Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

GMW: Altered crops in Europe: At what cost?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

GMW: Altered crops in Europe: At what cost?

" GM WATCH " <info

Thu, 25 May 2006 21:12:37 +0100

 

 

 

 

GM WATCH daily

http://www.gmwatch.org

---

Altered crops in Europe: At what cost?

By Elisabeth Rosenthal

International Herald Tribune, MAY 25, 2006

http://iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/05/24/news/gmo.php

 

ALBONS, Spain Enric Navarro was dumbfounded when the letter arrived

from the testing lab of the Spanish organic farmers association in late

February, informing him that his organic crop contained 12 percent

genetically modified corn. Hearing that his plants had been modified by

biotechnology was almost as traumatic for Navarro as finding they

contained

nuclear waste.

 

For four years, he has lovingly planted hundreds of varieties of trees,

shrubs, flowers and herbs to attract just the right mix of insects so

that he would not need fertilizers or weed- killers on his precious

seven hectares. " If I could not farm organic, I would not farm, " Navarro

said. " I could not sleep at night if I sold that crop. "

 

He burned the corn in the field to rid his farm of what he calls a

" contaminant. " But he does not know how the genetically modified seed

blew

in. He cannot claim compensation for his losses. Also, since pollen

lingers, he is not sure when, if ever, it will be safe to use the

field to

farm organic corn again.

 

As the European Union cracks open the door to genetically modified

crops, Navarro's tale serves as a caution about the risks, scientific

uncertainties and the hazy policies now in place to deal with problems

that

will almost certainly arise.

 

For eight years, Spain was the only EU member state to allow commercial

cultivation of genetically modified crops. In the last 18 months, the

European Commission has approved 11 genetically modified seeds for

planting in the bloc. In 2005, France, Germany, Portugal and the Czech

Republic began planting small commercial plots.

 

The cornerstone of the EU's policy is the political conviction that

genetically altered crops and conventional crops can coexist as long as

proper safeguards are in place - such as keeping a distance between the

two types of fields and imposing a liability scheme for accidents.

 

But scientifically, there are strong disagreements about whether

coexistence is possible, and at what cost.

 

" Coexistence is feasible in the vast majority of places, so long as

farmers talk to each other and cooperate, " agreeing, for example, not to

place GM and conventional seeds of the same crop in adjacent fields,

said Simon Barber of EuropaBio, an industry group in Brussels. Ordeals

like Navarro's, he said, should be rare.

 

But many scientists - not just those with Green credentials - believe

that the small, closely spaced farms of Europe make such coexistence

difficult if not prohibitively expensive.

 

" My experts all agreed that coexistence often just doesn't work, it

isn't possible, " said Chantal Line Carpentier, an agricultural economist

who assembled an independent panel of international experts to study the

issue in North America.

 

The study was requested by Mexico in 2002, after GM corn was discovered

contaminating fields of native crops in Oaxaca, hundreds of miles south

of the United States. Mexico had not permitted GM cultivation, for fear

that the heartier, but more uniform, genetically modified variants

would edge out its dozens of unique strains of maize.

 

That report, " Maize and Biodiversity, " prepared by the North American

Council on Environmental Cooperation, concluded that the GM corn - which

came from the United States - might have a long-term effect on Mexico's

ecology and biodiversity and should be more thoroughly studied and

monitored.

 

The United States and Canada attacked its conclusions. " We are deeply

disappointed that the CEC secretariat has produced a report that ignores

key science about biotechnology, " reads a letter of protest from the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

 

But some farmers believe the report did not go far enough. " Saying that

GM and non-GM farming can coexist is nonsensical, " said Julian Rose, an

organic farmer from England who has helped organize Polish farmers

against modified crops. " It's like saying that noise and silence can

coexist in a room. "

 

The biotech industry considers that " coexistence " has been achieved if

mixing is below 0.9 percent. It argues that foods in the EU could be

labeled GM- free if they contained less than that amount. The concept

infuriates advocates of organic foods, who liken it to allowing a bit of

meat in vegetarian products. But even industry analysts admit that 100

percent GM free foods are not practical once GM farming begins on a

large scale. " Coexistence has become a problem in Europe because some

people want zero percent tolerance, " Barber said. " And that is, quite

frankly, unobtainable. "

 

There are simply too many ways that mixing occurs: Mills grind crops

from different farms, a cookie contains oil made from imported GM soy.

The GM corn in Oaxaca was most likely the progeny of GM ears that had

been legally imported for animal feed, whose kernels had been illegally

used for planting.

 

With so many routes, environmental groups say it inevitably spreads

past the 0.9 percent limit and to areas where it is unwelcome.

 

" When the government of Catalonia says there's no evidence of genetic

pollution, what they mean is they didn't look, " said Anna Rosa Martinez

of Greenpeace in Barcelona. Last year, Greenpeace tested 40 organic

farms, and nearly 20 percent had some level of contamination, from 0.7 to

12 percent.

 

Suzette Jackson, a spokeswoman for Greenpeace International, said: " We

would like to keep Europe as a supplier of non-GM food, and when you

look at countries with a lot of GM crops, it eventually becomes really

hard, or hugely expensive, to maintain regular farming. "

 

Spain allowed GM cultivation in 1998. Twelve percent of corn is now GM

- 50,000 to 60,000 hectares - about half of that in Catalonia.

 

Farmers are free to choose what to plant, but representatives of GM

seed companies now regularly hold dinners touting the benefits of

modified

seeds, which are patented. Some variants produce pesticides, others

have stalks that resist wind or need less water.

 

While some farmers signed on, others - like Navarro - said no,

preferring the independence and quality they see with traditional seeds.

 

Traditional farmers in Mexico, and many in Europe, save seed from one

season's crop to plant the next. It is cheaper and allows selection of

unique varieties. Such replanting is forbidden under the agreement for

GM corn seed that farmers sign with companies like Monsanto and

Syngenta.

 

In 2004, knowing that GM corn was growing in his area, Navarro planted

just a small patch of land to see if he could grow without

contamination. Successful, he later planted two large corn fields.

" But it was very

windy here last fall, " he said, " so perhaps it blew in some stalks from

another field, and contaminated me. I don't know, I will never know. "

 

His two fields are 70 and 100 meters, 230 and 330 feet, from his

neighbors' farms, a distance often deemed adequate to prevent mixing.

But the

GM seed could have come on the wind or on a truck tire, from anywhere.

 

He would like an investigation to prevent a recurrence. But there is no

reliable log of which farmers plant GM seeds in the area, and farmers

are not likely to confess, for fear of being sued.

 

In Denmark, to prepare for GM farming, the government is creating a

liability pool that all GM farmers will have to pay in to.

 

The EU agriculture commissioner, Mariann Fischer Boel, has told EU

states to try to guarantee coexistence, but it is unclear how, or at what

cost. Can farmers afford to maintain buffer zones of 100 meters between

fields? Would it work to create zones specifically designated for GM

crops? Will the GM crops harm the environment?

 

 

 

 

-------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...