Selenium in the L-selenomethonine form

[Guest guest]

L-selenomethonine is not neccessarily bad - it depends on the source.

 

Methylselenocysteine does appear to be the best form, but that does

not mean that L-selenomethonine from a reputable source is not good.

 

To me, it is just more likely that the L-selenomethonine used in the

halted SELECT trial was an inferior by-product of some kind of

industrial mining and perhaps even adulterated from the ores and

mining process (I shudder to think of taking selenium that came from

lead mining!). Since a vastly inferior synthetic petroleum derivative

was chosen for the Vitamin-E in the study, I am also highly suspect

about what kind of crude and possibly adulterated source of

L-selenomethonine they utilized.

 

Given the source of your selenium product, my advice is to keep taking

what you have and then later replace it with the Methylselenocysteine.

 

 

 

oleander soup , " Nelly C. " <nellycave wrote:

>

>

> I was interested in this post as I had just recently got my husband

on the TRC selenium that Utopia sell on their website. I ordered them

with my cs order but the label says L-selenomethonine.  

> I am hoping to find Brasil nuts locally as the Xmas season starts

soon but in the meantime wanted to get my husband on selenium for his

CD4s. Am I right in thinking that he should be taking the type of

selenium that is best for cancer even though he has a different problem?

> Tony posted on this previously too.

> From what I understand from the various posts, it looks as if the

selenium I got from Utopia is not the best type to be taking. I would

appreciate any feedback here.

> Thanks

> Nelly

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks, will do as suggested.

Nely