Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

glutathione

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Thanks JoAnn, your post snipped below reflects the research that

shows oral glutathione doesn't increase glutathione levels in

humans, so glutathione precursors are required to increase

glutathione in cells.

 

Duncan

 

> The authors of the study concluded " it is not feasible to increase

> circulating glutathione to a clinically beneficial extent by the oral

> administrating of a single application of 3,000 mg of glutathione. "

> Absorption of glutathione may be better in rats because unlike the

> gastrointestinal tract of rats, the human gastrointestinal tract

> contains significant amounts of an enzyme (gamma-

> glutamyltranspeptidase) that breaks down glutathione.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a clinical Nutritionist. I have been using high dose oral

Glutathione for ten years, The results have been outstanding. This often

quoted study is part of a big lie. It was one study done on 7 people. A

single dose of 3 grams of Glutathione was given orally.Blood test

measurements did not show an incease in Glutathione. Lots of things

wrong with this study and the conclusion. Very small sample, Glutathione

can be distributed throughout the body, leaving less in the blood. The

arguement that Glutathione is broken down is also not true, The enzymes

that break down Glutathione are found in the kidney and the last part of

the small intestine, It is not broken down by stomach acids. Anyone who

has used high dose Glutathione powder orally will despute the absortion

conclusion. Lets not base an entire theory on " one small study "

, Duncan Crow

<duncancrow wrote:

>

> Thanks JoAnn, your post snipped below reflects the research that

> shows oral glutathione doesn't increase glutathione levels in

> humans, so glutathione precursors are required to increase

> glutathione in cells.

>

> Duncan

>

> > The authors of the study concluded " it is not feasible to increase

> > circulating glutathione to a clinically beneficial extent by the

oral

> > administrating of a single application of 3,000 mg of glutathione. "

> > Absorption of glutathione may be better in rats because unlike the

> > gastrointestinal tract of rats, the human gastrointestinal tract

> > contains significant amounts of an enzyme (gamma-

> > glutamyltranspeptidase) that breaks down glutathione.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--- In

The pharmacokinetics of oral glutathionine in humans are not well

understood. It appears that in some animals (mice, rats, guinea pigs),

serum glutathione levels do increase following its oral administration.

Most human studies of glutathione have not found this to be the case. It

appears that oral glutathione is hydrolyzed in the intestine via the

intestinal gamma-glutamyl transferase enzyme. A small amount of orally

administered glutathione may reach the portal circulation, but

apparently this is also rapidly metabolized by hepatic

gamma-glutamyltransferase. Thus, most studies have not observed a

significant increase in circulating glutathione following its oral

administration. However, there is an occasional study that does show an

increase in circulating glutathione after oral administration. Further,

there is some evidence that glutathione may be absorbed into the

enterocytes following ingestion, but may not be released by these cells

into the circulation. Research is needed to resolve the issue of

glutathione absorption.

, Duncan Crow <duncancrow

wrote:

>

> Thanks JoAnn, your post snipped below reflects the research that

> shows oral glutathione doesn't increase glutathione levels in

> humans, so glutathione precursors are required to increase

> glutathione in cells.

>

> Duncan

>

> > The authors of the study concluded " it is not feasible to increase

> > circulating glutathione to a clinically beneficial extent by the

oral

> > administrating of a single application of 3,000 mg of glutathione. "

> > Absorption of glutathione may be better in rats because unlike the

> > gastrointestinal tract of rats, the human gastrointestinal tract

> > contains significant amounts of an enzyme (gamma-

> > glutamyltranspeptidase) that breaks down glutathione.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, certainly I recognize that professional observation

and repetition of positive outcome is as valid as lab

measurements.

 

I commend your persistance in trying high-dose glutathione

despite the research showing negative results with its absorption

into the blood serum. What promoted your intuition to do it in

the first place would be a good question. Also, given the potency

of glutathione, I would have considered the 3 gram dose that

failed to increase circulating glutathione in humans in the lab

to be a moderately high dose anyway.

 

So, this leads to the obvious question -- What range of dose have

you been using in your high-dose regime? I can imagine it might

relate to body weight and disease condition but if you could give

us a ballpark figure it would help.

 

Would it be safe to say that perhaps circulating glutathione is

increased provided you first saturate the local cells of the

bowel lining that are known to absorb gutathione locally

according to studies?

 

Also, do you kow the source of the GSH; I mean can you satisfy

the vegans too? I don't believe veganism is practical but that

would be useful to a minority of clients who disagree.

 

Studies also indicate that most cell types do not absorb

glutathione directly, so when circulating glutathione is

increased the measured elevation in these cells is the result of

cellular glutathione-sparing rather than providing the neccesary

precursors to the cells so they can produce their own. Other

studies indicate that about 90% of the glutathione in the body is

used within the cells, not only for mitochondrial protection but

for energy production.

 

So, I'd appeciate your thoughts on high-dose glutathione PLUS

precursors to address the amount that has to be manufactured and

used in the cells, or good reason to say that generally these

cells might absorb GSH if the dose was high enough.

 

And if there's anything else you could add on this topic please

do, such as addessing the concern of a pro-oxidant effect of

excess antioxidant.

 

Again, I appeciate the dissemination of your field experience.

This is indeed useful.

 

Duncan Crow

 

 

,>

> Posted by: " greenteasupreme " greenteasupreme

> greenteasupreme Sun Oct 1, 2006 4:29 am (PDT)

>

> >

> I am a clinical Nutritionist. I have been using high dose oral

> Glutathione for ten years, The results have been outstanding. This

> often quoted study is part of a big lie. It was one study done on 7

> people. A single dose of 3 grams of Glutathione was given orally.Blood

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Guest guest

This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone, I'll switch. Rhoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

N-Acetyl Cysteine Powerful Antioxidant Amino Acid

 

 

In a message dated 4/13/2009 9:52:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, pgriff writes:

 

what is NAC ? thanks Pam

 

 

-

Rhoda Mead

oleander soup

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM

glutathione

 

 

This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone, I'll switch. Rhoda

 

 

Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009 5:53 AM

Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

what is NAC ? thanks Pam

 

 

-

Rhoda Mead

oleander soup

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM

glutathione

 

 

This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone, I'll switch. Rhoda

 

 

Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009 5:53 AM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

NAC stands for N-Acetyl Cysteine. One's body requires the Cysteine to make its own Glutathione which, in turn, is the master oxidant in all living things. Although one can take Glutathione directly, the digestive juices destroy most of it. NAC is probably the best way to increase Glutathione levels in body cells.

 

Marc Swanepoel

 

 

-

Pam Griffin

oleander soup

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:51 AM

Re: glutathione

 

 

 

what is NAC ? thanks Pam

 

 

-

Rhoda Mead

oleander soup

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM

glutathione

 

 

This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone, I'll switch. Rhoda

 

 

Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009 5:53 AM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Marc:

 

What about whey isolate which has high levels of cysteine?

 

oleander soup , " Marc Swanepoel - PhD " <marcswan

wrote:

>

> NAC stands for N-Acetyl Cysteine. One's body requires the Cysteine to make its

own Glutathione which, in turn, is the master oxidant in all living things.

Although one can take Glutathione directly, the digestive juices destroy most of

it. NAC is probably the best way to increase Glutathione levels in body cells.

>

> Marc Swanepoel

>

> -

> Pam Griffin

> oleander soup

> Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:51 AM

> Re: glutathione

what is NAC ? thanks Pam

>

> -

> Rhoda Mead

> oleander soup

> Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM

> glutathione

>

>

> This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less

expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone,

I'll switch. Rhoda

>

>

>

>

> ----------

>

>

>

> Checked by AVG.

> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009

5:53 AM

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

what is NAC?--- On Tue, 4/14/09, jrrjim <jim.mcelroy10 wrote:

jrrjim <jim.mcelroy10 Re: glutathioneoleander soup Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 8:41 AM

 

 

Marc:What about whey isolate which has high levels of cysteine?oleander soup, "Marc Swanepoel - PhD" <marcswan@.. .> wrote:>> NAC stands for N-Acetyl Cysteine. One's body requires the Cysteine to make its own Glutathione which, in turn, is the master oxidant in all living things. Although one can take Glutathione directly, the digestive juices destroy most of it. NAC is probably the best way to increase Glutathione levels in body cells.> > Marc Swanepoel> > - > Pam Griffin > oleander soup@

. com > Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:51 AM> Re: glutathione> > > > > > > what is NAC ? thanks Pam> > - > Rhoda Mead > oleander soup > Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM> glutathione> > > This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone, I'll switch. Rhoda> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > Checked by

AVG. > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009 5:53 AM>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Read down: NAC stands for N-Acytl Cysteine. It is a vital precurser for the

body to make glutathione, which is the body's master anti-oxidant. (I believe

Marc had a bit of a typo when he said " master oxidant " ). This anti-oxidant

works at the intra-cellular level, and, among other things, helps to recycle

vitamins C and e, greatly reducing the need for higher doses of these.

 

 

oleander soup , Lisa Tovar <tov_legsec wrote:

>

> what is NAC?

>

> --- On Tue, 4/14/09, jrrjim <jim.mcelroy10 wrote:

>

>

> jrrjim <jim.mcelroy10

> Re: glutathione

> oleander soup

> Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 8:41 AM

>

>

Marc:

>

> What about whey isolate which has high levels of cysteine?

>

> oleander soup, " Marc Swanepoel - PhD " <marcswan@ .>

wrote:

> >

> > NAC stands for N-Acetyl Cysteine. One's body requires the Cysteine to make

its own Glutathione which, in turn, is the master oxidant in all living things.

Although one can take Glutathione directly, the digestive juices destroy most of

it. NAC is probably the best way to increase Glutathione levels in body cells.

> >

> > Marc Swanepoel

> >

> > -

> > Pam Griffin

> > oleander soup

> > Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:51 AM

> > Re: glutathione

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > what is NAC ? thanks Pam

> >

> > -

> > Rhoda Mead

> > oleander soup

> > Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM

> > glutathione

> >

> >

> > This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less

expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone,

I'll switch. Rhoda

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> >

> >

> >

> > Checked by AVG.

> > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009

5:53 AM

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Undenatured whey isolate is also suitable to increase glutathione in the body. It is especially good for people with cancer who show signs of rapid weight loss (cachexia). And, as you have pointed out with my typo, it is an ANTI-OXIDANT and not an oxidant.

 

Marc Swanepoel

 

 

-

jrrjim

oleander soup

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:41 PM

Re: glutathione

 

 

Marc:What about whey isolate which has high levels of cysteine?oleander soup , "Marc Swanepoel - PhD" <marcswan wrote:>> NAC stands for N-Acetyl Cysteine. One's body requires the Cysteine to make its own Glutathione which, in turn, is the master oxidant in all living things. Although one can take Glutathione directly, the digestive juices destroy most of it. NAC is probably the best way to increase Glutathione levels in body cells.> > Marc Swanepoel> > - > Pam Griffin > oleander soup > Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:51 AM> Re: glutathione> > > > > > > what is NAC ? thanks Pam> > - > Rhoda Mead > oleander soup > Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:55 AM> glutathione> > > This group is a fabulous source of knowledge! NAC is certainly much less expensive than the liposomal G I'm taking right now. When my carton is gone, I'll switch. Rhoda> > > > > -------------------------> > > > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release 4/8/2009 5:53 AM>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...