Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 The recent threads on " Shaoyang pivot " and " My Background " I found somewhat disheartening. Actually potentially a useful topic, if people were up to a reflective discussion at the level of, say, psychological meta-analysis. Notable, admittedly also (perhaps better, mainly observed) in my own reactions and participation, were levels of attachment, difficulty in letting go of positions, arguments, perceived slights, misunderstandings, etc. (As seen with the carry-on of the " My Background " thread even after Attilio attempted to call a truce.) So, getting back to a theme which appeared tangentially a month or two ago. Namely using the theory and insights from CM (TCM, CCM -- whatever your own favorite flavor) to help elucidate medical problems as seen from the perspective of WM/scientific medicine. I ran across a fascinating article in today's (Tu.21.Sept.2004) New York Times, Science section, titled " Connecting the Symptoms, From Skin to Joints to Abdomen " , which I have taken the liberty of downloading from the internet and posting as a file to this forum (in both MS-Word-97 and flat-text formats). It's about a syndrome called " Henoch-Schonlein purpura " , and a number of curious aspects in its presentation. I.e. (abstracted from the article) abdominal pain; excess red blood cells but no white in urine; rash on the legs; " strange " small lesions on the ankles; intestinal petechiae; joint problems; sometimes follows an infection, usually a sore throat or a cold; seems to be an autoimmune problem, etc. The challenge, if I may, would be to find interpretations of the phenomena surrounding " Henoch-Schonlein purpura " which can be " explained " , or at least expressed in some (any) aspect of Chinese traditional theory. Maybe transmutations in ShangHanLun theory. Maybe gongxiapai (attacking and purging school). Or Luo-vessel wei-ying disharmony invading the divergent channel system (auto-immune). Or BiWeiLun/BuTuPai….To name a few which immediately spring to mind. Maybe we could explore alternative scenarios here (and as coexisting viewpoints, without rancor). I will probably offer some thoughts, after some study and contemplation. PS. the conclusion of the article - the doctors were happy with a confirmed diagnosis: Henoch-Schonlein purpura, but " a disease that can still puzzle as it challenges us to connect the spots " - reminds me of a quotation I used to write on the board at some point in the course of teaching medical terminology classes: " Just because your doctor has a name for your condition, doesn't mean he knows what it is! " (source unknown) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 I've posted the NYT article under the file " Case Studies " on the Group site, in two formats: 20040921_NYT_Connect_Sx.doc -- MS Word 97 (from Windows/NT OS) 20040921_NYT_Connect_Sx.txt -- in " flat-text " format, readable in any word-processor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.