Guest guest Posted May 29, 2004 Report Share Posted May 29, 2004 In a message dated 5/29/04 10:03:34 AM, rfinkelstein writes: << Personally, I think that time is well spent learning " energetic sensitivity " . I practice Qigong and Tai Chi but I think there are many other ways. This type of training in schools may be more worthwhile than memorizing point protocols. Just a thought. >> I couldn't agree more with this statement. My own method of study has been the form called Body-Mind Centering®, which studies the 'mind' of different organ systems, cells, and subcellular components through hand-on work and movement. I studied all this before entering TCM school. It has been shocking and dispiriting to me that so little of the educational time at school (I'm in my last year now) has been spent opening students to their own knowing and providing experience and guidance in energetic sensitivity. As a third year student I was dismayed that my classmates giggled when we were taught to put stethoscope to the chest. Apparently being close to breasts and nipples (even male) made people really nervous! It's understandable, I don't blame the students, but I think the school is terribly remiss in not teaching and modeling appropriate understanding of touch and the issues surrounding it. All the memorization in the world is not worth much if the practitioner doesn't have personal integration and understanding of energy, touch and all the boundary issues that come up when working one-on-one with another human being. -roseanne s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2004 Report Share Posted May 29, 2004 Hi Roseanne, First of all - nice to meet you. :-) I believe that all of asian medicine first arose out of a deeper understanding of the energies of the body - through meditation, qigong, yoga, tai chi type practices. From this deeper understanding, came the different notions on how to maintain health and bring people back to goo health. However, it appears that the government in China, back in the 70s, sought to remove all of these understandings and replace them with a more mechanical view of the universe. I am not sure why. Probably, it is easier to control people who have a very machanistic, deterministic view of things. But in my studies, I have found that much of the energistic approaches are still maintained in non-TCM asian approaches - e.g, Japan, Tibet, India, Vietnam, the Mark Seem Tri-City school, etc. My guess is that TCM has received the most attention because China is heavily marketing it as an export product, and has " packaged " it so that it can be exported easily - both as an educational product and as physical products. There is nothing necessarily wrong with this. People assimilate what they can assimilate and TCM may be it for now. Overtime, it may change and more of the energetics may be brough back in as people look for deeper understandings. We shall see. :-) Thank you very much for your response. I enjoyed reading it. Regards, Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2004 Report Share Posted May 29, 2004 Hi. While I agree that being more sensitive to the energies, substances, tissues, processes etc. could only be a good thing, and a truly adept energy worker must have this I guess, I think the basics (point-channel location-function etc., anatomy-physiology) needs to be embedded in the mindstream of everyone using this medical system or branches of it, esp when guiding one's qi. Because when merging with the body/energy of another being, the awareness and imagination cease being two separate operative centers, and join in the natural experience of the exchange or transfer and add to the impulse or urge to heal (moving -adding-reducing-cooling-warming-adjusting tissues etc, its really kind of magical if viewed from other human interaction). The more you know and feel (without one's ego or self in the way) the better. I'm glad to hear people say about the actual level of involvement in this branch, that is, their subjective connecting with the micro areas of the body-connecting with the tissue or flow of blood or energy-- really into it. A landscape where size, personal boundaries, and past barrier conditioning doesn't apply. Where your mind or healing awareness is in your fingertips or the edge of your qi field which penetrates your patient pleasantly(here again reality and imagination are interdependent). It used to be a 'higher' training, but that old-ways stuff takes too long, and today's pace is different. These days is its better to develop someone that demonstrates a knack for it, and other signs. Possibly it is a societal flaw or a defense, that we tend to be so unfeeling, but I'm not sure this can always be taught. I know it can't. It is asking a lot to break someone and have the time to put them back together. It might take everything you have to get through it, I'm not good with words though. sorry. ra6151 wrote: In a message dated 5/29/04 10:03:34 AM, rfinkelstein writes: << Personally, I think that time is well spent learning " energetic sensitivity " . I practice Qigong and Tai Chi but I think there are many other ways. This type of training in schools may be more worthwhile than memorizing point protocols. Just a thought. >> I couldn't agree more with this statement. My own method of study has been the form called Body-Mind Centering®, which studies the 'mind' of different organ systems, cells, and subcellular components through hand-on work and movement. I studied all this before entering TCM school. It has been shocking and dispiriting to me that so little of the educational time at school (I'm in my last year now) has been spent opening students to their own knowing and providing experience and guidance in energetic sensitivity. As a third year student I was dismayed that my classmates giggled when we were taught to put stethoscope to the chest. Apparently being close to breasts and nipples (even male) made people really nervous! It's understandable, I don't blame the students, but I think the school is terribly remiss in not teaching and modeling appropriate understanding of touch and the issues surrounding it. All the memorization in the world is not worth much if the practitioner doesn't have personal integration and understanding of energy, touch and all the boundary issues that come up when working one-on-one with another human being. -roseanne s. Membership requires that you do not post any commerical, swear, religious, spam messages,flame another member or swear. http://babel.altavista.com/ and adjust accordingly. If you , it takes a few days for the messages to stop being delivered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.