Guest guest Posted May 9, 2002 Report Share Posted May 9, 2002 Thanks Butch Its true many " organic growers " are huge commercial endeavors...farming with tractors and other gas spewing things... As much as I can I buy from local, small farmers who hand cultivate and harvest... Makes such a difference... and also organic " biodynamic " growers certified by the Demeter association... YUM Michelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2002 Report Share Posted May 9, 2002 Thank you for this article Butch To me this is the PERFECT argument as to why more produce than not should be grown organically! Why should it be impossible for me to get pesticide free fruit and vegetables just because a bunch of money hungry s insist on using a dangerous products that are poisoning our food chain? Frankly it disgusts me! *Smile* Chris (list mom) http://www.alittleolfactory.com Butch Owen wrote: > Hi y'all, > > Seems even the so-called Organic products are not totally safe. But > then, I doubt if breathing the air in most places is either. > > Y'all keep smiling, Butch http://www.AV-AT.com > ---------------- > Study Finds Far Less Pesticide Residue on Organic Produce > > By MARIAN BURROS > > [T] he first detailed scientific analysis of organic fruits and > vegetables, published today, shows that they contain a third as many > pesticide residues as conventionally grown foods. > > The findings, published in the Food Additives and Contaminants Journal, > confirmed what consumers of organic food have taken for granted but did > not settle the argument over whether organic food is safer than > conventional food treated with chemical pesticides. > > The debate gained prominence in February 2000 when John Stossel, a > correspondent on the ABC News program " 20/20, " reported that testing had > proved that the levels of pesticide residues in conventional produce > were similar to those in organic produce, making organic claims a fraud. > Though Mr. Stossel retracted his statement -- such testing had never > been conducted -- his report alarmed proponents of organic agriculture > and those like Consumers Union who do not oppose the use of synthetic > pesticides but want stricter standards. > > Edward Groth III, a senior scientist at Consumers Union and a co-author > of the report, said: " There have been some very strong opinions voiced > about organic produce that haven't been based on data and have confused > the issue. This report shows rather convincingly and compellingly that > organic foods are much less likely to have any residues; that when they > have residues they have fewer and that the levels of the residues are > generally lower. " > > The findings are based on pesticide residue data collected on a wide > variety of foods by the United States Department of Agriculture from > 1994 to 1999, tests conducted on food sold in California by the state's > Department of Pesticide Regulation from 1989 through 1998, and tests by > Consumers Union in 1997. The combined data covered more than 94,000 food > samples from more than 20 crops; 1,291 of those samples were organically > grown, about 1.3 percent. > > The Agriculture Department data showed that 73 percent of the > conventionally grown foods had residue from at least one pesticide and > were six times as likely as organic to contain multiple pesticide > residues; only 23 percent of the organic samples of the same groups had > any residues. > > The California data found residues in 31 percent of the conventional > food and 6.5 percent in the organic. Consumer Union tests found residues > on 79 percent of the conventional samples and 27 percent on the organic. > > FULL ARTICLE: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/08/science/08PEST.html? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2002 Report Share Posted May 9, 2002 Reminds me of when I was in Japan outside of Tokyo and saw veggie gardens in the medians between busy city streets. It was also the smoggiest city I have ever visited, and I have been to LA -- Butch Owen <butchbsi Organization: Superonline Thu, 09 May 2002 12:11:33 +0300 OT: Reasons to Grow Your Own Garden Hi y'all, Seems even the so-called Organic products are not totally safe. But then, I doubt if breathing the air in most places is either. Y'all keep smiling, Butch http://www.AV-AT.com ---------------- Study Finds Far Less Pesticide Residue on Organic Produce By MARIAN BURROS [T] he first detailed scientific analysis of organic fruits and vegetables, published today, shows that they contain a third as many pesticide residues as conventionally grown foods. The findings, published in the Food Additives and Contaminants Journal, confirmed what consumers of organic food have taken for granted but did not settle the argument over whether organic food is safer than conventional food treated with chemical pesticides. The debate gained prominence in February 2000 when John Stossel, a correspondent on the ABC News program " 20/20, " reported that testing had proved that the levels of pesticide residues in conventional produce were similar to those in organic produce, making organic claims a fraud. Though Mr. Stossel retracted his statement -- such testing had never been conducted -- his report alarmed proponents of organic agriculture and those like Consumers Union who do not oppose the use of synthetic pesticides but want stricter standards. Edward Groth III, a senior scientist at Consumers Union and a co-author of the report, said: " There have been some very strong opinions voiced about organic produce that haven't been based on data and have confused the issue. This report shows rather convincingly and compellingly that organic foods are much less likely to have any residues; that when they have residues they have fewer and that the levels of the residues are generally lower. " The findings are based on pesticide residue data collected on a wide variety of foods by the United States Department of Agriculture from 1994 to 1999, tests conducted on food sold in California by the state's Department of Pesticide Regulation from 1989 through 1998, and tests by Consumers Union in 1997. The combined data covered more than 94,000 food samples from more than 20 crops; 1,291 of those samples were organically grown, about 1.3 percent. The Agriculture Department data showed that 73 percent of the conventionally grown foods had residue from at least one pesticide and were six times as likely as organic to contain multiple pesticide residues; only 23 percent of the organic samples of the same groups had any residues. The California data found residues in 31 percent of the conventional food and 6.5 percent in the organic. Consumer Union tests found residues on 79 percent of the conventional samples and 27 percent on the organic. FULL ARTICLE: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/08/science/08PEST.html? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.