Guest guest Posted June 14, 2006 Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 Adverse Effects of Statins & Heart Drugs JoAnn Guest Sep 17, 2004 21:12 PDT We now know that cholesterol 'contributes' to heart disease ONLY when it becomes 'oxidized', or subjected to free radical damage. Cholesterol damaged by " free radicals " is taken up by white blood cells called *macrophages* and deposited in fatty streaks on artery walls. This fosters " plaque " buildup in the arteries and is key in the development of heart disease. --- Dangers of Prescription Drugs: --- Beta blockers and calcium channel blockers are the mainstay of conventional treatment for heart disease, angina, and even cardiac arrythmias for millions of people. Calcium channel blockers tend to relax artery walls and lower blood pressure by blocking the 'entrance' of calcium into the cells! However, they also block " essential functions " of the heart and blood vessels. In numerous studies, patients taking large amounts of calcium channel blockers had a 60% higher death rate! An effective " alternative " to the calcium channel blockers is MAGNESIUM. Magnesium provides essentially the same effect as popular prescription drugs...relaxation of the smooth muscles of the arteries and 'reduced stress' on the myocrdium, however it works in a much more gentle natural way. Increasing your daily intake of magnesium, potassium and potassium- rich foods may also be effective in preventing arterial plaque from developing. http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Magnesium.html " Beta blockers " are often given to treat high blood pressure: They work by blocking the ability of your heart to respond to epinephrine and adrenaline, which stimulate your pulse rate and blood pressure, elevating both. They are meant to weaken the heart so that blood 'pressure' is *lowered* and heart pain reduced. Beta blockers can be beneficial for 'temporary' relief, but that's not how they're used! Virtually every doctor I know prescribes them indefinitely! Anti-hyperlipidemic drugs (Statins) are given to lower cholesterol levels. These drugs all have dangerous side effects and again, there is little evidence that they reduce the risk of heart attack! Statin drugs such as Mevacor and Zocor are the the most popular of lipid-lowering drugs. They reduce the " production " of cholesterol in the liver and " alter " the way LDL cholesterol enters the cells. According to the " Physician's Desk Reference " (PDR), side effects of these drugs include liver *toxicity*, muscle inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and an increased risk of cataract formation. A significant side effect of statin drugs not mentioned in the PDR is a " reduction " in your body's production of 'Coenzyme Q10'. Co-Q10 is essential for healthy heart muscles. Co-Q10 is more prevalent in your heart than any other muscle in the body!! Colestid and Questran (resins): absorb bile acids from cholesterol in the intestinal tract and cause them to be excreted, lowering cholesterol levels circulating in the blood. Resins have 'considerable' side effects, some of which are constipation, nausea, bloating, and, more seriously, reduced absorption of vitamins A,D, E, and K. Over the long term, these deficiencies may cause bleeding disorders and vision problems! Atromid-S actually INCREASED DEATHS from 'non-cardiac' causes, primarily CANCER! A More Safe Natural Approach: We now know that cholesterol-lowering drugs have dangerous side effects and there is scant research that they lessen the risk of heart attack! There are safe alternatives that address the CAUSES of heart disease, not just the SYMPTOMS! They work to prevent and in some cases even 'reverse' heart disease. A nutrient dense, low protein diet rich in organic fruits and vegetables, a high-potency, antioxidant-rich multivitamin regimen, " essential fatty acid " supplementation along with moderate exercise greatly reduces your risk. www.udoerasmus.com I recommend this program to all patients, not just those with heart disease! -- Researchers: Diet Cuts Cholesterol as Well as Drug Tue Jul 22, 4:21 PM CHICAGO (Reuters) - A strict vegetarian diet can reduce high cholesterol levels about as effectively as cholesterol fighting drugs called statins, Canadian researchers said on Tuesday. --- The diet containing natural plant sterols found in plants, organic vegetables and fruits, almonds, cold-pressed unrefined oil, and viscous fibers found in oats, barley and psyllium, was credited with reducing " bad " cholesterol levels by 29 percent over four weeks in a group of 16 subjects. Another group of study participants who took a daily dose of 20 milligrams of the drug *lovastatin* lowered their cholesterol levels by a comparable 31 percent over four weeks, and a third group on a low-fat diet cut their cholesterol by 8 percent. The findings suggested that patients with high cholesterol try a dietary approach for six to 12 weeks before turning to cholesterol- lowering drugs, Dr. James Anderson, of the University of Kentucky in Lexington, wrote in an editorial accompanying the study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (news - web sites). " Dietary management is an essential part of the treatment for lipid disorders, although adherence to strict and intensive dietary interventions requires motivation by patients, encouragement by physicians, and, perhaps, counseling by dietitians and nutrition experts, " Anderson wrote. High cholesterol is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and statins reduce the risk of mortality from heart-related illnesses by up to one-third. Unfortunately however, there are many documented dangers involved in taking statin drugs. Study author David Jenkins wrote: " Using the experience gained,further development of a more natural dietary approach may provide a potentially valuable dietary option for cardiovascular disease risk reduction in primary prevention. " --- Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 7:01 pm Post subject: Carcinogenicity of lipid-lowering drugs. --- Carcinogenicity of lipid-lowering drugs. Newman TB, Hulley SB. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_uids=8531288 & dopt=Abstract Department of Laboratory Medicine,School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA. OBJECTIVE--To review the findings and implications of studies of rodent carcinogenicity of lipid-lowering drugs. DATA SOURCES- Summaries of carcinogenicity studies published in the 1992 and 1994 Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), additional information obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration, and published articles identified by computer searching, bibliographies, and consultation with experts. STUDY SAMPLE--We tabulated rodent carcinogenicity data from the 1994 PDR for all drugs listed as " hypolipidemics. " For comparison, we selected a stratified random sample of anti-hypertensive drugs. We also reviewed methods and interpretation of carcinogenicity studies in rodents and results of clinical trials in humans. DATA SYNTHESIS--All members of the two most popular classes of lipid- lowering drugs (the fibrates and the statins)cause cancer in rodents, in some cases at levels of animal exposure close to those prescribed to humans. CONCLUSIONS--Extrapolation of this evidence of carcinogenesis from rodents to humans is an uncertain process. Longer-term clinical trials and careful postmarketing surveillance during the next several decades are needed to determine whether cholesterol-lowering drugs cause cancer in humans. In the meantime, the results of experiments in animals and humans suggest that lipid-lowering drug treatment, especially with the fibrates and statins, should be avoided except in patients at high short-term risk of coronary heart disease. Publication Types: Review Review Literature PMID: 8531288 [PubMed --- Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 7:06 pm Post subject: Calcified Plaque burden remains unchanged by Statin drugs --- Relation of aggressiveness of lipid-lowering treatment to changes in calcified plaque burden by electron beam tomography. Hecht HS, Harman SM. Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York 10003, USA. hhe- The comparative effects of more versus less aggressive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering (to </=80 vs >80 mg/dl) on calcified coronary plaque progression by electron beam tomography were evaluated in 182 consecutive asymptomatic patients after 1.2 years of treatment with statins alone or in combination with niacin. Despite the greater improvement in lipids in the </=80 versus >80 mg/dl groups, there were no differences in 'calcified plaque' progression (9.3%/year vs 9.1%/year). We conclude that, with respect to LDL cholesterol lowering with Statins, the " lower is better " theory is not supported by changes in calcified plaque progression. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 12888149 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] _________________ JoAnn Guest mrsjo- http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.