Budwig and oleander - a proven winning combo

[Guest guest]

It might be the other way around. Dr. Budwig could have approved

using really high (IV) doses of vitamin C, because in this case it

plays a very different role of an extremely potent oxidant causing

oxidative stress in malignant cells, which cannot resist it given

sufficiently high concentrations are achieved, which, it turn, is the

main challenge of this therapy and why oral alternative is

practically futile.

 

BTW, I've read recently somewhere that it had been found some

combination that allowed reduce the necessary concentrations of

vitamin C in the blood, which made this (IV) therapy much more viable.

 

Best regards,

Nekto

 

oleander soup , " Dr. Loretta Lanphier "

<drlanphier wrote:

>

> I think the moderators are kind-of, sort-of becoming a bit more

flexible

> because hopefully they are realizing that much of the food-grade

> supplementation that we now offer is quite different than when Dr.

B made

> her initial recommendations. AND the fact that many that are

having good

> success are using supplements, herbs, etc. When I joined the FO/CC

group

> two years ago the mantra against any type of supplementation was

continually

> shouted from the roof-tops. ;o) However, the warning about HIGH

LEVELS of

> antioxidant supplements still stand and, in my opinion, there is

good reason

> for this. We don't know for sure what constitutes HIGH LEVELS but

I would

> " guess " something like using IV Vitamin C in 50-100 grams type of

thing.

> Again, only a guess as that protocol has been popular for a while

and Dr. B

> would have certainly known about this.

>

> The vitamin, mineral and enzyme content of our food has declined

radically

> since the 1950's when Dr. B first came out with her protocol. And

it has

> continued to get worse even in the last ten years. So the body

does not get

> near the support from a " diet only " approach to cancer.

>

>

>

> Be Well~

>

> Loretta Lanphier, ND, CN, HHP, CH

> Oasis Advanced Wellness

>

[Guest guest]

My personal feelings about high dose IV C is that it may not be very

cost effective. You can rack up a $3000 a month bill for the stuff

easily, and it doesn't always work. Sometimes it makes cancer

worse! Sometimes it doesn't make any difference, and sometimes it

helps.

 

If you go for IV C, I hope you have a way to closely monitor your

progress. If you are getting worse or making no progress, stop it

immediately and spend your money on other approaches, such as LDN,

Sutherlandia OPC, artemisinin, pancreatic enzymes, ABM mushroom

capsules, a juicer, etc etc. In fact, if you have ten grand to throw

at the problem, instead of 3 months of IV C, you might try out a

really good clinic. But do your research first and be very careful.

 

oleander soup , " vdrozdovsky " <vdrozdovsky

wrote:

>

> It might be the other way around. Dr. Budwig could have approved

> using really high (IV) doses of vitamin C, because in this case it

> plays a very different role of an extremely potent oxidant causing

> oxidative stress in malignant cells, which cannot resist it given

> sufficiently high concentrations are achieved, which, it turn, is

the

> main challenge of this therapy and why oral alternative is

> practically futile.

>

> BTW, I've read recently somewhere that it had been found some

> combination that allowed reduce the necessary concentrations of

> vitamin C in the blood, which made this (IV) therapy much more

viable.

>

> Best regards,

> Nekto

>

> oleander soup , " Dr. Loretta Lanphier "

> <drlanphier@> wrote:

> >

> > I think the moderators are kind-of, sort-of becoming a bit more

> flexible

> > because hopefully they are realizing that much of the food-grade

> > supplementation that we now offer is quite different than when

Dr.

> B made

> > her initial recommendations. AND the fact that many that are

> having good

> > success are using supplements, herbs, etc. When I joined the

FO/CC

> group

> > two years ago the mantra against any type of supplementation was

> continually

> > shouted from the roof-tops. ;o) However, the warning about HIGH

> LEVELS of

> > antioxidant supplements still stand and, in my opinion, there is

> good reason

> > for this. We don't know for sure what constitutes HIGH LEVELS

but

> I would

> > " guess " something like using IV Vitamin C in 50-100 grams type of

> thing.

> > Again, only a guess as that protocol has been popular for a while

> and Dr. B

> > would have certainly known about this.

> >

> > The vitamin, mineral and enzyme content of our food has declined

> radically

> > since the 1950's when Dr. B first came out with her protocol.

And

> it has

> > continued to get worse even in the last ten years. So the body

> does not get

> > near the support from a " diet only " approach to cancer.

> >

> >

> >

> > Be Well~

> >

> > Loretta Lanphier, ND, CN, HHP, CH

> > Oasis Advanced Wellness

> >

>