(Navarro Test) Mouth ulcers/tooth and gum infections etc.

March 12, 2009

Hi Sue,

Regarding the Navarro test. I have personally been using the Navarro test

for over 4 years. My personal opinion is the Navarro test is extremely

useful for chronic cancer patients looking for valid warning signals of

cancer activity.

The key for me was getting the first test and then using it as a benchmark

for the subsequent tests. I don't believe the " 50 " cutoff for cancer is

necessarily correct for everyone. I think some individuals can have

cancer present with say a " 48 " index and other individuals could be clean

with a " 55 " index. What the Navarro test does very well is show a trend or

direction over a period of time. And, it seems Navarro gives a heads up

when things are headed the wrong way well in advance so you can take

corrective action in a timely manner.

Having had a dozen or more Navarro tests I have calculated my personal

midpoint to be 48.5 based on those tests. I currently Navarro test every

three months but am planning to stretch out to six months if my next test

comes back under 48.

Good Luck & Good Health,

Del

#################################################

Del (19+ Year fNHL Survivor)

E-Mail del

11-89 " Malignant lymphoma, follicular and

diffuse, small cleaved-cell type (Working

formulation). Malignant lymphoma, poorly

differentiated lymphocytic type, nodular

and diffuse (Rappaport). " - Stage IV

1-90 8xCHOP full remission confirmed.

9-90 Exercise and supplement regimen began.

7-05 Relapse - skin, lymph node above & below

abdomen.

9-05 Alternate /complementary regimen began.

1-06 Remission

7-08 Ocular fNHL - Stage III

8-08 Alternative /complementary regimen began

#################################################

-

" suepet60 " <suepet5

Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:34 AM

Re: Mouth ulcers/tooth and gum infections etc.

> Hi >

> Thanks for your candid opinion, it is a breath of fresh air. My

> experience was not good taking MMS internally - to the contrary. I tried

> my best to work up to the therapeutic dose, but could not tolerate it at

> anything above 10 drops twice a day.

>

> I seek peace and pursue it .... so thanks for the warning about the MMS

> forum being vicious!

>

> On the other hand, I have been on the Oleander protocol for 20 days now,

> with no ill effect physically - after MMS I almost feel that Oleander is

> not working for me because I am not sick all day! BUT I am determined to

> stick with it for the 60 days Marc suggested before doing another Navarro

> test.

>

> Has anybody else used the Navarro test, by the way? Just wondering how

> reliable it is because it is really the only way I have to see if what I

> am doing is working for me.

>

> Thank you all so much for the valuable discussions on this forum, and

> especially to Tony (for the book) and Marc for his persistence in making

> the product available to all of us desiring to work with nature, not

> against it.

>

> Sue

>

> ---

>

March 13, 2009

Where do you get these tests done?

Tammatha

-

Del at Dri-Wash

oleander soup

Thursday, March 12, 2009 3:35 PM

Re: Re: (Navarro Test) Mouth ulcers/tooth and gum infections etc.

Hi Sue,Regarding the Navarro test. I have personally been using the Navarro test for over 4 years. My personal opinion is the Navarro test is extremely useful for chronic cancer patients looking for valid warning signals of cancer activity.The key for me was getting the first test and then using it as a benchmark for the subsequent tests. I don't believe the "50" cutoff for cancer is necessarily correct for everyone. I think some individuals can have cancer present with say a "48" index and other individuals could be clean with a "55" index. What the Navarro test does very well is show a trend or direction over a period of time. And, it seems Navarro gives a heads up when things are headed the wrong way well in advance so you can take corrective action in a timely manner.Having had a dozen or more Navarro tests I have calculated my personal midpoint to be 48.5 based on those tests. I currently Navarro test every three months but am planning to stretch out to six months if my next test comes back under 48.Good Luck & Good Health,Del#################################################Del (19+ Year fNHL Survivor)E-Mail del (AT) driwash (DOT) us11-89 "Malignant lymphoma, follicular anddiffuse, small cleaved-cell type (Workingformulation). Malignant lymphoma, poorlydifferentiated lymphocytic type, nodularand diffuse (Rappaport)." - Stage IV1-90 8xCHOP full remission confirmed.9-90 Exercise and supplement regimen began.7-05 Relapse - skin, lymph node above & belowabdomen.9-05 Alternate /complementary regimen began.1-06 Remission7-08 Ocular fNHL - Stage III8-08 Alternative /complementary regimen began#################################################- "suepet60" <suepet5 (AT) comcast (DOT) net><oleander soup >Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:34 AM Re: Mouth ulcers/tooth and gum infections etc.> Hi Tony>> Thanks for your candid opinion, it is a breath of fresh air. My > experience was not good taking MMS internally - to the contrary. I tried > my best to work up to the therapeutic dose, but could not tolerate it at > anything above 10 drops twice a day.>> I seek peace and pursue it .... so thanks for the warning about the MMS > forum being vicious!>> On the other hand, I have been on the Oleander protocol for 20 days now, > with no ill effect physically - after MMS I almost feel that Oleander is > not working for me because I am not sick all day! BUT I am determined to > stick with it for the 60 days Marc suggested before doing another Navarro > test.>> Has anybody else used the Navarro test, by the way? Just wondering how > reliable it is because it is really the only way I have to see if what I > am doing is working for me.>> Thank you all so much for the valuable discussions on this forum, and > especially to Tony (for the book) and Marc for his persistence in making > the product available to all of us desiring to work with nature, not > against it.>> Sue>>>> --->>