) But pretending to be a fiscal conservative invariably means talking about the anticipated future problems of " entitlement programs " such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Speaking before a friendly audience at the conservative think tank, Bush could not resist congratulating himself for his past effort to " reform " the nation's retirement security program, and vowing that he and the Republicans in Congress would finish the job before he leaves office. His remarks on Social Security are worth quoting in full -- if only because he was so politically reckless as to mention his greatest political failure as midterm elections approach. " As you might recall, I addressed that issue last year, focusing on Social Security reform, " said Bush. " I'm not through talking about the issue. I spent some time today in the Oval Office with the United States senators, and they're not through talking about the issue either. It's important for this country [applause] -- I know it's hard politically to address these issues. Sometimes it just seems easier for people to say, we'll deal with it later on. Now is the time for the Congress and the president to work together to reform Medicare and reform Social Security so we can leave behind a solvent balance sheet for our next generation of Americans. " If we can't get it done this year, I'm going to try next year, " he went on. " And if we can't get it done next year, I'm going to try the year after that, because it is the right thing to do. " For while Bush may have spoken out of turn in a season when politicians prefer not to test voter sentiment on this issue, the privatization struggle is very much on the minds of his fellow Republicans. Naturally the Republicans aren't eager to discuss their Social Security scheme, which the public rejected so resoundingly last year. They are biding their time. For now they will talk instead about terrorism, flag burning, abortion and gays. And if they maintain or expand their majority in both houses, they will proceed to dismantle the most successful government program in history. There is only one way to make sure that doesn't happen. Jane Mayer | The Hidden Power _http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/070506P.shtml_ (http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/070506P.shtml) " Most Americans, even those who follow politics closely, have probably never heard of [David S.] Addington, [Vice-President Cheney’s chief of staff and his longtime principal legal adviser]. But current and former administration officials say that he has played a central role in shaping the administration’ s legal strategy for the war on terror. Known as the New Paradigm, this strategy rests on a reading of the Constitution that few legal scholars share - namely, that the president, as commander in chief, has the authority to disregard virtually all previously known legal boundaries, if national security demands it, " writes Jane Mayer. ===== Number Of Iraqi Civilians Slaughtered In America's War? As Many As 250,000 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11674.htm Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In Bush's War 2539 http://icasualties.org/oif/ The War in Iraq Costs $293,603,112,325 See the cost in your community http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper & Itemid=182 === Not In Our Name: Vietnam, Iraq and the Voters' Pledge By Dan Ellsberg If the war itself was unjust, then all the victims of our firepower were being killed without justification. That's murder. _http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13890.htm_ (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13890.htm) === The US media would have us forget that a threatening new environment was inaugurated by Washington in September, 2002, with a major doctrinal shift announced in its National Security Strategy to a more aggressive policy of pre-emption against merely suspected or potential adversaries. When the US invaded Iraq, the unpredictable Dear Leader predictably asked: “Am I next?†_http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13891.htm_ (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13891.htm) === (http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.