Nuclear radiation

[Guest guest]

Perhaps this is why so many of the alternatives are not working, for me and many others! I feel so enraged, so helpless! Any inputs about how to rid oneself of radiation?Why Marin County Has The Highest Breast Cancer Rates In The USBy Leuren Moret3-3-8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BY LEUREN MORET RADIOACTIVE TIMES VOL. 6 NO. 2 March 2008

 

RIVERBANKS AND COASTLINES HAVE HIGHEST CANCER RATES

Fresh water has higher concentrations of radionuclides than seawater because there is a greater dilution factor in seawater, and salts in seawater control uptake of radionuclides. It is clear that dilution is not the solution to pollution. Dumping radioactive contaminated materials into bodies of water has a boomerang effect. It is not long before the radiation is washing back up on riverbanks and shorelines. In fact, in the first cancer mapping survey in history (1850-60) in the Lake District of Britain, Alfred Haviland reported that the highest cancer rates (from natural background radiation) were along riverbanks and shorelines providing a strong environmental link to cancer before manmade radiation was introduced into the environment after 1900. Pre-1900 cancer rates represent the true baseline for cancer studies.

The chance discovery of an abstract in the Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, " Radiocesium in North San Francisco Bay and Baja California coastal surface waters " , provided me with an answer to a puzzling question about breast cancer. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent by the University of California to identify the cause of what may be the highest breast cancer rates in the United States in Marin County, California, just north of San Francisco.

 

Fig. 1: San Francisco Bay Area, with Marin County in upper left corner.

Even more surprising, the radiocesium reported in the paper had been measured by the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab, from the north end of San Francisco Bay to the coastal waters at the tip of Baja California, Mexico. By mapping the pattern of breast cancer in Marin County, I identified the San Francisco Bay shoreline of the Marin County peninsula as the environment where the highest rates of breast cancer occur in the county. The deepest part of San Francisco Bay is offshore from Marin, and the highest volume of sediment-laden water passes through this area each day with the tides. The lowest breast cancer rates are along the Pacific coastline of Marin. The spatial distribution of breast cancer made it clear that there had to be an environmental cause. Large areas of mudflats and estuaries along the bay side shoreline of Marin, like the Welsh seacoast, provide a low energy environment for radioactive contaminated fine sediments to settle out.

 

CONTAMINATION OF REGIONAL WATER SUPPLIES

Most of the fresh water coming into San Francisco Bay is from the Sierra Nevada Mountains east of the California coastline, a very high mountain range running north and south along the border with Nevada. The soils of the Sierras are now contaminated with radioactive materials from nuclear bomb testing, Chernobyl, and the emissions from the Rancho Seco nuclear power plant, which operated east of San Francisco until it was shut down in 1989. Most of the drinking water for the San Francisco Bay area comes from the Sierras. Approximately 95% of the radioactive emissions from Rancho Seco were rained and snowed out into the Sierra Nevada Mountains. During the lawsuit, which eventually shut down Rancho Seco nuclear power plant in 1989, the citizens who owned the Sacramento municipal power company contracted with Lawrence Livermore nuclear weapons lab to measure fission product emissions in the Rancho Seco environment. I obtained the Livermore radiation reports and communications with lawyers, from Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass who had been an expert witness on the lawsuit. It was a surprise to discover that Livermore nuclear weapons lab has not only secretly conducted extensive global monitoring of radiation for decades, but local radiation monitoring as well. In fact, I saw fresh samples from Hiroshima and Nagasaki lying on a table in a Livermore environmental laboratory in 1991. When I asked why they were still monitoring Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I was told " Because they are still radioactive. "

 

LIVERMORE NUKE LAB SECRETLY MONITORING GLOBAL RAD LEVELS

Livermore nuclear weapons lab reported measuring one Curie of radiocesium per year, passing through San Francisco Bay attached to fine sediment. Clay particles are highly charged and act as scavenging agents for radioactive particles suspended in water. This has been a chronic and cumulative source of low-level radiation washing up daily on the San Francisco Bay side of the Marin shoreline for at least 60 years ­ since bomb testing started. The European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) report has stated that chronic exposure to low-level radiation is " up to 1000 times more biologically damaging than the ICRP standards and risk model predict " . The ICRP standards and risk model are based on the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bomb studies, which were deceptively conducted by the U.S. Government. Radiocesium is just one of hundreds of radionuclides produced in the fission process, which means far more radiation has been washing through north San Francisco Bay than the 1 Curie of cesium reported in the Livermore report. Even worse, the public health impact from global pollution by depleted uranium, was not officially measured or reported from bomb testing, but someone must have been monitoring it. All atomic and hydrogen bombs have large amounts of depleted uranium packed as " tamping " around the small plutonium core weighing less than 20 lbs. A global diabetes epidemic is the result primarily of the uranium pollution which is particularly damaging to the pancreas and insulin function. Pancreatic cancer mortality in Japanese males increased 12-fold between 1945 and 1965, during the peak of atmospheric testing.

 

 

Fig. 2: Trend of mortality rate from pancreatic cancer in Japan (Males) for the period prior to and following the release of fission products into the environment. " From M. Segi, M. Kurihara, and T. Matsuyama, " Cancer Mortality in Japan (1899-1962) " , Department of Public Health, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 1965.

MARIN COUNTY: A NATURAL CONTROL STUDY

The Marin County study is the kind of natural experiment geoscientists find useful in their research, with the Pacific coastline as a natural control and San Francisco Bay mudflats in Marin County as the study area. It is also a good comparison of the public health effects of radionuclide concentrations in contaminated freshwater compared to seawater. When the mud samples from the Marin County bay side shoreline and the Pacific coastline are analyzed, low-level radiation from the Sierras will be identified as the cause of what may be the highest breast cancer incidence in the United States. High rates of autism also occur in areas, between the Sierras and Marin County, in low energy environments where swampy still water and mudflats occur and are recharged with contaminated water washing down from the Sierras. Radiation in the environment has a cumulative effect.

I'M THE " MOUSE LADY "

The University of California, as the unchallenged manager for 61 years of the nuclear weapons program at Los Alamos National Lab, Lawrence Livermore Lab, and Lawrence Berkeley Lab, has received billions of dollars to make a global radioactive environmental mess, hundreds of millions of dollars more to " study " the breast cancer clusters in Marin County, and has still failed to identify the cause. Yet, during a breast cancer conference on January 21, 2006, by the Bay Area Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Center (BABCERC), Dr. Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff from the Lawrence Berkeley Lab, who introduced herself as " the mouse lady " , stated very clearly during her presentation to 600 women, that " radiation is the only known cause of breast cancer in mice " . She spoke repeatedly in her talk about her experiments on mice, saying " Radiation is the only known cause of breast cancer in mice and that is why I use it to cause breast cancer in mice. " She said they never identified the cause of breast cancer in women.

THE MOUSE THAT ROARED

When it was time for questions, I held up an enlarged breast cancer map using US Government data, which identified a 100-mile radius from nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons labs as the location of 2/3 of all breast cancer deaths in the United States from 1985-89.

Fig. 3: Left ­ High-risk counties within 100 miles of nuclear reactors where 2/3 of breast cancer deaths occurred 1985-1989. Source: J. Gould, The Enemy Within: The High Cost of Living Near Nuclear Reactors, Four Walls Eight Windows, NY/London (1996), p.187. Right - Nuclear power plant locations in the U.S. Source: " The Madness of Nuclear Energy " , The Ecologist, Vol. 29 No. 7, November 1999, back cover.

I asked the speaker, Dr. Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff, if BABCERC was investigating radiation as a cause of breast cancer around these sites. She quickly replied, " Oh, I'm a microbiologist! " distancing herself from exposing radiation as the obvious cause.

The University of California will forever be known as the University that poisoned the world.

References

Haviland, A., The geographical distribution of heart disease and dropsy, cancer in females and phthisis in females in England and Wales, London: Swan Schonnenschein, 1875. Volpe, A.M., B.B. Bandong, B.K. Esser, G.M. Bianchini, " Radiocesium in North San Francisco Bay and Baja California coastal surface waters " , Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 60 (2002) 365-380. http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2002/Radiocesium-San-Francisco-Bay16mar02.htm Laurie, J., " Alarming breast cancer rates in northern California county " , World Socialist Web, Oct. 31, 2002. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/canc-o31.shtml Volpe, et al., 2002. " ECRR: 2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk " , Regulator's Edit.: Brussels, 2003, p.182. Glasstone, S., The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Dept. of the Army Pamphlet No. 50-3, Headquarters Dept. of the Army, March 1977, p. 15 sec. 1.50. Segi, M., M. Kurihara, T. Matsuyama, " Cancer Mortality in Japan (1899-1962) " , Department of Public Health, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 1965. Fowler, J.M., Fallout: A Study of Superbombs, Strontium 90, and Survival, Basic Books NY, 1960, p. 59 Fig. 11. Nichols, B., " Breast cancer meeting fails people of Hunters Point, San Francisco, Marin County " , Indybay.org, January 26, 2006. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/01/28/17987821.php

[Guest guest]

Rhoda that is ghastly! We are south of Mururoa Atoll where the French used to (safely, they said - cynical hoot of laughter) test underground. For some reason they were not safe enough to test in their own back yard. The atoll has cracked up and breast cancer rates which used to be 1:12 are now 1:3 in NZ, so we are told. (This may just be hype to get us to line up for carcinogenic mammograms. Who can believe official figures on anything?)Our esteemed govt at the time, which brought in a "nuclear free" policy (but continued to nuke food and people in hospitals throughout the land), sent a frigate with a crew of about 250 including reporters and a couple of gung ho politicians to watch over a small flotilla of protest vessels. The crew were volunteers

- but no one refused to go of course. Many are dead from cancer - same old compensation/denial story as agent orange. No civilian protesters have tried to claim compensation.I believe there was a real dip in breast cancer rates in Israel after they banned organochlorine pesticides outright. Other countries followed suit years later, BUT allowed the chem companies to use stockpiles - some of which lasted another 20 years. Then officials would say, Can't be the organochlorines - they're banned! Fork- tongued rotters! Same old story as dioxin.Our nuclear free policy is ridiculous - a sham, when we poison our own.I understand your feelings of helplessness. Sometimes I think that the lobbyists are having such a laugh at the public's expense, yet they crap in their own nest - we only have this one poor old world. www.radiationdetox.com/proliberty.com/observer/20050826.htm Graves Disease (thyroid) archivesA Herbal Healer Academy -Radiation Detox Radiation Exposure Response and Natural DetoxificationLove,Maracuja--- On

Fri, 1/23/09, Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541 wrote:Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541 Nuclear radiationoleander soup Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 10:35 PM

 

Perhaps this is why so many of the alternatives are not working, for me and many others! I feel so enraged, so helpless! Any inputs about how to rid oneself of radiation?

[Guest guest]

Hi Rhoda. Cell Food was sent to Russia after Chernobyl to help take radiation out of the body. This was the original Cell Food, by

http://www.nuscience.com/cellfood.htm

 

They don't directly sell it, but you can buy it at any health food store now. You may want to search on line to see if you can get it cheaper. Just make sure it has the same ingredients as the original Cell Food, such as this place, which I think has the same price as the health food store

http://www.luminahealth.com/products/cellfood.htm

 

At one time you had to join a company to buy Cell Food, but now it is in most health food stores. They don't talk about the radiation removal, because you can't claim that type of thing anymore, and they didn't really even talk much about it back then. But when I first heard of Cell Food, about 10 years ago, I was told that Everett Storey made this for the government. He was researching a way to make water safe for our soldiers in other lands. When he discovered this it did so much more than make water safe, and that the government owned the paten on it for years and used it for all drinking water. Then the paten was either turned it back to Storey, or sold to the manufacturer. It's been a long time so I can't clearly remember. Anyway, our government send gallons of this to Russia for Chernobyl victims.

 

And I do have to say, I try many products just to see what effect they have on me, and very few do. I guess because I'm pretty healthy. But--I had an immediate response to Cell Food, in that I had bad asthma as a child and have always had slightly compromised lungs as an adult. Cell Food immediately opened my lungs and made breathing, even in exercise, SO much easier. Plus about 3 months after using it daily the calluses on my heels were gone! I have had very super thick ridges of callus along the edge of my heels all my adult life. They get very deep cracks in them too, though they have never bled. After 3 months on Cell Food (which was the ONLY thing different I had done or taken in that time frame) the calluses started peeling off, revealing soft pink normal skin underneath! I could not believe it. And so long as I continued to take Cell Food, my feet (and lungs) stayed normal.

 

Then, the company I was buying Cell Food from (they bought from the original maker above and repackaged it under their own name) started diluting the formula to make more profit, and the formula quit working. I found this out after. I had just assumed that my body had finally gotten all the benefit from Cell Food that it could because I no longer got any lung help from it, and the calluses started growing back, so I quit taking it. I met a man that use to be on the board of the company I bought from, and he told me he quit the company because they were diluting the formula for profit. And by the time I met him and found this out, the original formula started being carried in health food stores. So now you can go in just about anywhere and buy it. You don't have to belong to an mlm company to get it.

 

I see they now say 8 drops 3 times a day--before it was 7 drops 3 times a day. Guess they figure water and our chemical exposures have gotten even worse in 10 years. :-) If you get diarrhea on it (as I know you are prone to, and some people do experience this) just back off the number of drops. This is due, like MMS, to die off of pathogens.

 

But that is about the only thing I know that is actually for radiation removal, though of course there may be other things. But I am thinking that if our government sent it to Russia, they must have felt it was vital for radiation poisoning.

 

Samala,

Renee

 

 

 

 

----

 

 

 

Perhaps this is why so many of the alternatives are not working, for me and many others! I feel so enraged, so helpless! Any inputs about how to rid oneself of radiation?

[Guest guest]

Another thought - a product was used successfully after Chernobyl, that had originally been developed for the Russian army as a protective against biological warfare. Apparently it was successfully used after a couple of biological "accidents" including an anthrax scare in 1979. (I wonder if their "accidents" are like the Wests'.)I think it is based on lactobacillus rhamnosus strain in raw milk and is excellent for any illness resulting in a weakened immune system. Apparently its effect is regulatory rather than over-stimulatory. Don't know if I'm allowed to mention the product, but I think I may give it a try myself, for eczema. Another good point, it's not MLM! Email me if you want a URL.Love,Maracuja--- On Sat, 1/24/09, Maracuja <howdurdago wrote:Maracuja <howdurdagoRe: Nuclear radiationoleander soup Date: Saturday, January 24, 2009, 4:06 AM

 

Rhoda that is ghastly! We are south of Mururoa Atoll where the French used to (safely, they said - cynical hoot of laughter) test underground. For some reason they were not safe enough to test in their own back yard. The atoll has cracked up and breast cancer rates which used to be 1:12 are now 1:3 in NZ, so we are told. (This may just be hype to get us to line up for carcinogenic mammograms. Who can believe official figures on anything?)Our esteemed govt at the time, which brought in a "nuclear free" policy (but continued to nuke food and people

in hospitals throughout the land), sent a frigate with a crew of about 250 including reporters and a couple of gung ho politicians to watch over a small flotilla of protest vessels. The crew were volunteers

- but no one refused to go of course. Many are dead from cancer - same old compensation/ denial story as agent orange. No civilian protesters have tried to claim compensation.I believe there was a real dip in breast cancer rates in Israel after they banned organochlorine pesticides outright. Other countries followed suit years later, BUT allowed the chem companies to use stockpiles - some of which lasted another 20 years. Then officials would say, Can't be the organochlorines - they're banned! Fork- tongued rotters! Same old story as dioxin.Our nuclear free policy is ridiculous - a sham, when we poison our own.I understand your feelings of helplessness. Sometimes I think that the lobbyists are having such a laugh at the public's expense, yet they crap in their own nest - we only have this one poor old world. www.radiationdetox. com/proliberty.com/ observer/ 20050826. htm Graves Disease (thyroid) archivesA Herbal Healer Academy -Radiation Detox Radiation Exposure Response and Natural DetoxificationLove,Maracuja--- On

Fri, 1/23/09, Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541@ gmail.com> wrote:Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541@ gmail.com> Nuclear radiationoleander soupFriday, January 23, 2009, 10:35 PM

 

Perhaps this is why so many of the alternatives are not working, for me and many others! I feel so enraged, so helpless! Any inputs about how to rid oneself of radiation?

[Guest guest]

Why do you think ex-pres W Bush put the waters around the Mariana Islands under

the protective environment law? When the US closed its bases in Germany, it

buried all its bombs there in the Pacific Ocean by Marianas Islands which is

under the US Trust Territories, no one wants to take those bombs. Sure it

leaked, the cancer rate in Marianas Islands now is incomprehensible. Now, no

one is allowed to fish or take any sea products from that area. And everybody

thought he was preserving the environment of MI!!!

 

Melly

[Guest guest]

This doesn't make any sense at all. U235 and plutonium are incredibly

expensive to make, and if the government were disposing these bombs,

they would most certainly salvage that material -- actually for

several different reasons.

 

Now, I do think that the Marianas were used as above ground testing

sites for nuclear weapons back when that was legal, which would

account for high levels of radiation there.

 

oleander soup , Melly Bag <tita_mel wrote:

>

> Why do you think ex-pres W Bush put the waters around the Mariana

Islands under the protective environment law? When the US closed its

bases in Germany, it buried all its bombs there in the Pacific Ocean

by Marianas Islands which is under the US Trust Territories, no one

wants to take those bombs. Sure it leaked, the cancer rate in

Marianas Islands now is incomprehensible. Now, no one is allowed to

fish or take any sea products from that area. And everybody thought

he was preserving the environment of MI!!!

>

> Melly

>

[Guest guest]

is this simular to StemTech? They also sent this to Chernoble it is from the Algie on a lake on Oregon

Ruella

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Rhoda. Cell Food was sent to Russia after Chernobyl to help take radiation out of the body. This was the original Cell Food, by

http://www.nuscience.com/cellfood.htm

 

They don't directly sell it, but you can buy it at any health food store now. You may want to search on line to see if you can get it cheaper. Just make sure it has the same ingredients as the original Cell Food, such as this place, which I think has the same price as the health food store

http://www.luminahealth.com/products/cellfood.htm

 

At one time you had to join a company to buy Cell Food, but now it is in most health food stores. They don't talk about the radiation removal, because you can't claim that type of thing anymore, and they didn't really even talk much about it back then. But when I first heard of Cell Food, about 10 years ago, I was told that Everett Storey made this for the government. He was researching a way to make water safe for our soldiers in other lands. When he discovered this it did so much more than make water safe, and that the government owned the paten on it for years and used it for all drinking water. Then the paten was either turned it back to Storey, or sold to the manufacturer. It's been a long time so I can't clearly remember. Anyway, our government send gallons of this to Russia for Chernobyl victims.

 

And I do have to say, I try many products just to see what effect they have on me, and very few do. I guess because I'm pretty healthy. But--I had an immediate response to Cell Food, in that I had bad asthma as a child and have always had slightly compromised lungs as an adult. Cell Food immediately opened my lungs and made breathing, even in exercise, SO much easier. Plus about 3 months after using it daily the calluses on my heels were gone! I have had very super thick ridges of callus along the edge of my heels all my adult life. They get very deep cracks in them too, though they have never bled. After 3 months on Cell Food (which was the ONLY thing different I had done or taken in that time frame) the calluses started peeling off, revealing soft pink normal skin underneath! I could not believe it. And so long as I continued to take Cell Food, my feet (and lungs) stayed no rmal.

 

Then, the company I was buying Cell Food from (they bought from the original maker above and repackaged it under their own name) started diluting the formula to make more profit, and the formula quit working. I found this out after. I had just assumed that my body had finally gotten all the benefit from Cell Food that it could because I no longer got any lung help from it, and the calluses started growing back, so I quit taking it. I met a man that use to be on the board of the company I bought from, and he told me he quit the company because they were diluting the formula for profit. And by the time I met him and found this out, the original formula started being carried in health food stores. So now you can go in just about anywhere and buy it. You don't have to belong to an mlm company to get it.

 

I see they now say 8 drops 3 times a day--before it was 7 drops 3 times a day. Guess they figure water and our chemical exposures have gotten even worse in 10 years. :-) If you get diarrhea on it (as I know you are prone to, and some people do experience this) just back off the number of drops. This is due, like MMS, to die off of pathogens.

 

But that is about the only thing I know that is actually for radiation removal, though of course there may be other things. But I am thinking that if our government sent it to Russia, they must have felt it was vital for radiation poisoning.

 

Samala,

Renee

 

 

 

 

----

 

 

 

Perhaps this is why so many of the alternatives are not working, for me and many others! I feel so enraged, so helpless! Any inputs about how to rid oneself of radiation?

[Guest guest]

No, they are 2 different products, totally.

 

Samala,

Renee

 

 

----

 

Is this simular to StemTech? They also sent this to Chernoble it is from the Algie on a lake on Oregon

Ruella

 

[Guest guest]

I remember distinctly Hawaii protested against it being put in the Pacific Ocean

near them, and Clinton announced it would go to Mariana Islands.

 

Melly

[Guest guest]

Clinoptilolite (zeolite) will remove radioactive substances.

 

http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN & cpsidt=18862464

 

http://tinyurl.com/c8296j

 

http://www.springerlink.com/content/6w8312532804711q/

 

Ruth

 

oleander soup , Maracuja <howdurdago wrote:

>

> Another thought - a product  was used successfully after Chernobyl,

that had originally been developed for the Russian army as a

protective against biological warfare. Apparently it was successfully

used after a couple of biological " accidents " including an anthrax

scare in 1979. (I wonder if their " accidents " are like the Wests'.)

> I think it is based on lactobacillus rhamnosus strain in raw milk

and is excellent for any illness resulting in a weakened immune system.

> Apparently its effect is regulatory rather than over-stimulatory.

Don't know if I'm allowed to mention the product, but I think I may

give it a try myself, for eczema. Another good point, it's not MLM!

Email me if you want a URL.

> Love,

> Maracuja

>

>

>  

>

[Guest guest]

Please send me the URL for this.

Thanks in advance

Ruth

 

-

Maracuja

oleander soup

Sunday, January 25, 2009 2:59 AM

Re: Nuclear radiation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another thought - a product was used successfully after Chernobyl, that had originally been developed for the Russian army as a protective against biological warfare. Apparently it was successfully used after a couple of biological "accidents" including an anthrax scare in 1979. (I wonder if their "accidents" are like the Wests'.)I think it is based on lactobacillus rhamnosus strain in raw milk and is excellent for any illness resulting in a weakened immune system. Apparently its effect is regulatory rather than over-stimulatory. Don't know if I'm allowed to mention the product, but I think I may give it a try myself, for eczema. Another good point, it's not MLM! Email me if you want a URL.Love,Maracuja--- On Sat, 1/24/09, Maracuja <howdurdago > wrote:

Maracuja <howdurdago >Re: Nuclear radiationoleander soup Date: Saturday, January 24, 2009, 4:06 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rhoda that is ghastly! We are south of Mururoa Atoll where the French used to (safely, they said - cynical hoot of laughter) test underground. For some reason they were not safe enough to test in their own back yard. The atoll has cracked up and breast cancer rates which used to be 1:12 are now 1:3 in NZ, so we are told. (This may just be hype to get us to line up for carcinogenic mammograms. Who can believe official figures on anything?)Our esteemed govt at the time, which brought in a "nuclear free" policy (but continued to nuke food and people in hospitals throughout the land), sent a frigate with a crew of about 250 including reporters and a couple of gung ho politicians to watch over a small flotilla of protest vessels. The crew were volunteers - but no one refused to go of course. Many are dead from cancer - same old compensation/ denial story as agent orange. No civilian protesters have tried to claim compensation.I believe there was a real dip in breast cancer rates in Israel after they banned organochlorine pesticides outright. Other countries followed suit years later, BUT allowed the chem companies to use stockpiles - some of which lasted another 20 years. Then officials would say, Can't be the organochlorines - they're banned! Fork- tongued rotters! Same old story as dioxin.Our nuclear free policy is ridiculous - a sham, when we poison our own.I understand your feelings of helplessness. Sometimes I think that the lobbyists are having such a laugh at the public's expense, yet they crap in their own nest - we only have this one poor old world. www.radiationdetox. com/proliberty.com/ observer/ 20050826. htmGraves Disease (thyroid) archivesA Herbal Healer Academy -Radiation DetoxRadiation Exposure Response and Natural DetoxificationLove,Maracuja--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541@ gmail.com> wrote:

Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541@ gmail.com> Nuclear radiationoleander soupFriday, January 23, 2009, 10:35 PM

 

 

Perhaps this is why so many of the alternatives are not working, for me and many others! I feel so enraged, so helpless! Any inputs about how to rid oneself of radiation?