U/S, yes or no? Ultrasound or Thermography ?

[Guest guest]

You can also check : Thermography

 

Thermography -

 

Prevention has to be the most important tool for fighting cancer. Moreover, what

is really important is that cancer is detected as early as possible so that its

growth can be curbed. Nowadays there are several cancer early detection and

prevention tests that have proved beneficial in identifying malignancy. While

many of these tests are conventional, some of the less toxic or newer testing

methods include AMAS, Thermography etc. It must also be understood that you

should not rely on just one single test. You must consider all the clinical

factors into thought in order to back up a doctor's diagnosis.

 

The use of thermal imaging for detection of new blood vessels and chemical

changes that are typically associated with genies and growth of tumor is called

Thermography. Using this technique, the infrared heat radiations from one's body

can be measured into anatomical images. Thermography is very effective as an

early warning system, and is able to detect and identify cancer much before it

can be detected by mammography. Most effective in the detection of breast

cancer, thermography has been known to detect even the slowest cancerous growth.

When used with a combination of approaches (clinical examination, mammography,

thermography), it has been found that as many as 95% early stage cancers can be

detected.

 

Using an infrared thermography camera makes many thousands of detailed measures

of the patient's skin temperature from a distance of 5-8 feet. The produced

images are viewed as an image in a spectrum of colors that are indicative of

abnormal levels of heat being given out by the surface of the body.

 

 

 

Advantages & Disadvantages of Thermography:

 

1. The electronic image allows comparison of temperatures over a larger area

2. Even moving targets can be captures in real time

3. Health of weakening/infected components can be found before failure

4. Can measure areas that can't be accessed easily by other conventional and

risky methods

5. The equipment is expensive and require a great deal of care

6. Pictures tend to be difficult to interpret even for the most experienced

physician

7. Training and staying up-to-date in thermography is time intensive

8. Most of the thermography cameras have a ±2% or more accuracy problem

9. Diagnostic thermal imaging or diagnostic thermography is not easily

available

10. It is not readily accepted by the physicians and the public due to lack of

understanding

 

Long Life Happiness and Balance !!

[Guest guest]

Search AmericanHealthChoice.com. An infrared device was recently developed by that group and its sensitivity and specificity is far beyond other imaging techniques. The US government and the Texas government sent in orders for over a dozen immediately upon the announcement of the release. I use to work for Dr. Wes Stucki, the CEO.Dr. Michael L. Goebel--- On Mon, 4/20/09, shaman_urban <shaman_urban wrote:shaman_urban <shaman_urban Re: U/S, yes or no? Ultrasound or Thermography ?oleander soup Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 10:20 AM

 

You can also check : Thermography

 

Thermography -

 

Prevention has to be the most important tool for fighting cancer. Moreover, what is really important is that cancer is detected as early as possible so that its growth can be curbed. Nowadays there are several cancer early detection and prevention tests that have proved beneficial in identifying malignancy. While many of these tests are conventional, some of the less toxic or newer testing methods include AMAS, Thermography etc. It must also be understood that you should not rely on just one single test. You must consider all the clinical factors into thought in order to back up a doctor's diagnosis.

 

The use of thermal imaging for detection of new blood vessels and chemical changes that are typically associated with genies and growth of tumor is called Thermography. Using this technique, the infrared heat radiations from one's body can be measured into anatomical images. Thermography is very effective as an early warning system, and is able to detect and identify cancer much before it can be detected by mammography. Most effective in the detection of breast cancer, thermography has been known to detect even the slowest cancerous growth. When used with a combination of approaches (clinical examination, mammography, thermography) , it has been found that as many as 95% early stage cancers can be detected.

 

Using an infrared thermography camera makes many thousands of detailed measures of the patient's skin temperature from a distance of 5-8 feet. The produced images are viewed as an image in a spectrum of colors that are indicative of abnormal levels of heat being given out by the surface of the body.

 

Advantages & Disadvantages of Thermography:

 

1. The electronic image allows comparison of temperatures over a larger area

2. Even moving targets can be captures in real time

3. Health of weakening/infected components can be found before failure

4. Can measure areas that can't be accessed easily by other conventional and risky methods

5. The equipment is expensive and require a great deal of care

6. Pictures tend to be difficult to interpret even for the most experienced physician

7. Training and staying up-to-date in thermography is time intensive

8. Most of the thermography cameras have a ±2% or more accuracy problem

9. Diagnostic thermal imaging or diagnostic thermography is not easily available

10. It is not readily accepted by the physicians and the public due to lack of understanding

 

Long Life Happiness and Balance !!

[Guest guest]

Thank you so very much for all that information Michael! Personally, I don't think I really NEED any of them! The closest thermographist is several hours away. He is good. He specialises in illnesses caused by environmental poisons, including vaccines and is one of the best chelators. He does nutritional support and homoeopathy. I think he is the only thermographist in the country! I guess that no matter the composition of the lump, the answer, healthwise, is the same. I think this just may be the tail end of the years it's taken to get rid of the pesticide poisoning. How lucky that it has mostly been expressed from my skin, rather than being driven deep. I guess if the lump was to be biopsied they would find it full of the sticking, wetting, and dispersal agents used in the pesticide. I got a call from radiology today - had to

laugh as they say they don't return calls. I was told that the surgeon requires a mammogram. I said that was fine - he is welcome to have a mammogram but I don't require one thanks. All I wanted was some form of documentation rather than NOT having it "tracked". This is why we never hear about "alternative" recoveries, because the allopathic means of tracking progress are ridiculously dangerous (irradiation or needle biopsies) or not definitive enough (U/S).Thanks again. Mara--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Michael Goebel <goebelchx wrote:Michael Goebel <goebelchxRe: Re: U/S, yes or no? Ultrasound or Thermography ?oleander soup Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 11:32 AM

 

Search AmericanHealthChoic e.com. An infrared device was recently developed by that group and its sensitivity and specificity is far beyond other imaging techniques. The US government and the Texas government sent in orders for over a dozen immediately upon the announcement of the release. I use to work for Dr. Wes Stucki, the CEO.Dr. Michael L. Goebel--- On Mon, 4/20/09, shaman_urban <shaman_urban@ > wrote:shaman_urban <shaman_urban@ > Re: U/S, yes or no? Ultrasound or Thermography

?oleander soupMonday, April 20, 2009, 10:20 AM

 

You can also check : Thermography

 

Thermography -

 

Prevention has to be the most important tool for fighting cancer. Moreover, what is really important is that cancer is detected as early as possible so that its growth can be curbed. Nowadays there are several cancer early detection and prevention tests that have proved beneficial in identifying malignancy. While many of these tests are conventional, some of the less toxic or newer testing methods include AMAS, Thermography etc. It must also be understood that you should not rely on just one single test. You must consider all the clinical factors into thought in order to back up a doctor's diagnosis.

 

The use of thermal imaging for detection of new blood vessels and chemical changes that are typically associated with genies and growth of tumor is called Thermography. Using this technique, the infrared heat radiations from one's body can be measured into anatomical images. Thermography is very effective as an early warning system, and is able to detect and identify cancer much before it can be detected by mammography. Most effective in the detection of breast cancer, thermography has been known to detect even the slowest cancerous growth.. When used with a combination of approaches (clinical examination, mammography, thermography) , it has been found that as many as 95% early stage cancers can be detected.

 

Using an infrared thermography camera makes many thousands of detailed measures of the patient's skin temperature from a distance of 5-8 feet. The produced images are viewed as an image in a spectrum of colors that are indicative of abnormal levels of heat being given out by the surface of the body.

 

Advantages & Disadvantages of Thermography:

 

1. The electronic image allows comparison of temperatures over a larger area

2. Even moving targets can be captures in real time

3. Health of weakening/infected components can be found before failure

4. Can measure areas that can't be accessed easily by other conventional and risky methods

5. The equipment is expensive and require a great deal of care

6. Pictures tend to be difficult to interpret even for the most experienced physician

7. Training and staying up-to-date in thermography is time intensive

8. Most of the thermography cameras have a ±2% or more accuracy problem

9. Diagnostic thermal imaging or diagnostic thermography is not easily available

10. It is not readily accepted by the physicians and the public due to lack of understanding

 

Long Life Happiness and Balance !!

[Guest guest]

Mara,

You are wise not to let yourself be talked into a mammogram. Not only is the radiation highly dangerous, but you risk the lump being ruptured and spread throughout the body with the pressure they use during the process.

 

oleander soup , Maracuja <howdurdago wrote:>> Thank you so very much for all that information Michael! > Personally, I don't think I really NEED any of them! The closest thermographist is several hours away. He is good. He specialises in illnesses caused by environmental poisons, including vaccines and is one of the best chelators. He does nutritional support and homoeopathy. I think he is the only thermographist in the country! > > I guess that no matter the composition of the lump, the answer, healthwise, is the same. I think this just may be the tail end of the years it's taken to get rid of the pesticide poisoning. How lucky that it has mostly been expressed from my skin, rather than being driven deep. I guess if the lump was to be biopsied they would find it full of the sticking, wetting, and dispersal agents used in the pesticide.> > I got a call from radiology today - had to laugh as they say they don't return calls. I was told that the surgeon requires a mammogram. I said that was fine - he is welcome to have a mammogram but I don't require one thanks. All I wanted was some form of documentation rather than NOT having it "tracked". This is why we never hear about "alternative" recoveries, because the allopathic means of tracking progress are ridiculously dangerous (irradiation or needle biopsies) or not definitive enough (U/S).> Thanks again. > Mara>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the support - they were shocked that I have never had a mammogram - apprently the age differs depending on funding received from the government. The songrapher said age 50 then corrected herself downwards to 45 as they are paid for by the taxpayer. Funny how that determines who is "at risk". I intend holding on to my no mammogram track record.Went ahead with the U/S - 3 different people tried talking me into mammograms. Only one asked why not. I said I was NOT on a search & find mission, only an already-found-let's identify-it mission.. U/S can distinguish between cysts and cancer. It's a cyst - in fact, lots of them. One is big enough to name!!!! They asked if I wanted them drained!!!!!!!! No thanks, absolutely DO NOT PUNCTURE MY SKIN - a friend died in

that hospital from hMRSA nearly 2 yrs ago! He got GBS from flu vaccination and deteriorated from there. He wasn't into alternatives though. Today there were signs up everywhere that all pts have to clean their hands with alcohol gel. Must be a leftover from their last MRSA scare. Just shows how silly the germ theory is! No one came near me with the anti-germ gel. So I will keep on keeping on trying to get rid of the last vestiges of the toxic spray!Thanks again. Love you all.Mara--- On Tue, 4/21/09, May <luellamay129 wrote: May <luellamay129 Re: U/S, yes or no? Ultrasound or Thermography ?oleander soup Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 7:33 AM

 

Mara,

You are wise not to let yourself be talked into a mammogram. Not only is the radiation highly dangerous, but you risk the lump being ruptured and spread throughout the body with the pressure they use during the process.

 

oleander soup, Maracuja <howdurdago@. ..> wrote:>> Thank you so very much for all that information Michael! > Personally, I don't think I really NEED any of them! The closest thermographist is several hours away. He is good. He specialises in illnesses caused by environmental poisons, including vaccines and is one of the best chelators. He does nutritional support and homoeopathy. I think he is the only thermographist in the country! > > I guess that no matter the composition of the lump, the answer, healthwise, is the same. I think this just may be the tail end of the years it's taken to get rid of the pesticide poisoning. How lucky that it has mostly been expressed from my skin, rather than being driven deep. I guess if the lump was to be biopsied they would find it full of the sticking, wetting, and dispersal agents used in the

pesticide.> > I got a call from radiology today - had to laugh as they say they don't return calls. I was told that the surgeon requires a mammogram. I said that was fine - he is welcome to have a mammogram but I don't require one thanks. All I wanted was some form of documentation rather than NOT having it "tracked". This is why we never hear about "alternative" recoveries, because the allopathic means of tracking progress are ridiculously dangerous (irradiation or needle biopsies) or not definitive enough (U/S).> Thanks again. > Mara>

[Guest guest]

Hi Mara,

So glad you found out exactly what the lumps are. And again, so glad they didn't talk you into a mammogram. Unfortunately, their pressure tacticts are effective on too many people. I remember years ago how my doctor actually became irate when I refused one. And this one was just for normal health care screening. ahem.

Hugs,

 

 

oleander soup , Maracuja <howdurdago wrote:>> Thanks for the support - they were shocked that I have never had a mammogram - apprently the age differs depending on funding received from the government. The songrapher said age 50 then corrected herself downwards to 45 as they are paid for by the taxpayer. Funny how that determines who is "at risk". I intend holding on to my no mammogram track record.> > Went ahead with the U/S - 3 different people tried talking me into mammograms. Only one asked why not. I said I was NOT on a search & find mission, only an already-found-let's identify-it mission. U/S can distinguish between cysts and cancer. It's a cyst - in fact, lots of them. One is big enough to name!!!! > > They asked if I wanted them drained!!!!!!!! No thanks, absolutely DO NOT PUNCTURE MY SKIN - a friend died in that hospital from hMRSA nearly 2 yrs ago! He got GBS from flu vaccination and deteriorated from there. He wasn't into alternatives though. > Today there were signs up everywhere that all pts have to clean their hands with alcohol gel. Must be a leftover from their last MRSA scare. Just shows how silly the germ theory is! No one came near me with the anti-germ gel. > > So I will keep on keeping on trying to get rid of the last vestiges of the toxic spray!> Thanks again. Love you all.> Mara