Re:Women with breast cancer have low vitamin D levels, scientists disco

[Guest guest]

We found, through an e-friends recommendation, a fantastic D3 product. It is

" D3ZO " from www.lifelinknet.com. It is 25,000 IU's of D3 per small capsule

(not like the honking big dry tablets in all the common D3 in drug and

big-box stores) and it has 15 milligrams of Zinc Orotate in it. While the

amount of zinc is not all that much, it is significant that it is orotate,

probably the best form you can take. It is about $20 plus shipping (no

gouges on that shipping) per 30 capsule bottle.

 

I ordered 2 bottles initially and there were 4 when it came. Curious, I

called them. They were having a 2-for-1 deal on it and it was set to expire

that day. I quickly ordered 5 and got 10. Sorry, that deal is gone now, but

the product may be worth every cent at normal price because...

 

We think we killed most of her cancer back in the summer. We had signs that

her cancer was Inflammatory Breast Cancer but we will never be able to prove

that. We used so many protocols, including Oleander, that her entire life

was just one big regimented protocol.* After several weeks of the oleander,

her system rebelled at it. We actually took that as a good sign. We still

have plenty in the fridge.

 

However, her tumor simply got very hard and stopped changing shape. She had

until recently been taking 6000 IU's of D3 but shortly after starting on the

D3ZO, and I mean maybe 10 days, I began to detect very slight changes in her

tumor. It seemed just ever so slightly smaller. We racked our brains for

what might have caused this and settled mostly on the D3ZO. There were other

protocol changes, but this one seemed to fit the time line best.

 

She started taking 50,000 IU's daily (2 capsules) several days ago.

 

I examined it yesterday and it puzzled me; all I could say to her was that

somehow it feels less " harsh " and I can't explain it better than that yet.

Another thing that has happened- when she previously took a hot shower or an

hour long hot clay bath (she does that twice a week), the left breast would

swell badly. It seems not to be doing that as much now. In profile, the

bulge of the tumor is not as much as it was.

 

That's about all I can say for now. Hope it helps someone else. Lack of D3

is highly implicated in Breast Cancer and we learned that very early on but

we had no idea back then that 50,000 IU's is not at all dangerous nor did we

know about this very fine product and company.

 

*I know that some propose to not mix protocols, to pick one and stick with

it. Sorry, but I'm a shotgun man, sawed off at that. When danger is close,

you may not have time to take aim with a rifle. If she really did have IBC,

we didn't have much time.

 

DaddyBob

[Guest guest]

Hi Daddy Bob,

 

Very interesting post. I have been taking 6,000 - 10,000 i.u.s D3 for six

months or so. (Just did 2nd Vitamin D Hydroxy-25 test but don't have

numbers back yet.) Is there any concern that one could have any negative

reactions to 50,000 - 100,000 i.u.'s of D3 daily? Those levels of Vitamin

D3 sound like what Doctors give of D2 intrevenously for very short

durations.

 

Are you following Hydroxy-25 levels by testing? If so how often is she

testing?

 

Any concern about too much calcium absorbtion? Is she tracking calcium

levels?

 

Is there a limited time frame for taking this high a dose of D3 ?

 

Sorry for all the questions but think your post could have huge payback for

cancer patients. Appreciate any additional insight you can offer and

especially looking for further observations and followup in the coming

weeks/months.

 

Good Luck & Good Health,

 

Del

-

<ransley

<oleander soup >

Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:44 AM

Re:Women with breast cancer have low vitamin D

levels, scientists disco

 

 

> We found, through an e-friends recommendation, a fantastic D3 product. It

> is

> " D3ZO " from www.lifelinknet.com. It is 25,000 IU's of D3 per small capsule

> (not like the honking big dry tablets in all the common D3 in drug and

> big-box stores) and it has 15 milligrams of Zinc Orotate in it. While the

> amount of zinc is not all that much, it is significant that it is orotate,

> probably the best form you can take. It is about $20 plus shipping (no

> gouges on that shipping) per 30 capsule bottle.

>

> I ordered 2 bottles initially and there were 4 when it came. Curious, I

> called them. They were having a 2-for-1 deal on it and it was set to

> expire

> that day. I quickly ordered 5 and got 10. Sorry, that deal is gone now,

> but

> the product may be worth every cent at normal price because...

>

> We think we killed most of her cancer back in the summer. We had signs

> that

> her cancer was Inflammatory Breast Cancer but we will never be able to

> prove

> that. We used so many protocols, including Oleander, that her entire life

> was just one big regimented protocol.* After several weeks of the

> oleander,

> her system rebelled at it. We actually took that as a good sign. We still

> have plenty in the fridge.

>

> However, her tumor simply got very hard and stopped changing shape. She

> had

> until recently been taking 6000 IU's of D3 but shortly after starting on

> the

> D3ZO, and I mean maybe 10 days, I began to detect very slight changes in

> her

> tumor. It seemed just ever so slightly smaller. We racked our brains for

> what might have caused this and settled mostly on the D3ZO. There were

> other

> protocol changes, but this one seemed to fit the time line best.

>

> She started taking 50,000 IU's daily (2 capsules) several days ago.

>

> I examined it yesterday and it puzzled me; all I could say to her was that

> somehow it feels less " harsh " and I can't explain it better than that yet.

> Another thing that has happened- when she previously took a hot shower or

> an

> hour long hot clay bath (she does that twice a week), the left breast

> would

> swell badly. It seems not to be doing that as much now. In profile, the

> bulge of the tumor is not as much as it was.

>

> That's about all I can say for now. Hope it helps someone else. Lack of D3

> is highly implicated in Breast Cancer and we learned that very early on

> but

> we had no idea back then that 50,000 IU's is not at all dangerous nor did

> we

> know about this very fine product and company.

>

> *I know that some propose to not mix protocols, to pick one and stick with

> it. Sorry, but I'm a shotgun man, sawed off at that. When danger is close,

> you may not have time to take aim with a rifle. If she really did have

> IBC,

> we didn't have much time.

>

> DaddyBob

>

>

>

> ---

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi DaddyBob

I was thinking these sound good but I would like to find it in about

half that dosage to take daily.

In part I don't want to OD on anything, and I live near Las Vegas, NV.

(land of sunshine).

You say this is in a capsule, do you know the capsule size? If it's

bigger than Zero, I wont be able to

swallow it, due to throat scarring from surgery as a young child. so if

I can't swallow it whole, as is

the case with many capsules and gel caps, I may just pour it out of it

out of the capsule into a drink.

 

Glad to hear your wife is doing better!

I'm a shotgun gal myself, after allowing myself to falsely believe that

the surgery had removed my cancer, then 2 years later discovering it was

still with me and growing. I feel I have wasted 2 years, not fighting

it hard enough with alternative protocols, because I wanted to believe

it was gone. Anyway I feel there is no time to waste doing the 2 step

with it now, I must make it die off and then settle on a good

preventative regimine for life.

 

thank you,

Rachel

 

 

ransley wrote:

> We found, through an e-friends recommendation, a fantastic D3 product. It is

> " D3ZO " from www.lifelinknet.com. It is 25,000 IU's of D3 per small capsule

> (not like the honking big dry tablets in all the common D3 in drug and

> big-box stores) and it has 15 milligrams of Zinc Orotate in it. While the

> amount of zinc is not all that much, it is significant that it is orotate,

> probably the best form you can take. It is about $20 plus shipping (no

> gouges on that shipping) per 30 capsule bottle.

>

> I ordered 2 bottles initially and there were 4 when it came. Curious, I

> called them. They were having a 2-for-1 deal on it and it was set to expire

> that day. I quickly ordered 5 and got 10. Sorry, that deal is gone now, but

> the product may be worth every cent at normal price because...

>

> We think we killed most of her cancer back in the summer. We had signs that

> her cancer was Inflammatory Breast Cancer but we will never be able to prove

> that. We used so many protocols, including Oleander, that her entire life

> was just one big regimented protocol.* After several weeks of the oleander,

> her system rebelled at it. We actually took that as a good sign. We still

> have plenty in the fridge.

>

> However, her tumor simply got very hard and stopped changing shape. She had

> until recently been taking 6000 IU's of D3 but shortly after starting on the

> D3ZO, and I mean maybe 10 days, I began to detect very slight changes in her

> tumor. It seemed just ever so slightly smaller. We racked our brains for

> what might have caused this and settled mostly on the D3ZO. There were other

> protocol changes, but this one seemed to fit the time line best.

>

> She started taking 50,000 IU's daily (2 capsules) several days ago.

>

> I examined it yesterday and it puzzled me; all I could say to her was that

> somehow it feels less " harsh " and I can't explain it better than that yet.

> Another thing that has happened- when she previously took a hot shower or an

> hour long hot clay bath (she does that twice a week), the left breast would

> swell badly. It seems not to be doing that as much now. In profile, the

> bulge of the tumor is not as much as it was.

>

> That's about all I can say for now. Hope it helps someone else. Lack of D3

> is highly implicated in Breast Cancer and we learned that very early on but

> we had no idea back then that 50,000 IU's is not at all dangerous nor did we

> know about this very fine product and company.

>

> *I know that some propose to not mix protocols, to pick one and stick with

> it. Sorry, but I'm a shotgun man, sawed off at that. When danger is close,

> you may not have time to take aim with a rifle. If she really did have IBC,

> we didn't have much time.

>

> DaddyBob

>

>

>

>

>