Will Nature, Science Allow Aids Discussion?

[Guest guest]

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/06/23/will_nature_science_allow_aids_d\

iscussion.htm

 

 

 

June 23, 2006

 

 

Will Nature, Science Allow Aids Discussion?

Categories

Epidemics

Science

 

Darin Brown, initiator of the Aids Wiki is asking a very interesting

question: Why is it that scientific media refuse to allow discussion

of the different scientific views that exist on the etiology and the

best treatment modes of Aids? In the article, titled Who Are the Real

AIDS Denialists? – Testing the 'Moore Assertion' Brown cites Prof.

John P. Moore, self-appointed " Major General in the War on AIDS " and

spokesperson for " The Scientific Community. " Moore recently appeared

on the Wiki only to refuse any public debate with the words:

 

" Participating in any public forum with the likes of Bialy would

give him a credibility that he does not merit. The science community

does not `debate' with the AIDS denialists, it treats them with the

utter contempt that they deserve and exposes them for the charlatans

that they are. Kindly do not send me any further communications on

this or any related matter. "

 

 

UnravelingAids.jpg

 

Institute of Science in Society: Unraveling AIDS

 

Please go to Lew Rockwell's site to read the whole article where, in

the end, Brown asks readers to do an experiment: write to the editors

of Science and Nature to ask them to relent and allow discussion of

the obscure points in the Aids story.

 

Although Brown jokingly presents the " Brown/Bialy Conjecture " , arguing

that

 

" No matter how many emails are received by the editors of Science

and Nature in support of the above experiment to test the `Moore

Assertion,' they will never allow such an experiment to take place " ,

 

 

I encourage you to do as I did and try wake them up out of their deep

slumber. Here is the letter I wrote...

 

- - -

 

 

Dear Drs Kennedy and Campbell,

 

with reference to a recent article on the site of Lew Rockwell

 

Who Are the Real AIDS Denialists? – Testing the 'Moore Assertion'

 

I would like to encourage your journals to relent on the long-time

block on discussing controversal issues around the HIV virus, the

tests performed on people to tell them they have " Aids " and the

optimal remedies for the condition of acquired immune deficiency.

 

There is much that has not been said in this debate, and the

assertion that " there is nothing to debate " made by Prof. John P.

Moore, is highly unscientific. It sounds rather dogmatic and circular

in its reasoning, when Moore says

 

" Participating in any public forum with the likes of Bialy would

give him a credibility that he does not merit. The science community

does not `debate' with the AIDS denialists, it treats them with the

utter contempt that they deserve and exposes them for the charlatans

that they are. Kindly do not send me any further communications on

this or any related matter. "

 

For now, the debate takes place on internet discussion groups,

blogs, a wiki and just " normal " sites with the scientific press

refusing to get involved.

 

I propose that you ignore the question at your own peril. Your

magazines will slide futher down the slope towards irrelevance, if

discussion of AIDS etiology and mechanisms of the virus or other

causes for immune weakness, as well as optimal treatment strategies,

including the use of nutritional elements is continually blocked by

the attitude shown by Moore and others, and evidently endorsed by your

publications.

 

Please consider bringing that debate into the public and

especially into the scientific mind, lest we spend another 25 years

without a cure and indeed without a clue as to what is really

happening with this " epidemic " .

 

If you would like to see a selection of the views that are held by

different people, and of the nutritional approaches that have shown

promise in fighting the scourge, just visit my site

 

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/epidemics.htm

 

You will find several links to a wide variety of articles.

Unfortunately these highly interesting and diverse views have no other

forum than the web. You could help in bringing these views to the

attention of scientists, sparking a healthy debate.

 

 

Kind regards

Sepp Hasslberger

 

See also:

 

Darin Brown's Aids Wiki

http://www.reviewingaids.org/awiki

 

Why people still believe HIV causes Aids

http://gnn.tv/threads/16887/Why_people_still_believe_HIV_causes_Aids?page=1#1805\

26

A lively discussion on GNN-TV on the issue of denial and denial of

space to the denialists...

(It was Liam Scheff, one of the posters in that thread, who alerted me

to Darin Brown's article.)

 

 

 

posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Friday June 23 2006

 

 

 

Related Articles

 

'Crystal Meth': Aids Cases Rise in South Africa - Was Duesberg Right?

Under an attention-grabbing headline SOUTH AFRICA: New AIDS threat

looms, Reuters informs us that the Western Cape Province's AIDS

infection statistics just rose by three percent over earlier figures,

saying that a worsening of the AIDS situation in the region is likely.

" According to a 2002 national report on HIV prevalence based on a

sample of more than 16,000 women attending antenatal clinics in the

country's nine provinces, Western Cape... [read more]

June 21, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

SAM-e: Methylating Agent Stops Depression, HIV

In two recent articles based on research done by Cal Crilly,

methylation of the DNA is indicated as a mechanism that controls the

expression of what we call " retrovirus " particles. These are parts of

the human DNA that are mobile and that often have benign functions in

our body processes. See AIDS - Retrovirus Expression Regulated by

Methylation? and Why Retroviruses Appear in AIDS, Cancer and

Autoimmune Diseases. The retrovirus... [read more]

June 11, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Why Retroviruses Appear in AIDS, Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases

Cal Crilly, who recently wrote AIDS - Retrovirus Expression

Regulated by Methylation? published on this site, has now expanded on

his research. The new article, which puts many an official researcher

to shame, delves into important questions such as " what is a

retrovirus " and " why do pregnant women generally test positive for

HIV " . Fintan Dunne, who has done the editing of the article and

published it on his site, says... [read more]

May 30, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Glutathione Peroxidase - Selenium, Aminoacids Overcome AIDS

According to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service " new

clinical reports from Zambia, Uganda and South Africa indicate that

AIDS may be stopped by nutritional supplementation. A number of

members of the medical profession have observed that high doses of the

trace element selenium, and of the amino acids cysteine, tryptophan,

and glutamine can together rapidly reverse the symptoms of AIDS, as

predicted by Dr. Harold D. Foster's nutritional hypothesis. " Yet,...

[read more]

April 26, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Are AIDS, CFS Caused By Oxidative Damage?

The officially supported theory of AIDS as an illness caused by a

continually mutating retrovirus called HIV has not led to progress in

controlling the epidemic in over two decades. We are still looking for

a vaccine but chances are it will never be found. We are still

treating those reacting positively to a non-virus-specific test with

toxic medications, but the results are less than brilliant. The

existence of long-term... [read more]

October 11, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

HIV-Aids: Are Antibodies Good Or Bad?

Jon Rappoport just posted an article that asks an interesting

question: In all germ-related illnesses, when you have developed

antibodies it means your body has been successful in fighting the

disease. You are not going to get sick. Why then is it, that when we

talk about HIV and Aids, the presence of antibodies means something

completely different? Are the standard rules of medical treatment not

valid for Aids? Something... [read more]

August 29, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger