Guest guest Posted February 21, 2002 Report Share Posted February 21, 2002 Butch- Well once again I will not be popular, oh well, never was as important as being able to think for myself. (Remember you can hit delete at anytime). During the Viet Nam war I lived at Ft Harrison, which at that time did all the military pay, for all branches of the service. I have been gone a long time, but I think they still do it at that finance center altho the base is closed and is now a state park in Indiana. My nephew just got his Captains bars, made the family proud he did. Well his mama was dirt poor when he was growing up. Probably cause her full time job was working at the local Boys & Girls club. I am sure the pay there was not one to allow for extra's. The boys father well I recollect he saw his son 3 times in the boys life. Great role model. Of course while she (the mama) was doing that (working at the Boys Club) she was taking classes to get a college degree. The boy, never had lots of extra clothes or toys, oh there was a bike and a TV. Doc, his uncle gave him a tennis racket and taught him to play. He spent his time playing baseball, basketball, later golf, tennis, lots of team sports. The boy grew up in a " project " environment, never did drugs altho his best buddies went to prison for dealing. When he got out of HS he did get some financial support, not much at 30 on military pay he is still paying his school loans, went to the local Big Ten Campus school and go a degree in P.E. Everyone thought he was gonna be a teacher. Well in many ways he is. He just left. Ft Bragg, now in Oklahoma, then 6 weeks in Kansas, then on for two years in Korea. Paid enough, as a officer he has a room mate, another officer, they split the rent, pool their food allowance, found that shopping at " Sam's Club " food is cheaper than at the commissary. The married couples I have know in the military qualified for food stamps in most states where they lived. It is real easy to set on the sidelines be pacificist and say don't pay them any more. The get 3 squares and a cot. MY opinion we provide prisoners more dollars per person for basic care than we do the military. Well when you have a son, daughter, grandchild, niece, nephew, loved one in the military then you will take an interest...and my opinion that will come about sooner than you think. These young people, and being too old myself to even join the reserves myself, most of the world is younger than me, deserve a decent living wage, they deserve to be able to have a family, Uncle Sugar and I disagree on this one, they deserve to be able to see to it their kids eat, have the clothing they need, not everything they want, without having to have everything come from Goodwill, Salvation Army or such places. Y'all love Butch, do you think he would be the same guy if he had stayed in " Butcher Holler " , slaughter hogs, married and had 9 young'uns and never left the farm? (Sorry Butch, just used you as an example, I still have kin that did just that and I love them for the people they are.) The military gave him opportunity, education and so much more. Yes there is the risk our sons & daughters will die while on duty. There is the risk their younger siblings will be shot at school, crossing the road, climbing a tree, or by one of their " friends " or neighbors. I love eo's, making eo candles, cooking, baking, arranging Grandma's old china and crystal on the table for a family meal, but I thank the powers that be we have a military, a country, a government and Doc, (the wonderful old Irishman in my life) that I have the opportunity to do it. We have our priorities screwed up, in my opinion, we pay, all the sports figures BIG MONEY. Do they risk their lives for us? for our safety, no for our entertainment. Ok I will stop for now, I wonder what it will take for us to pay the people who truly make a difference to us in this world, teachers, military, police, fire, emts. Well I am sure I will long be ashes in the wind before this world sees what is of value in the world in which we live. Seems we only appreciate what we need. Butch, I appreciate you more than I can express, because you bring to our attention things that are real and only when we place our attention on it can it change. Think I will go smell some rose otto, and start to sort more of Granny's things to send to the younger family members... life seems to grow short, time goes by so fast, pray our service people civil and military have some peace in their lives every day. >Hi y'all, > >Dr. Chuck Woodfield passed this to me .. we share a comraderie only a >few can understand. I wanna share it with you. This discussion is >NOT about politics .. it is about TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN!!! > >Some of you may recall on another list lately a lady began to discuss >some hot shot politico opposition to military pay raises ... and the >list mom cut her off ... said it was political. Perhaps it was as it >did focus on particular anti-military elected officials - this doesn't! > >Though its not AT related, we are not robots and this is not a formal >classroom setting. I think such discussion has far more value than what >EO to use to keep meeses out of the kitchen or skeeters from biting our >butt. Why? Because it is your fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, >grandkids and cousins we're talking about here and anybody who thinks >paying a young person $1,500 a month basic salary is reward enough to >get them to lay their butt on the line .. they're in Never Never Land. > >The $110 a month they pay for paratroopers is, I'll admit, a lot of $$. >In fact, its twice what we were paid when I gradualte from jump school >back in December 1963 .. maybe a $55 raise for jumping out of perfectly >good airplanes over hostile territory in 39 years is too much - huh? > >And the $110 combat zone pay is 367% more than the $30 a month we got >during my first tour in the 'Nam .. back when I was too damn young to >vote or buy a beer but not too old to go to the jungle and mountains and >eat monkey brains with Montagnards. > >Granted .. Uncle Sugar does give the single soldiers three slops and a >flop .. but you wouldn't wanna live like that long. And there is a >small allowance paid to married soldiers .. but its not paid for being >married .. its paid cause you aren't taking Uncle Sugar's three slops >and flop anymore .. you provide your own for yourself and your family. >Thankfully, long gone is the mentality of " If Uncle Sugar wanted you to >have a wife he would issue you one. " > >We understand that its not the money so much that brings young troops >into the military .. and that is what these left-wing, anti-military >congressional a.holes who oppose military pay raises hang on to when >they try to put it down. Is this not exploitation? If someone were to >focus on a particular racial or ethic group and exploit them for any >reason we would be up in arms. But some folks can tolerate elected >officials exploiting an entire generation of patriotic young Americans. > >They see no need to spend money improving living standards for folks who >are probably gonna join anyway .. besides, such folks normally vote >conservative so its better to direct funds to the professional loafers. >Give them more welfare so they can buy more crack. The loosers aren't >gonna vote conservative and helping them to raise their children to be >professional crack-using, baby-making welfare recipients, keeps a good >stash of liberal voters and appeases those who leaning that way now - >those who wanna stick a flower in every gun barrel and a stash of cash >in the hands of every crack-head. > >I say again .. regardless of your particular stand on politics, we are >talking about your children, your brothers and sisters, your grandkids, >your cousins and your friends. Screwing with the individual soldiers is >not the proper way to voice dissent against the military. > >Again .. its NOT about politics .. but about TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN!! > >Thank God for Patriots .. Butch >---------------- > > From the February 21, 2002 edition - ><http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0221/p03s01-usmi.html>http://www.csmonitor.com/2\ 002/0221/p03s01-usmi.html > > >Wanted (badly): More Green Beret Recruits > >By Patrik Jonsson | Special to The Christian Science Monitor > >FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - Wanted: Someone who can move undetected through >jungle brush. Prefer a person who can strike with the force of a > " lightning bolt. " Must be able to swim long distances in boots >and heavy clothing. Ability to order food in Arabic optional. > >This is the gist of a recruiting pitch the Pentagon is putting out as it >looks for the next generation of its elite soldiers, the Green Berets, >to fight the terrorist wars of tomorrow. > >In a bold attempt to capitalize on a surge of patriotism and buttress >its aging corps, the Pentagon is offering application forms to the >man-on-the-street for the first time since 1988. And, like NBA scouts at >the start of highschool basketball season, recruiters are fanning out >across the country in search of 400 men with the right stuff to wear the >green beret. > >The elite fighting division had, for years, filled its ranks by >headhunting the best and brightest volunteers from the Army. But the >depth of talent just isn't there anymore. > > " They're going to be looking for the captain of the football team and >the guy everyone looked up to in high school, " says " John, " a >broad-chested Green Beret from Miami, filling out his gear bag at Ranger >Joe's surplus shop on Bragg Boulevard here. " Believe me, there are >undiscovered naturals all over this country. " > >Tactical linchpins > >The Green Berets are even looking for volunteers willing to transfer >from Navy, Marines, and Air force divisions. Perhaps at no other time, >analysts say, has the military's focus shifted so dramatically from >tanks and cannons to the kind of all-round American troops largely >credited for the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan. > > " There's been some reconsideration, if you will, a tailoring of the >future concept of our tactics in war, " says Dan Smith, chief of research >at the Center for Defense Information in Washington. " This training and >recruitment for special forces is along those lines. " > >In a speech at National Defense University in Washington last month, >Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted that more of what the Army >often calls " military occupational specialists " are needed. > > " The department has known for some time that it does not have enough ... >[of] certain types of Special Operations Forces, " Mr. Rumsfeld said. > >Green Beret forces today number about 6,000, spread out from Bosnia to >the Philippines. They are an intelligent, strong, and lethal band of >brothers, all young men, whom the administration has pegged as >the most likely choice of spear tip for what appears to be a protracted >stab at terrorists outside the US. > >Their jobs include rallying and training local militias, gathering > " intel, " and tromping through jungles and deserts. These troops are >seen by many as the epitome of American ingenuity and self-reliance. > >Are you tough enough? > >Which is why only half of the recruits actually make the grade. After >basic training at Ft. Benning, Ga., the new civilian recruits come here >to Ft. Bragg, America's largest Army base, to undergo three weeks of >rucksack marches and intense psychological tests. > > " They'll do stuff like put you on guard duty for three days straight, to >see what you're made of, " says John, the Special Ops soldier from Miami. > >Once accepted, a special forces trooper isn't built overnight. In fact, >it takes 80 weeks to build a civilian duffer into a lean, mean fighting >machine, as able to engage enemies on the ground as make jokes in >Tagalog. > > " What you need is a combination of stamina, physical endurance, and >mental toughness, " says Capt. David Connolly, a spokesman for the US >Army Recruitment Command at Ft. Knox, Ky. > >While some soldiers showed surprise at the Army's new tack, others saw >it coming. > > " The Army has only been shrinking, and that means that the pool of >capable soldiers has also been shrinking, " says David, a retired special >forces sergeant who, in the 1960s, taught the mountain-dwelling >Montagnards to fight the Vietcong. > >The move also comes at a time when the Army is vying to revamp its >soldier schools to appeal to today's tech-savvy teens. At the JFK >Special Warfare Center and School here at Ft. Bragg, for instance, top >brass are now jazzing up their linguistics curriculum to incorporate >state-of-the-art language software. > > " A lot of our guys are getting older and retiring, and we're trying to >find ways to appeal to the next generation of soldiers, " says Tim Loney, >the commander of Charlie Company, which runs the school. > >Pay incentives have also been mooted. The base salary for a battle-ready >soldier is about $1,500 per month. (Food and lodging are free.) > >Soldiers get $110 if they're " jumpers, " and another $110 for serving in >a combat zone. There are also marriage allotments that can run as much >$400 a month. > >But a pay raise may accompany the US Department of Defense's proposed 21 >percent increase in the fiscal year 2003 budget for the US Special >Operations Command - which oversees the Green Berets. > >Underwhelming response > >But will Americans, emboldened, perhaps, by patriotic fervor, enlist? > >To some, the new gambit is the first real chance for Americans to join >the war effort. Up to this point, however, there has not been a crush of >civilian volunteers at recruitment offices. Some critics wonder if >the Army will have trouble filling its ranks. > > " What has not happened since 9/11 has been an increase in actual >recruits, " says Mr. Smith of the CDI. > > " I have watched the Army's reports about an upsurge in calls, but they >tend to be mostly old fogeys wanting to reenlist or people calling to >express their support. " > >Top brass stress that Americans now have a chance to support their >country. > > " The president has said that now is the time to step forward and do your >time, " says Army Lt. Col Ryan Yantis. " A lot of people who come to the >Army come for the adventure, but, today, what's overriding that is the >sense of service to country. " ¸..·´¨¨)) -:¦:- ¸.·´ .·´¨¨)) ((¸¸.·´ ...´ -:¦:- Janet -:¦:- -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 21, 2002 Report Share Posted February 21, 2002 Hi y'all, Dr. Chuck Woodfield passed this to me .. we share a comraderie only a few can understand. I wanna share it with you. This discussion is NOT about politics .. it is about TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN!!! Some of you may recall on another list lately a lady began to discuss some hot shot politico opposition to military pay raises ... and the list mom cut her off ... said it was political. Perhaps it was as it did focus on particular anti-military elected officials - this doesn't! Though its not AT related, we are not robots and this is not a formal classroom setting. I think such discussion has far more value than what EO to use to keep meeses out of the kitchen or skeeters from biting our butt. Why? Because it is your fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, grandkids and cousins we're talking about here and anybody who thinks paying a young person $1,500 a month basic salary is reward enough to get them to lay their butt on the line .. they're in Never Never Land. The $110 a month they pay for paratroopers is, I'll admit, a lot of $$. In fact, its twice what we were paid when I gradualte from jump school back in December 1963 .. maybe a $55 raise for jumping out of perfectly good airplanes over hostile territory in 39 years is too much - huh? And the $110 combat zone pay is 367% more than the $30 a month we got during my first tour in the 'Nam .. back when I was too damn young to vote or buy a beer but not too old to go to the jungle and mountains and eat monkey brains with Montagnards. Granted .. Uncle Sugar does give the single soldiers three slops and a flop .. but you wouldn't wanna live like that long. And there is a small allowance paid to married soldiers .. but its not paid for being married .. its paid cause you aren't taking Uncle Sugar's three slops and flop anymore .. you provide your own for yourself and your family. Thankfully, long gone is the mentality of " If Uncle Sugar wanted you to have a wife he would issue you one. " We understand that its not the money so much that brings young troops into the military .. and that is what these left-wing, anti-military congressional a.holes who oppose military pay raises hang on to when they try to put it down. Is this not exploitation? If someone were to focus on a particular racial or ethic group and exploit them for any reason we would be up in arms. But some folks can tolerate elected officials exploiting an entire generation of patriotic young Americans. They see no need to spend money improving living standards for folks who are probably gonna join anyway .. besides, such folks normally vote conservative so its better to direct funds to the professional loafers. Give them more welfare so they can buy more crack. The loosers aren't gonna vote conservative and helping them to raise their children to be professional crack-using, baby-making welfare recipients, keeps a good stash of liberal voters and appeases those who leaning that way now - those who wanna stick a flower in every gun barrel and a stash of cash in the hands of every crack-head. I say again .. regardless of your particular stand on politics, we are talking about your children, your brothers and sisters, your grandkids, your cousins and your friends. Screwing with the individual soldiers is not the proper way to voice dissent against the military. Again .. its NOT about politics .. but about TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN!! Thank God for Patriots .. Butch ---------------- From the February 21, 2002 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0221/p03s01-usmi.html Wanted (badly): More Green Beret Recruits By Patrik Jonsson | Special to The Christian Science Monitor FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - Wanted: Someone who can move undetected through jungle brush. Prefer a person who can strike with the force of a " lightning bolt. " Must be able to swim long distances in boots and heavy clothing. Ability to order food in Arabic optional. This is the gist of a recruiting pitch the Pentagon is putting out as it looks for the next generation of its elite soldiers, the Green Berets, to fight the terrorist wars of tomorrow. In a bold attempt to capitalize on a surge of patriotism and buttress its aging corps, the Pentagon is offering application forms to the man-on-the-street for the first time since 1988. And, like NBA scouts at the start of highschool basketball season, recruiters are fanning out across the country in search of 400 men with the right stuff to wear the green beret. The elite fighting division had, for years, filled its ranks by headhunting the best and brightest volunteers from the Army. But the depth of talent just isn't there anymore. " They're going to be looking for the captain of the football team and the guy everyone looked up to in high school, " says " John, " a broad-chested Green Beret from Miami, filling out his gear bag at Ranger Joe's surplus shop on Bragg Boulevard here. " Believe me, there are undiscovered naturals all over this country. " Tactical linchpins The Green Berets are even looking for volunteers willing to transfer from Navy, Marines, and Air force divisions. Perhaps at no other time, analysts say, has the military's focus shifted so dramatically from tanks and cannons to the kind of all-round American troops largely credited for the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan. " There's been some reconsideration, if you will, a tailoring of the future concept of our tactics in war, " says Dan Smith, chief of research at the Center for Defense Information in Washington. " This training and recruitment for special forces is along those lines. " In a speech at National Defense University in Washington last month, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted that more of what the Army often calls " military occupational specialists " are needed. " The department has known for some time that it does not have enough ... [of] certain types of Special Operations Forces, " Mr. Rumsfeld said. Green Beret forces today number about 6,000, spread out from Bosnia to the Philippines. They are an intelligent, strong, and lethal band of brothers, all young men, whom the administration has pegged as the most likely choice of spear tip for what appears to be a protracted stab at terrorists outside the US. Their jobs include rallying and training local militias, gathering " intel, " and tromping through jungles and deserts. These troops are seen by many as the epitome of American ingenuity and self-reliance. Are you tough enough? Which is why only half of the recruits actually make the grade. After basic training at Ft. Benning, Ga., the new civilian recruits come here to Ft. Bragg, America's largest Army base, to undergo three weeks of rucksack marches and intense psychological tests. " They'll do stuff like put you on guard duty for three days straight, to see what you're made of, " says John, the Special Ops soldier from Miami. Once accepted, a special forces trooper isn't built overnight. In fact, it takes 80 weeks to build a civilian duffer into a lean, mean fighting machine, as able to engage enemies on the ground as make jokes in Tagalog. " What you need is a combination of stamina, physical endurance, and mental toughness, " says Capt. David Connolly, a spokesman for the US Army Recruitment Command at Ft. Knox, Ky. While some soldiers showed surprise at the Army's new tack, others saw it coming. " The Army has only been shrinking, and that means that the pool of capable soldiers has also been shrinking, " says David, a retired special forces sergeant who, in the 1960s, taught the mountain-dwelling Montagnards to fight the Vietcong. The move also comes at a time when the Army is vying to revamp its soldier schools to appeal to today's tech-savvy teens. At the JFK Special Warfare Center and School here at Ft. Bragg, for instance, top brass are now jazzing up their linguistics curriculum to incorporate state-of-the-art language software. " A lot of our guys are getting older and retiring, and we're trying to find ways to appeal to the next generation of soldiers, " says Tim Loney, the commander of Charlie Company, which runs the school. Pay incentives have also been mooted. The base salary for a battle-ready soldier is about $1,500 per month. (Food and lodging are free.) Soldiers get $110 if they're " jumpers, " and another $110 for serving in a combat zone. There are also marriage allotments that can run as much $400 a month. But a pay raise may accompany the US Department of Defense's proposed 21 percent increase in the fiscal year 2003 budget for the US Special Operations Command - which oversees the Green Berets. Underwhelming response But will Americans, emboldened, perhaps, by patriotic fervor, enlist? To some, the new gambit is the first real chance for Americans to join the war effort. Up to this point, however, there has not been a crush of civilian volunteers at recruitment offices. Some critics wonder if the Army will have trouble filling its ranks. " What has not happened since 9/11 has been an increase in actual recruits, " says Mr. Smith of the CDI. " I have watched the Army's reports about an upsurge in calls, but they tend to be mostly old fogeys wanting to reenlist or people calling to express their support. " Top brass stress that Americans now have a chance to support their country. " The president has said that now is the time to step forward and do your time, " says Army Lt. Col Ryan Yantis. " A lot of people who come to the Army come for the adventure, but, today, what's overriding that is the sense of service to country. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.