Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Defining Chemical Injury

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

This was posted by a member of Chemical-Illnet.

This is only the first part. The whole is at the url.

blessings

Shan

Defining Chemical Injury

http://www.iicph.org/docs/ipph_Defining_Chemical_Injury.htm

A Diagnostic Protocol and Profile of Chemically Injured Civilians, Industrial

Workers and Gulf War

by G. Heuser, M.D.,Ph.D. , P. Axelrod and S. Heuser, M.A.

 

Correspondence to: G. Heuser, M.D., Ph.D. 28240 W. Agoura Road, Suite #203,

Agoura Hills, California 91301, Fax: (818) 865-8814, or P. Axelrod, 2601 N

Street, No. 3, Sacramento, California 95816, (916) 441-4397. IPPH

 

Volume 13, Fall 2000; Pages 1-16 [iSSN # 8755-5328]

 

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

INTRODUCTION

HISTORY

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM

EYES

NASAL AND PULMONARY PASSAGES

GASTROINTESTINAL SYSTEM

SKIN

IMMUNE FUNCTION

ENDOCRINE SYSTEM

REGULAR LABORATORY STUDIES

TOXICOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

CONCLUSIONS

SUMMARY

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ABBREVIATIONS

REFERENCES

 

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

 

Dr. Heuser practices clinical toxicology. He has seen thousands of patients

after toxic chemical exposure and over time developed and used a diagnostic

protocol, which objectively documents chemical injury and impairment.

 

Heuser has published many peer reviewed articles, contributed book chapters,

and has been internationally recognized in his field. He has been invited to

present his diagnostic protocol in Australia, before the German government

(Bundestag) in Bonn, at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm (Sweden), and

before

the Annual Conference of the National Gulf War Resource Center.

 

Patricia Axelrod directs The Desert Storm Think Tank and Veterans Advocate

which is an ad-hoc association of active duty, reserve and retired soldiers,

scientists, and researchers working together to assess the impacts and

consequences of war in general with a specific emphasis on The Persian Gulf War.

Axelrod's work has assisted in American, German and United Kingdom governmental

investigation and reform. Her work has received a Project Censored Award from

the

Sonoma State University, Sonoma, California. She is also the recipient of a

1990-91 John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research and Writing

Grant,which helped seed The Desert Storm Think Tank. Her 1993 ground breaking

article, «Research Guide for Desert Storm Syndrome (International Perspectives

in

Public Health Vol. 10, 1994) has been entered into the records of a number of

U.S. funded committees for the investigation of Persian Gulf War illness,

including those conducted by Senator Donald Reigle, the National Institutes of

Health, and the Presidential Advisory and Oversight Committees. In preparation

for

this article Axelrod traveled to and from post-war Baghdad, Iraq. In addition

she has interviewed and debriefed hundreds of Persian Gulf Veterans.

 

Both Heuser and Axelrod are founding members of the State of California,

Reserve Officer Association committee on Persian Gulf War Illness.

 

Sylvia Heuser is president of EMRIC (Environmental Medical Research and

Information Center) which is based in Dr. Heuser's office and supports all his

research and writing projects with ideas, literature search, and review of

patient

files.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Chemical injury can cause severe, often disabling multi-system complaints,

which may persist for months and at times years after chemical exposure has

ceased. Physicians who see chemically injured patients are frequently baffled

when

they face a patient with multiple complaints, which do not fit into a known

diagnostic disease category. Furthermore, regular laboratory tests (e.g. CBC,

liver function tests, sedimentation rate, urinalysis) are often normal as is a

cursory physical examination.

 

The diagnostic exploration of a chemically injured patient is a new field,

which is difficult for the inexperienced physician. Chemically injured patients

often complain of impaired cognitive and memory functions, intermittent

confusion and disorientation, changes in behavior and mood, word-finding

problems,

sleep disorders, decreased libido and potency. At times they complain of

seizure-like events. They also often report recurrent flu-like symptoms, fatigue

and

exhaustion, malaise, headaches, and chronic pain. Skin rashes,

gastrointestinal complaints, and other health effects may also be present.

Different

patients may react differently to a given chemical or group of chemicals.

 

Toxic effects cannot be objectively evaluated unless every involved system is

studied with advanced and sophisticated methodology. Without benefit of that

process, a chemically injured patient will be dismissed with a diagnosis of

post- traumatic stress disorder, somatization disorder or other labels implying

that «it's all in their heads» [Davidoff, et al., 2000]. The largest patient

population to have received such a diagnosis is that of the Persian Gulf War

Veterans. As of the writing of this article, nine years after the armed

conflict, several hundred thousand veterans still suffer from a host of symptoms

called «Persian Gulf War Illness» which may in large part be due to chemical

injury

[Jamal, 1998; Everson et al., 1999].

 

The authors understand that war time in Iraq exposed people not only to

chemicals but also to uranium 238, a.k.a. depleted uranium, electromagnetic

radiation, experimental vaccines, pyridostigmine bromide, biological warfare

agents,

and diseases and parasites indigenous to the Middle East e.g. leishmaniasis

and brucellosis. Any of these toxins and infectious agents, individually or in

combination, may carry with it a host of health effects. The purpose of this

paper is not to dismiss those impacts but rather to offer currently available

diagnostic techniques which, if applied correctly, will help both patient and

physician assess how a toxic environment alone may contribute to illness

otherwise dismissed as psychosomatic.

 

In this paper we will guide the reader through a diagnostic protocol which

the senior author has developed and used on thousands of his chemically injured

patients. We propose tests and consultations (from experts in their respective

fields) which from our experience and research are most helpful in

documenting and at times quantifying the effects of toxic chemical exposure.

 

In discussing our approach, we will take one organ system at a time, discuss

and select diagnostic tools and tests appropriate to the evaluation of a given

system. Single abnormalities in a single system can have many causes.

Abnormalities in multiple systems can also have many etiologies. However, a

careful

differential diagnosis (using this suggested protocol) will arrive at a tenable

diagnostic impression of chemical injury if multiple objective abnormalities

are found and cannot be explained on any other basis. Thus, a diagnosis of

chemical injury is arrived at in part by exclusion of other diseases, which may

have predated the toxic exposure in question.

 

In the experience of the authors there is no doubt that chemical exposure

(solvents, pesticides, chemical weapons, others) occurred during the Gulf War.

In

this sense, Gulf War Veterans deserve the same careful evaluation which is

indicated in patients who have been exposed to chemicals at home, at work, or

elsewhere (e.g. commuting) here in the USA.

 

The protocol begins with an exhaustive case history, to be followed by a

careful physical examination, laboratory tests, and specialty consultations.

Patient and doctor should seek out consultants who display interest rather than

indifference. Generally an enthusiastic, curious and interested consultant

specialist will be a better member of the evaluation team and bring his or her

methodology to bear when tackling the problem of diagnosing chemical injury. The

evaluation process ends with case definition and a better understanding of the

patient's problems and needs. Most importantly, this process will lay the

foundation for rational and compassionate treatment.

 

This paper does not address the experienced clinical toxicologist. Rather, it

is meant to help the personal physician to follow a road map of investigation

when facing a patient who presents with a history of chemical injury.

 

This paper is also meant to help the educated layperson who has been

chemically injured and is being told that nothing is wrong since nothing

abnormal can

be found (on minimal testing only!).

 

In our experience, both the general physician and the educated patient need a

guide to follow when trying to understand and evaluate a toxic situation.

 

This paper is meant to function as such a guide.

 

The need for a road map is especially urgent since society is pressured by

some of its segments to attach a psychiatric diagnosis to some patients and to

then hospitalize them with that diagnosis.

 

HISTORY

 

Histories as well as the physical examinations are meant to guide the

clinician into the process of a differential diagnosis in which certain

conditions

are tentatively accepted or rejected. Appropriate testing will then follow and

rule in or out conditions and diseases in a given patient.

 

An individual and family history must be carefully obtained from the patient.

Past and present conditions and diseases (incl. those of childhood and

connected with occupation), as well as past and current occupational, incidental

or

accidental chemical exposures should be listed. Short-term memory loss is

present in many patients and therefore at times makes them poor historians. Thus

it is desirable to engage support from family members and significant others to

participate in the history, which may then be more correct and complete.

 

Patients should be encouraged to list what appear to be «allergic» or

«sensitive» reactions to chemical substances, which were previously not

experienced

as harmful. These include chemicals such as gasoline, fumes and perfumes,

household cleaners and other chemicals in everyday use. Reactions to these

chemicals may include skin rashes, hives, eye and throat irritations, sinus

problems,

nausea, dizziness, and flu-like symptoms. These may have developed during the

initial chemical exposure but may also recur when a patient has become

chemically sensitive and now reacts to even low amounts of a given chemical or

chemical mixture. This reaction to low level exposure is called Multiple

Chemical

Sensitivity (MCS) [Cullen, 1987]. If not carefully evaluated, MCS patients will

easily be misdiagnosed as suffering from somatization disorder, post-traumatic

stress disorder or other psychiatric labels.

 

Patients with a history of chemical injury may develop chronic fatigue

[behan, 1996; Bell et al, 1998; Buskila, 1999; Dunstan et al, 1995; Heuser,

1993;

Tirelli, 1998] (incl. Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS),

chronic pain (incl. headaches and fibromyalgia), intermittent dizziness and

faintness (especially after prolonged standing), and other significant and at

times

disabling symptoms. A complete history should list all of the above and all

additional problems the patient has.

 

Patients should also be asked to obtain all existing civilian and/or

Department of Defense and Veteran Affairs medical records for review.

 

In the case of Persian Gulf or other veterans, special consideration should

be given to wartime duties and experiences including: known or suspected

chemical exposures, number of sick bay calls in theater and out, number of times

the

veteran was ordered to don chemical protective gear, and number of

unexplained sightings of dead animals or deceased humans.

 

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patients with a history of chemical injury may develop chronic fatigue

[behan, 1996; Bell et al, 1998; Buskila, 1999; Dunstan et al, 1995; Heuser,

1993;

Tirelli, 1998] (incl. Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS),

chronic pain (incl. headaches and fibromyalgia), intermittent dizziness and

faintness (especially after prolonged standing), and other significant and at

times

disabling symptoms. A complete history should list all of the above and all

additional problems the patient has

 

Go to this link for complete paper

http://www.iicph.org/docs/ipph_Defining_Chemical_Injury.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...