R: R: R: not sure about my diagnosis!

[Guest guest]

Dear Pete, what I wish to explain is that if physically present masses,

these should be investigated using western medical imaging techniques.

Ecography as ultrasound diagnosis, could be done with the 2 methods

abdominal (external) & transvaginal/intravaginal (internal). A physically

present mass should be investigated by allopathic medical doctor as it could

be a sign of benign or malignant change. The investigations would be done

by a radiologist usually (even though this investigation uses sound & not

x-rays). All points be covered before you start treatment, so you end up

treating what you think you are treating & not ovarian cancer for example,

which your px doesn't realise she has, & you 'cover' yourself by not missing

anything. I had an useful help in writing these words; thanks again for the

help.

 

Thank you all again,

(Gabriele in Italy is a male name!)

 

 

 

-----Messaggio originale-----

Da: Pete Theisen [petet]

Inviato: giovedi 29 aprile 2004 22.09

A: Chinese Medicine

Oggetto: Re: R: R: not sure about my diagnosis!

 

 

Hi Gabriele!

 

Are you palpating the inside of the vagina (which cannot be safely done in

the US except by a gynecologist, and not even then - lawyers, you know),

or

using some instrument?

 

At 02:58 PM 4/29/2004, you wrote:

> " Impression that hard masses come and go " it is different from feeling a

>mass/masses. If you feel a mass, at least ecographic control is needed;

in

>these cases that kind of method (intravaginal) is more fine and precise

than

>abdominal one. Is it more clear?

>Thank you for your attention and courtesy,

>

> -----Messaggio originale-----

> Da: Pete Theisen [petet]

> Inviato: giovedi 29 aprile 2004 15.27

> A: Chinese Medicine

> Oggetto: Re: R: not sure about my diagnosis!

>

>

> Hi Gabriele!

>

> I get the impression that the hard masses come and go and move from

place

> to place, that's why I said ashi points if there were any. I don't

> understand you on " was made an ecographic control? Best as

transvaginal

> ecography. " Please explain that part. Thanks.

>

> At 07:15 AM 4/29/2004, you wrote:

> >Hi. About the " hard mass " (masses?) in the iliac fossa: was made an

> >ecographic control? Best as transvaginal ecography. Stagnation of QI,

>could

> >mean consequent stagnation of XUE, risulting as fibromas or cysts; if

>toxic

> >Heat is present (RE or TAN/RE), could be worse.

> >Regards,

> >

>

> Regards,

>

> Pete

>

>

>

> Membership requires that you do not post any commerical, swear,

religious,

>spam messages,flame another member or swear.

>

>

>http://babel.altavista.com/

>

>

> and

adjust

>accordingly.

>

> If you , it takes a few days for the messages to stop being

>delivered.

>

>

>

>

 

>---------

-

>--

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Gabriele!

 

I understand you, do you understand me? If there is a mass today and it is

gone tomorrow it does not need an expensive test. If the same mass was here

two weeks ago, but not last week - it is a problem, but it is not malignant.

 

At 10:54 AM 4/30/2004, you wrote:

>Dear Pete, what I wish to explain is that if physically present masses,<snip>

 

Regards,

 

Pete