Guest guest Posted October 2, 2004 Report Share Posted October 2, 2004 Hi Penel, > Regarding hara diagnosis, I don't understand your question. > > In the shiatsu tradition we two study the object is to find which of > the Elements the client is most jitsu (excess) and most kyo > (deficient). One can attempt to sedate the most jitsu but the most >effective method suggested by Masunaga is to attempt to tonify the >most kyo. It may be possible to feel the " relative relationships " between the elements within the client/patient's body. However, I am a bit skeptical since I have found that the " touch " (and sometimes it is much more than a touch) of the practitioner often (probably always) evokes a response - which may (probably is) different than the client/patient would naturally be when " not touched " . In other words, the act of " touching " immediately changes the condition from what it was before the client/patient was touched. The efficacy and reliability of " diagnosis " is an interesting subject all on his own. Regards, Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2004 Report Share Posted October 3, 2004 Having worked through more sophisticated interpretations of abdominal diagnosis I have found it pragmatically useful to stay with the original one based on Nei Ching, or at least the one which is more simple: On Ren: From Ren 15 to Ren 2 supero-inferiorly: HT - ST - SP - [K - Ren 8 in the umbilicus - K] - SP - K - BL. All of Rt abdomen - LU; all of Lt abdomen - LV. I've found the raised-indurated-gummy-hard-cordlike indicators more pertinent than hollowed-emptied-soft ones to match to treatment points. Oddly the HT markers at Ren 15 and 14 are often hard, but dissipate more quickly than the comparatively softer ones at ST and SP and BL areas. A notoriously stubborn marker is the 'pencil' lying athwart ST area which refuses to budge, as though it's cousin the SP is calling the shots in terms of Damp retiscence. This area is less often hollowed. The K area from Ren 5.5 to Ren 3 is almost always hollowed, and never or hardly even indurated or raised. The Rt and Lt abdomen I take as a whole and not by the Toyohari or by Zhang organ distribution and call LU and LV indicators. I always look for Matsumoto's LV and LU Stagnation points at ST 27 on both sides, this is approximate, she is far more astute in looking for things. And as often find these. By and large anything on lateral aspects of abdomen does not figure in the classical hara; whatever found being ascribed more to a Dai mess up than anything else. I do get by with releases a fair amount of time, and back up the findings with pulse changes, I am an incorrigible pulse beast. As often the tongue is a good indicator of a release. The one illness this delicately effective approach does not help, at least with me, is migraine, for which I use a conventional approach, with some manipulation. At no time does any needle settle in more than 0.1 mm. Would love feedback. Dr. Holmes Keikobad MB BS DPH Ret. DIP AC NCCAOM LIC AC CO & AZ www.acu-free.com - 15 CEUS by video. NCCAOM reviewed. Approved in CA & most states. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.