Mike Adams on govt forced poisoning of children

May 25, 2009

(NaturalNews) You see it in newspapers and websites across the 'net:

People insisting that 13-year-old Daniel Hauser must be injected with

chemotherapy in order to "save his life," and that anyone refusing to

go along with that is a criminal deserving of arrest and imprisonment.What's

most astonishing about the mainstream reaction to the forced

chemotherapy of Daniel Hauser is not merely that they believe states

now own the children, but that they believe in the entire world there

exists but one single treatment for cancer, and it happens to be the

one that makes pharmaceutical companies the most money. The arrogance

(and ignorance) of that position is mind boggling.There was

once a time when western medical doctors believed that the heavy metal

mercury was a medicine, too. They methodically used mercury to treat

hundreds of different diseases and conditions, oblivious to the fact

that they were actually poisoning people with this toxic heavy metal.And

yet, imagine if authorities had arrested parents for not treating their

children with mercury. Imagine if they threw parents in prison for

refusing their "mercury medicine." That would be equivalent to today's

arrogant, misguided and extremely dangerous campaign to outlaw saying

"no" to chemotherapy.A brief history of medical quackeryIt

was mercury, in fact, that led to the term "quack." Mercury is called

"quicksilver," and those doctors who prescribed it were eventually

discovered to be pushing toxic chemicals rather than any real medicine.

They were initially called "quicks" and then later "quacks."The

quackery of those doctors prescribing mercury wasn't hard to miss:

People taking the mercury would get extremely ill. Their hair would

fall out. They would lose their appetite and experience extreme loss of

body weight. Many would simply die from the toxicity.Remarkably, these are the same side effects produced by chemotherapy.

And today, chemotherapy doctors describe these side effects in

precisely the same terms as the mercury quacks of a century ago,

claiming the effects are "part of the healing process" and encouraging

patients to find the courage to "just go through with it."But let's pull our heads out of the muck here and acknowledge the obvious: Poisoning patients -- whether with mercury or chemotherapy -- will never produce healing.

And the prescribing of such toxic chemicals to patients is little more

than sophisticated quackery, backed by seemingly convincing data (which

is actually based on scientific fraud) along with the urgings of cancer

doctors who rely on highly manipulative fear tactics to corral patients

into treatments that will only harm them.Do parents have the right to protect their children from poison?Today,

the mother of 13-year-old Daniel Hauser is on the run, having skipped

out on the Minnesota court that ordered her to poison her own child.

She is now considered criminally negligent by the state -- a parent who

belongs behind bars and will likely be imprisoned when she is arrested

at gunpoint.And yet, I ask you this: What else could she have

done? To appear in court and submit her child to chemical injections of

a toxic substance would amount to child abuse. She is doing

what any sensible parent would do: She's protecting her child from the

poisons of the world, and standing up against the tyrants of modern

medicine who so desperately seek to exploit her child for profit that

they have actually turned to enforcing their business at gunpoint in

order to do so.It is interesting that pharmaceutical medicine is the only industry in America that's forced to recruit its patients at gunpoint.I call it Gunpoint Medicine, and it is exactly as it sounds: The enforcing of medical quackery at gunpoint.

It is also interesting that conventional medicine is so utterly

(and arrogantly) convinced that its chemicals are the one and only

solution for any disease, it now believes those who seek other healing

modalities should be arrested and imprisoned.It puts the operations of conventional (pharmaceutical) medicine in a whole new light (or darkness, as it were). Now, conventional medicine requires armed enforcers -- medical mercenaries

who push patented chemicals at gunpoint. After all, without the threat

of firearms toted by local law enforcement, the courts of Minnesota

would have no leverage over the Hauser family. Conventional medicine is

now paired with armed foot soldiers who effectively enforce the

marketing of their products at the barrel of a gun.And let's be clear about this: The decision of the Minnesota court is little more than the marketing of a modern form of quackery, enforced with the threat firearms.I'll

ask the obvious question: When faced with being threatened at gunpoint

by doctors pushing toxic chemicals onto children, with their freedoms

taken away and their parental rights trampled beyond recovery, do not these parents have the right to defend the lives and safety of their children with their own firearms?

If an intruder barges through your front door armed with a syringe

filled with toxic chemicals, and he tries to inject those chemicals

into your son or daughter, you are well within your rights as a free citizen to shoot that intruder before he can harm your children.Guns

work both ways, after all, and firearms remain the last-ditch defense

of citizens attempting to protect their lives and freedoms from

tyrannical governments. The United States of America, of course, is

founded on precisely such principles.The State as criminalIt

is never lawful or just for a government to kidnap children at

gunpoint, to imprison their parents and injected their children with

toxic chemicals merely because those parents seek more natural healing

modalities. Technically, any citizen who is subjected to such

tyrannical treatments has every right, under the U.S. Constitution, to

defend their family members with the use of lethal force against such

intruders. Just because those intruders happened to be on the state

payroll does not make them any less criminal in their actions.By

comparison, car companies don't market their products at gunpoint. If

you showed up at a car dealer and said, "I was a pickup truck," but

they shoved a gun in your face and said, "No, you will buy a sedan or

you will go to prison," you would probably think that's a bit insane.Tourism

companies don't market their services at gunpoint, either. If you went

to a travel agent and said you wanted to take your family to

Disneyland, but they whipped out a Colt 45, shoved it in your face, and

said, "You're going to Alaska," you might be taken aback.But

modern medicine is now operating with the same terrorizing threat: You

take your son to a doctor, asking for help, and he calls gun-toting law

enforcement officials who essentially threaten you at gunpoint, saying,

"You will choose chemotherapy or lose your children." That's what's

happening today, right now, with the Hauser family and the state of

Minnesota.It just goes to show you how desperate the cancer industry is to thwart free choice. The most dangerous threat to pharmaceutical medicine is an informed mother who chooses to say no to toxic chemotherapy. And that is precisely why such choices are being criminalized.It

has nothing to do with the health of 13-year-old Daniel Hauser. It has

everything to do with monopolizing the medical industry, putting fear

into the minds of parents, and continuing a tradition of outright

quackery that sells poison to patients while calling it "treatment."And

it has everything, of course, to do with asserting the power of

tyrannical government over the People, controlling their behavior,

erecting virtual prisons in their own minds that prevent them from

venturing outside the bounds of "accepted" behavior. Modern medicine,

in this way, is working in conspiracy with tyrannical government to

turn People into medical slaves, and it is stripping away their

freedoms, their choice and their very children in the process.

May 25, 2009

Thank you.

AND do not worry about offending anyone here.

We understand completely.

Thank you again.

Please continue expressing yourself openly.

Rich

In a message dated 5/25/2009 6:10:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, darrenpollok writes:

Whoever wrote this "rant" about the Daniel Hauser situation, thank you. It is exactly how I feel. Parents are treated like the enemy of their children, and "Big Brother" government is their only savior. I don't think of myself as an alarmist, but I think the Bible describes this very situation in the book of Revelation. I trust my government less and less daily, and I am saddened that the dream that our Founding Fathers had has been not only dashed, but defecated upon. I apologize for offending anyone, but I am PEEVED!!Darren (Luke's dad)http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lukepollok---

May 25, 2009

Whoever wrote this " rant " about the Daniel Hauser situation, thank you. It

is exactly how I feel. Parents are treated like the enemy of their children,

and " Big Brother " government is their only savior. I don't think of myself as

an alarmist, but I think the Bible describes this very situation in the book of

Revelation.

I trust my government less and less daily, and I am saddened that the dream

that our Founding Fathers had has been not only dashed, but defecated upon.

I apologize for offending anyone, but I am PEEVED!!

Darren (Luke's dad)

http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lukepollok

May 26, 2009

Hi Darren,

I just wanted to chime in here with Rich and say I agree with you Darren. I liked the term "defecated" that you used too. I've been down this road were talking about here. It is beyond words. Your thoughts are echoed by many people here on this group I'm sure. I read the post about veterans should be outraged about the judges order etc. for Daniel (I think is his name in Minnesota) and whoever wrote that is RIGHT!!! oh I just figured it out Mike Adams said that...Right ON!!!

I signed up for updates on Luke's caringbridge website and I will be thinking good thoughts & praying and I am glad you found OPC!

Peace,

Carla

^^Nick's^^ mom

--- On Mon, 5/25/09, richmaj <richmaj wrote:

richmaj <richmajRe: Re: Mike Adams on govt forced poisoning of childrenoleander soup Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 6:18 PM

Thank you.

AND do not worry about offending anyone here.

We understand completely.

Thank you again.

Please continue expressing yourself openly.

Rich

In a message dated 5/25/2009 6:10:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, darrenpollok@ writes:

Whoever wrote this "rant" about the Daniel Hauser situation, thank you. It is exactly how I feel. Parents are treated like the enemy of their children, and "Big Brother" government is their only savior. I don't think of myself as an alarmist, but I think the Bible describes this very situation in the book of Revelation. I trust my government less and less daily, and I am saddened that the dream that our Founding Fathers had has been not only dashed, but defecated upon. I apologize for offending anyone, but I am PEEVED!!Darren (Luke's dad)http://www.caringbr idge.org/ visit/lukepollok------------ --------- --------- ------