Parasites and intro

May 23, 2009

Well I don't have cancer but I have been doing tons of parasite cleansing and have seen a LOT of liver flukes, including some large red chunks of adults, and smaller chunks of juveniles. I have passed some intestinal flukes (green), and quite a few tape worms. The tape worms pieces looked much like rice until I got to the head, and there were several of those. I never properly introduced myself, but I was diagnosed HIV+ about 18 years ago. I have never been sick from it, and loaded up on vitamins all along. I started the cocktail about 9-10 years ago when my t-cells got somewhat low (I think in the 300 range). I have been researching and trying various alternative treatment options, and have gone off meds a few times until my numbers get bad again. When I noticed that Dr Hulda mostly blames HIV on parasites, and then kept seeing treatment options that both increase tcell counts and have antiparasitic activity, I theorized the virus hides in the parasites when we are undetectible, and that's where it keeps coming back from. I have been at war with them and have also been doing lots of colon cleanses, had my mercury fillings replaced, and am currently doing heavy metal cleansing. I am on day 7 of my 4th master cleanse (I have been doing them every other month).I have been lurking here for a while and am glad to be here. I am learning tons. Thanks, DanielOn May 22, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Mike Golden <goldenmike86 wrote:

I'm afraid the burden of proof is on the side of Clark. Her contentions fly in the face of parasitology as it is understood and taught. Parasitologists (like mycologists) are academic scientists, involved in the interests of their branch of science. If they thought that parasites, the objects of their affection, were the cause of most cancers, they would be broadly publishing on this. That would really pump up their research budgets and grant money. However, unlike Clark, they are not finding all these liver flukes in people.

There are thousands of these guys with thousands of microscopes. They've been in business for longer than Clark's "50 years". Who are we supposed to believe on this one?

Mike--- On Sat, 5/23/09, richmaj <richmaj wrote:

richmaj <richmajRe: Re: CANCER IS A FUNGUSoleander soup Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 1:18 AM

I believe in being fair.

Dr. Clark has presented thousands of pages of data over 40-50 years.

Perhaps you would like to present your sources to the group, for our perusal ,reading

and comment.

Thanks.

Rich

In a message dated 5/21/2009 9:19:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, goldenmike86@ writes:

Just about anything that causes inflammation might contribute to the formation of a tumor. This could include chemicals, radiation, physical trauma, chronic inflammatory disease, etc. Parasites can cause inflammation, so they can be included. Is there such a thing as liver flukes? Yes. Are they commonly found in cancer patients? No. Is isopropyl alchohol somehow connected here, and can it mysteriously attract flukes? No.

If you throw enough goop against the wall some of it will stick. This is pretty much the way I look at Clark's statements. They include some well known alternative concepts mixed with a lot of stuff that seems to come from an overactive imagination.

Mike

--- On Thu, 5/21/09, lillisilly <evangelnet (AT) vtlink (DOT) net> wrote:

lillisilly <evangelnet (AT) vtlink (DOT) net> Re: CANCER IS A FUNGUSoleander soupThursday, May 21, 2009, 12:59 PM

oleander soup, Mike Golden <goldenmike86@ ...> *Many people do have trouble with fungus.* What about Hulda Clark's assertion that all cancer comes from a combination of parasites and use of isopropyl alcohol???http://www.cam. net.uk/home/ aaa315/healing/ CANCER.HTM# abstractI just now read this information. I am curious about whether or not there is an basis for this theory?TIA, Jill~

Recession-proof vacation ideas. Find free things to do in the U.S.