Guest guest Posted June 20, 2008 Report Share Posted June 20, 2008 Good morning list, I was very intrigued with this post but would like to know the author and source please? tannis z TN pjb12345uk wrote: Chapter 1 Challenging One of the first isues to understand when we are looking at health care systems is posed here as questions for answering it will reveal a lot about our very own health care systems and how they have evolved and what are the implications to us of this evolvement are and our important personnel health. These are the questions. "why is your doctor recomending a particular healing route to you and not other healing routes? . .Why is he telling you about certain therapies and not mentioning others?. But before we get answering these questions a point that is to be made very clear here this is just not me saying this but also thousands of doctors, therapists all over the world who are moving to a more holistic kind of approach in dealing with illness and many are only to aware of the health care systems which are in place now and how they evolved. . And as you will know and see there are some really big limitations which these principles will uncover. As I see it these principles are irrefutable until the day comes where research is done in an objective way funded by a party with no interests but one and that is for the good of the patient with results published good, bad, or indifferent.Now lets back to dealing with answering those questions There are a few very important points that I would like to cover on the subject of drugs and research and treatment. At present the system in England and in many countries is this. Point 1 All treatment recommended by the health care people should be tested and approved and quite rightly so. I am sure we would all want that. Point 2 Obviously it costs vast sums of money to test and approve treatments because of the possible damage to people and the subsequent litigation potentially costing millions of pounds.So money has got to be found from somewhere to get these therapies tested. Point 3 Where does this money come from to test and approve treatments? Does your government fund much research into health care? what is its agenda?- in england the answer is a little yes but in comparison to drug companies the sums are very small, almost insignificant. So by far the biggest source of money going into researching new therapies is from the drug companies.Because the general public has not put enough pressure upon government to do research and because their is an unwillgness from governments to put money in. Do you think drug companies are some charitable institution – in the main they are there to make profit.What do you think the implications of that statement means. Well as we speak there are already groups of people begging companies to find a drug to deal with all sorts of problems .A lot of these groups are turned down because there is not enough of them suffering to justify the cost of research. Also another point worth mentioning for example is this situation- a researcher might go along to his local drug company and tell them his findings about this treatment he has been working on which is of outstanding value but needs testing further or approving, you might think they would be falling over themselves to know more –right, you could not be more wrong. By and large only treatments which show a potential for profit will even get examined. Because they are in business to make a profit, not for serving the people. So many of the hundreds of therapies which they see as having no profit potential do not get approved or even looked at considered etc. These may include osteopathy, Reiki, spiritual healing, nutrition, EFT. Acupuncture, yoga, sound therapy, colour healing, NLP, light therapy, psychic surgery ,earth energy, oxidation therapies ,ozone therapies. Not to mention detoxing, colonics, enemas, crystal healing, fume baths ,castor oil packs ,grape packs, Epsom salt packs, herbs Massage, Spiritual healing, Knieisiology Herbs, Light therapy, Colour therapy, Regression therapy, Osteopathy, Zappers, Magnetic devices, Electrical Frequency devices and so on . Point 4 Your local G.P/ doctor is not a researcher, what does this mean, he is very taxed with his time in the main perhaps seeing 20-40 people per day. That means he may not have the time to do research, he finds it very difficult to keep up with what is going on in the main. He is told what to prescribe. He does not in may cases have the time or energy often to look at research. He may be very much frowned upon by some of his peers for recommending anything other than the norm, some doctors of course ignore those pressures. Many doctors have suffered from prescribing other therapies than the norm. Many doctors in the USA for instance have had to go to Mexico because of the work they were doing Dr hulda clark is one example. Your doctor in the main will have had very little training on nutrition, a huge factor in health care, very little knowledge on the principles of elimination and the benefits of being internally clean. I am sure ther are millions of people who agree that nutrition is a huge factor in health care. That is not to belittle them they simply have not had the training and background of these two basic and vital principles.But the implications to your health from that lack of knowledge are vast . Further I will say that if all you are being offered is pills for depression you are being done a disservice there are a lot of excellent therapies out there and while your doctor may not be able to recommend them for reasons discussed he can mention them. And this is why by and large these things do not get recommended by your local doctor or hospital despite the fact that some of them do have overwhelming benefits, some which have saved needless operations, needless amputations, needless pain and mental trauma, needless kidney failures and much loss of life. In the year 2004 approx. 5000 Beds in the UK alone are being taken up by people who have had a serious reactions to drugs prescibed by doctors. The number of people who have a reaction to some of these drugs but who were not hospitalised must run into millions. so the implications to you from these systems can be dire indeed. Some of these people will die others will be maimed. That is fact. So Mr and Mrs Jones to answer the question posed this is why are you being recommended the healing route which is being offered to you .And why you wont have heard about the better therapies out there. However that is not to say all drugs are bad.But in terms of treating depression i have not come across one which is effective. There are therapies out there that are many times more powerful and suitable and that is what i claim right here and now . It seems more than ever to day that one has to have more discernment and develop good techniques for looking into things. This is an intolerable situation for ill people to be in. To ask people who are ill to think clearly to, have discernment and have the energy to act when all they want to do in fact can do, is rest and sleep and try and get well.These points are irrefutable because they are the basic principles which this world in the main uses. Point 5 What we are calling for is the day to come when research and testing is done by an agency with no vested interests attached and a clear agenda of being objective.Printing their results good, bad or whatever. Perhaps there will from this little book a group of people form and act as a pressure group to force our governments to act for the interests of the people. To fund research with researchers who are objective. Make no mistake about it we are talking about billions of pounds being jeopardised here or being spent in another direction and there is a lot of people who would not like that to happen I assure you. There is clear evidence that some of these drug companies/ governments will even go much further than just dismiss this proposed treatment especially if it is going to affect their profits. For those who wish to look further into these points look into these lives. Dr Raymond rife. John Walsh head of the Edgar cayce center in Durham England on his stuttering problem. Doctors Hertal and Blanc undertook research on the effects of microwave ovens. my experience with dealing with some Charities Personally I have been extensively involved in sharing the Edgar Cayce information, Spiritual healing and some information on the Rife machine over the Internet on problems like MS, Parkinsons, Galucoma, Myasthenia gravis etc. On the issue of M.S.-thousands of groups who had a site on the Internet were contacted including support groups, hospitals etc. Major foundations and national societies were contacted as well. These people have clear mission statements saying for example, for the treatment, support and research on M.S. The response from thousands being contacted-only a few even replied with some interest despite numerous approaches and despite mentioning the clear evidence which the meridian research institute was getting using the Edgar cayce therapies. Information from edgar Cayce research on Glaucoma was also shared, again writing, and e mailing to many National associations and support groups again with very little interest. National organisations were contacted and support groups, the results only about 5% showed any interest at all. Their reasons can only be guessed at but when people make claims with clear mission statements for the alleviation of suffering and don't even bother to enquire or to look into promising information. I put it to you that these organisations- a lot of charities are fraudulently obtaining money from the public.So those who give to charities would do well to ensure that their hard earned cash is being spent well and not being frittered away with very little going towards their true cause. The conclusions: Clearly there are people out there that would do anything to protect their interests. Much apathy reigns as proven by the hundreds of charities and support groups that were contacted. Some people can be like this that is until the day comes to people where illness happens to them, then perhaps there is much more interest shown. Now of course the UK government is fully aware of this situation but has not shown any interest in changing the system. That failure would have a truly awesome cost attached to it of such staggering proportions of pain, suffering, and money it would run into billions and is virtually unquantifiable. To shine some hope on this situation. There is a group of dedicated people Doctors, researchers etc that are trying to bring to you much information and healing and some inroads are being made with quite a few doctors referring some of their patients to other therapists but these are few. One comment from a doctor for instance when he had a patient for years and getting nowhere in desperation he sent his patient to a Reiki healer and within a very short time this person got better. But as he said he dared not make this common knowledge for other doctor members in the practice would cause problems for him personally. So you see there is much to overcome, progress is being hampered by lack of funds, government policy and by some of these drug companies and a great deal of apathy. Prince Charles said to the effect in hello magazine June 06 –imploring doctors for an integrated approach to health care .He mentions that we are missing the trick by not utilising therapies which have been around for thousands of years .He mentions the detrimental effect of food preservatives and colouring and unhealthy diets and pesticides. He saves thousands of pounds of vet bills by utilising homeopathy on his estates. Flaunting in the face of all those who claim that homeopathy is a placebo effect .He has also formed the princes foundation for integrated health care ensuring that osteopaths and chiropractors are properly registered. So i do hope by now you clearly see why you are being offered the treatment you are and why you will not hear about other magnificent therapies and i must say to you if all you are being offered is just drugs to heal your complaint, you dear reader are being done a massive disservice which could have dire consequences should you just follow that recomendation.Well those points covered and they will be a shock to many of you I am sure. We now can move on to a much more positive approach in dealing with illness and depression specifically. --- «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤» § - PULSE ON 21st CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE! § Subscribe:......... - «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤» DISCLOSURE: Any information here in is for educational purpose only; it may be news related, purely speculation or SOMEONE’S OPINION. Always consult with a qualified Medical Doctor before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. SUBMISSION POLICY & CONDITION OF MEMBERSHIP: By becoming a member of this group you AGREE to hold this group its members, list owners, moderators and affiliates harmless of any liability for any direct, consequential, incidental, damage incurred. Anything going to this list may eventually be posted on another list. If you post a piece to the list. We reserve the right to attach your name and email address to the piece, as well as to keep them on record. You should NOT post copyrighted material unless proper attributions to the source of the material are made. Submissions are gladly accepted. Please feel free to post material that you think is worthy. YOU AGREE; to accept responsibility and liability for your own actions and to contact a licensed Medical Doctor before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE; you must : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 can anyone give their opinions on which protocol they think is best. i have been half following a macrobiotic/b17 diet.i have had some chemo and a failed operation.i have an esopheagus tumour which has attached to the lining of my heart and a main artery and part of the lung,this is why surgery wasnt possible,although i wasnt keen anyway. i am thinking of trying cellect and or budwig or oleander. whichever i decide on i will probably have trouble commiting to it even though my life could depend on it.chemo is also being talked about again so i need to make a decision fast. i hope this makes sense,i just want some advice or encouragement really or just someone to talk to,thank you for listening,den. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Hi den, The best protocol that I can suggest is A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol . This includes, first and foremost Oleander (Sutherlandia OPC) which is over 90% effective against all types of cancer. The rest of the protocol includes other cancer fighters and supplements to strengthen your immune system which is of primary importance. It also gives you a "roadmap" on how to address lifestyle changes. All of these put together are imperative for healing. One thing that is of utmost importance is that you commit to the protocol you choose. The road to healing takes a lot of diligence and effort. And YOU are worth it. We are here to support you. I wish you my best, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Den, If you will email me at akreglow I will send you " Critical facts about cancer pointing to effective treatment.doc " The reply already posted sending you to the site named " A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol " seems like a good suggestion. Certainly the liver flush and getting root canals out are both important, and you will see why if you read the doc I am offering to send you. Call me at 641-472-0262, Alan Kreglow, Owner of CancerVictory ------------ oleander soup , " denlovefran " <den-the-men wrote: > > can anyone give their opinions on which protocol they think is best. > i have been half following a macrobiotic/b17 diet.i have had some chemo and a failed operation.i have an esopheagus tumour which has attached to the lining of my heart and a main artery and part of the lung,this is why surgery wasnt possible,although i wasnt keen anyway. > i am thinking of trying cellect and or budwig or oleander. > whichever i decide on i will probably have trouble commiting to it even though my life could depend on it.chemo is also being talked about again so i need to make a decision fast. > i hope this makes sense,i just want some advice or encouragement really or just someone to talk to,thank you for listening,den. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Hello, I was reading about info on Colloidal Silver from the link you gave and has heard about it quite a bit on here. It seems to do miracle for alot of people. But I also saw Colloidal Gold too. My question is what is the difference between the two? I'm planning a course with these product in mind; Sutherlandia OPC, Co-Q10, Colon Health/Cleanse(something to promote a healthy colon) and either Colloidal Silver/Gold. Do you have any suggestion? My wife is diagnose with colon cancer and possible uterus cancer. She is taking zeolite as of right now. And would any of the items I mention above have any contracting effect to what she is taking right now. Her stomache seems to ease of on the pain a little bit since taking the zeolite for a while now. But what discuss me the most is that we switch Doctor and the Doctor that did the x-ray on her colon cancer will not give the new doctor the info on her cancer. So now she is at stage 1 again trying to find out how her colon is doing. If you can give me some suggestion or idea it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much. oleander soup , " May " <luellamay129 wrote: > > > Hi den, > > The best protocol that I can suggest is A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol > </anticancer.htm> . This includes, first and > foremost Oleander (Sutherlandia OPC) which is over 90% effective against > all types of cancer. The rest of the protocol includes other cancer > fighters and supplements to strengthen your immune system which is of > primary importance. It also gives you a " roadmap " on how to address > lifestyle changes. All of these put together are imperative for > healing. > > One thing that is of utmost importance is that you commit to the > protocol you choose. The road to healing takes a lot of diligence and > effort. And YOU are worth it. > > We are here to support you. > > I wish you my best, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 Hi Tony, Colloidal silver has many uses. First of all, it is "nature's antibiotic" it kills one celled organisms and pathogens even those that are becoming resistant to antibiotics. Taken daily, it will prevent infections. Some cancers have shown to have viral and/or fungal qualities, so you will find colloidal silver included in A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol . Colloidal Gold is beneficial for one's emotions, as it harmonizes, body, soul. and spirit. It eases depression and gives one clarity of mind. It is also very effective against arthritis. All of the items that you mentioned are compatible and may I also suggest that she follow as much of A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol as possible. All of it would be ideal. All the supplements and recommendations are a roadmap to building one's immune system and defeating cancer. At the very least, I would suggest that she also take Inositol/IP6, Curcumin and iodine supplementation. These are all very important when addressing cancer. By the way, isn't it the law that all medical records be made available to you? My very best, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 That doctor "has" to give you her medical information! He must be trying to "Hide" something from you! Did you sign a "Release of Information" at your new doctor? I would sign the release at the new doctor, have them fax it to the old doctor, requesting "Immediate" release of records to be faxed to new doctor! The old doctor, may be lieing about the diagnosis? Nothing surprises me now a days! Blessings to you both, Elizabeth kxtone <kxtoneoleander soup Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:38:43 PM Re: which way to go Hello,I was reading about info on Colloidal Silver from the link you gave and has heard about it quite a bit on here. It seems to do miracle for alot of people. But I also saw Colloidal Gold too. My question is what is the difference between the two?I'm planning a course with these product in mind; Sutherlandia OPC, Co-Q10, Colon Health/Cleanse( something to promote a healthy colon)and either Colloidal Silver/Gold.Do you have any suggestion? My wife is diagnose with colon cancer and possible uterus cancer.She is taking zeolite as of right now. And would any of the items I mention above have any contracting effect to what she is taking right now. Her stomache seems to ease of on the pain a little bit since taking the zeolite for a while now. But what discuss me the most is that we switch Doctor and the Doctor that did the x-ray on her colon cancer will not give the new doctor the info on her cancer. So now she is at stage 1 again trying to find out how her colon is doing.If you can give me some suggestion or idea it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much.Tonyoleander soup, " May" <luellamay129@ ...> wrote:>> > Hi den,> > The best protocol that I can suggest is A Natural Anti-Cancer Protocol> <http://www.tbyil. com/anticancer. htm> . This includes, first and> foremost Oleander (Sutherlandia OPC) which is over 90% effective against> all types of cancer. The rest of the protocol includes other cancer> fighters and supplements to strengthen your immune system which is of> primary importance. It also gives you a "roadmap" on how to address> lifestyle changes. All of these put together are imperative for> healing.> > One thing that is of utmost importance is that you commit to the> protocol you choose. The road to healing takes a lot of diligence and> effort. And YOU are worth it.> > We are here to support you.> > I wish you my best,> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2009 Report Share Posted August 13, 2009 Hi Den,Next month I will be a 1 year Liposarcoma survivor. In the first 6 months I did so many protocols to detoxify my body and make sure that my Sarcoma didn't come back that I had to go on Long-term sick leave. I did Budwig, Oleander, the Bob Beck Protocol, Liver and Gall-bladder flushing as well as 4 months of the Cesium Chloride Protocol. And lots of coffee enemas and herbal tincures to support my liver. I realize this is a lot of "stuff", however my surgeon anticipated that he would be scheduling me for more surgery before Christmas 2008 - something I wasn't even willing to contemplate. If it were me, I would do as much as you possibly can. You know your limit and no one else can define that for you. I have my family members questioning me all the time about whether I may be doing too much. However I am an RN and I have seen more than they have and use that info to my advantage. Cellect apparently buys you time whilst Oleander begins to work. And Budwig just complements it all. I realize it is hard to stick with all of this - we all have our off days or weeks and just want it all to be normal again. Rest assured, these protocols do work. There is no doubt that chemo scares the hell out of cancer. I didn't have to make that choice because sarcomas apparently don't respond to chemo or radiation. However I do know that if I had a tumor that actually did respond to chemo (not the misleading mainstream figures), then I would have done that, too along with all these protocols.Regardless of what you end up doing, do it to the best of your ability. It will make a difference and that can be the catalyst you need to stick with the protocol/s you choose. I know for me, cancer was the result of many lifestyle choices I made. I also had to change the language I was using in my head i.e. self-defeating language that would sabotage anything I was doing. If you can't commit 100%, do the best you can. It's not an easy journey, but I am finding it to be very worthwile.Blessings, Eva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.