Guest guest Posted August 23, 2006 Report Share Posted August 23, 2006 Chinese Traditional Medicine , " victoria_dragon " <victoria_dragon wrote: > > Chinese Traditional Medicine , " sethwai " <sethwai@> wrote: > > > > A physician whom I respect has said that studies are starting to > > confirm that getting adequate vitamin D is more of a factor in poor > > bone health than getting adequate calcium. Most people in > > industrialized societies do not get enough vitamin D since they spend > > most of their time indoors. > > Have there been any studies on sun block interfering with the body's > ability to make vitamin D when exposed to sunlight? > The loss of bone is a function of improper balance between the alkaline minerals and the acid minerals. When we have insuffecient alkaline minerals to balance the excess circulating acids then the body leaches calcium from the bones to help neutrilize these damaging acids. The causes of this are often complicated - example - bone function is dependent on Testosterone but in a highly acidic state of the blood (combined with stasis) the production of Testosterone is inhibited. This problem is made worse when there is an imbalance between Testosterone and Estrogen. Another issue is the modern concept that is developing that many disease processes like osteopenia and osteoporosis are caused by infectious processes. One can read about this subject at such sites as the Road Back Foundation's (they are basically an organization of people who are attempting to cure rheumatoid arthritis with long term antibiotic therapy) they will have papers there discussing the role of cell wall defecient bacteria in many disease processes like congestive heart failure - CFS - FMS - most autoimmune processes - arthritis - etc. I am very receptive to this emerging new model of disease because it is consistant with many long term understandings in TCM and Ayurveda. The role of infections and other heat conditions (like inflammatory processes) in all of the diseases processes mentioned above - have been known for centuries. In all of the processes related to bone Vitamin D is a major player - it is most often much more important than calcium - as I said the problem is not mainly a calcium defeciency - it is a problem of improper cacium metabolism - this can be related to hormones - infections - acid conditions - etc. Many studies have been done showing the problems with sunscreens - sunscreens are a very bad idea. Here are a couple of links where a young researcher has wriiten on the subject - he has defined the problems very nicely. He states that 95% of the Vit D production in the skin is stopped by sunscreens. Just last week I saw on CNN a report that a new study has shown that sunscreens cause cancer - not prevent it - this is explained at the second link below. People with bone problems should avoid sunscreens completely becuase this may not be a primary problem but it obviously makes the problems much worse. Dr. Mercola (www.mercola.com) is a big advocate of suffecient Vit D to support the many vital functions that it is involved in - including calcium metabolism. http://www.newstarget.com/003069.html http://www.newstarget.com/001264.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2006 Report Share Posted August 23, 2006 It's interesting about the importance that medical research has placed on vitamin D lately. I'm 56 (in menopause) & have nursed 3 babies for a total of 7 1/2 years so my 'loss' of calcium should have supposedly placed me in jeopardy of osteoporosis. Yet my bones are very strong. I've never used sunscreens (hate the greasy, sticky feel!) although I also don't spend much time in strong sunlight due to having fair skin & blue eyes (northern European ancestry). I need to be outside a lot but pick cloudy days or early morning or evening for that reason. I still have probably gotten a lot of vitamin D even under those conditions. I've also taken vitamins D supplements & extra magnesium all my adult life. I took more vitamin D than was once thought to be needed but now find that the amount I've been taking is considered the 'new recommended' amount for maximum benefits. Its benefits have been found not to just cover bone metabolism but immune function & a host of other related areas. I wonder if my extra intake may have contributed to the fact I rarely, if ever, get infections of any sort? Only twice when I've been under *severe* stress, have I become ill. I've also never had any menopause symptoms or PMS earlier in my life. Vitamin D is classed as a vitamin but it's not really. It behaves as a hormone once converted in the kidneys. <http://depts.washington.edu/bonebio/ASBMRed/hormones.html#VitD> I'd like to note something I read years ago about those who prefer to get their vitamin D from skin exposure to sunlight. Vitamin D is formed by the action of sunlight on cholesterol in our skin. But it's more accurate to say that it's formed ON our skin as the cholesterol is in the oils made by our sebaceous glands that release it *onto* the surface of our skin. With our obsession of washing frequently, especially after we've been in the sun & become sweaty, any oils are washed off before the body has properly absorbed the vitamin D formed. I honestly have no idea how long it takes for the vitamin D to be absorbed so perhaps someone has info on this? Animals covered by fur absorb the vitamin D formed on their fur (since their skin isn't exposed) by washing themselves with their tongues, ingesting it instead. So if anyone decides to increase their vitamin D intake using sunlight, I'd suggest not washing the oils off your skin till a few hours or more later to ensure you've absorbed your a proper amount. Judy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.