Guest guest Posted September 11, 2004 Report Share Posted September 11, 2004 Acubriefs Review and New Citations August 2004 To view this newsletter online (and this month's New Citations), visit http://www.acubriefs.com/citations/08.04.citations.htm From the Editor: Are you ready for the Nobel Prize in acupuncture research? Well how about one for clinical acupuncture research? I vote this year for the work of Andrew Vickers. Readers of Acubriefs know that I can be quite critical of current acupuncture research, whether it has favorable or unfavorable results. I've even argued publicly that current research may do more harm than good. After reading the current articles by Vickers et al, I feel refreshed - like someone on a Sunday morning who hears the message of Easter preached. Vickers' approach to clinical acupuncture research resonates with truth. It is a primary template for research in clinical acupuncture for the foreseeable future. The study design honors acupuncture as an adjunctive form of therapy and avoids the " either/or " approach of conventional randomized control trials. It recognizes context beyond the diagnosis, pill, or procedure. Though Vickers's paper didn't bring tears to my eyes, as might the sight of well-placed needles, there's beauty in his work. It's a beauty of hard steel and precision that turns our head as it passes by. His recent papers are representative of a paradigm shift in acupuncture research. Seven years after the NIH conference we are at the dawn of pragmatic acupuncture trials. Like a new art form, there will be critics and those who hold fast to the comfort of the past. But there is a movement, albeit sometimes circular, that must begin to propel forward. Like the helix of life, our research designs must do a better job of revealing the contextual nature of clinical acupuncture. I am going to encourage readers to appreciate this art form directly. The article is published online at the British Medical Journal's home site. Acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care large, pragmatic, randomized trial. Vickers AJ, Rees RW, Zollman CE, McCarney R, Smith CM, Ellis N, Fisher P, Van Haselen R.; BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):744. Epub 2004 Mar 15. (Full text at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7442/744 ; PubMed Abstract with links to free full text article at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dop t=Abstract & list_uids=15023828 ) If the appeal and power of the first study wasn't enough, Vickers is the second author with David Wonderling of: Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomized trial of acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care. Wonderling D, Vickers AJ, Grieve R, McCarney R.; BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):747. Epub 2004 Mar 15.; (Full text at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7442/747; PubMed Abstract with links to free full text article at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dop t=Abstract & list_uids=15023830 This is a jewel of a study and could be the best example I've seen of an acupuncture intervention evaluated for cost effectiveness. The product is not only sleek and powerful the price is right! What is more, Vickers makes it clear that he is concerned about what the data actually reveals. There is a recent Vickers article that reviews a common statistical problem related to using simple before-and-after statistical comparisons in clinical trials associated with pain. Here again, Vickers emphasizes the need for context to be appreciated when evaluating acupuncture and its use in conditions associated with chronic pain. By reassessing four previous acupuncture trials, he admonishes: if the severity of baseline pain, and other characteristics of the distribution regarding the population's pain levels over the course of the study are not taken into account, the choice of the statistical test and the power of the study can be compromised, along with its conclusions. I predict this paper will also significantly change the landscape of future clinical acupuncture trials and meta-analyses thereof. The article is entitled: Statistical Reanalysis of Four Recent Randomized Trials of Acupuncture for Pain Using Analysis of Covariance. Vickers, A.J.; Clin J Pain 2004 Sept-Oct;20(5):319-23 PubMed Abstract at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dop t=Abstract & list_uids=15322438. So, I am calling for a celebration! Recently The Best of Both World's Foundation, http://www.acubriefs.com/bbw/, was established to support the work of Acubriefs and other efforts aimed at integrating acupuncture and other models of health care into our western system. I would like it to help celebrate the work of Vickers and other acupuncture researchers. Please consider making a contribution, of either your time or your money, to this charitable foundation. All contributions earmarked for celebrating research accomplishments will be honored as such. I'm envisioning a wingding of a celebration that will bring together researchers from all over the world. We might not duplicate the Nobel Prize ceremonies but in our way we can strive to surpass them. James K. Rotchford MD, MPH, Editor New Citations August 2004 = 92 You may view the August 2004 New Citations at: http://www.acubriefs.com/citations/08.04.citations.htm Beginning January 2004, Acubriefs Newsletter is being published 4 times a year. However, we will continue to publish monthly lists of recent citations so that you may view the current additions to the Acubriefs Database. You may search the entire database at our Search Page at: http://www.acubriefs.com/search.htm Acubriefs Newsletter has three objectives: 1. To provide a centralized resource for reviewing new citations on acupuncture in English. 2. To provide annotated abstracts on citations of particular interest to clinicians and researchers. 3. To facilitate access to citations quoted/reviewed. (Please let us know if you have suggestions on how we might better meet these objectives) The editor for the newsletter is J.K. Rotchford MD, MPH, Past President of the Medical Acupuncture Research Foundation. At Acubriefs.com, we invite readers to: Comment on Acubriefs reviews Read comments others have made Email reviews to friends Search the Acubriefs Database for similar articles Search the Acubriefs Review Database for past reviews Submit references to our database, using our online form, or by email to admin @2004 Acubriefs Newsletter; Verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in any medium for any non-commercial purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. For commercial use, contact info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.