Cities Dumping toxic waste chemicals in drinking water...

[Guest guest]

InfoNature-International/message/253

 

::

HUMAN HEALTH - TOXIC DRINKING WATER ::

 

GOVERNMENTS AND ENTERPRISES ARE

DUMPING TOXIC WASTE CHEMICALS ON DRINKING WATER

www.fluoridealert.org

 

* * *

Cities

Fluoridating Drinking Water with Toxic Chemicals

 

NewsTarget.com

 

http://www.newstarget.com/005900.htm

By: Mike Adams - March 31, 2005

Toxic waste chemicals are disposed of by feeding to humans,

then

calling it fluoride.

If I told you you could have great-looking skin by eating skin

cream, you'd think I was crazy, but that's exactly what

dentists

are telling you when they say people should ingest fluoride in

order to improve the health of their teeth. Fluoride is a

topical

treatment. When natural mineral fluoride is placed onto

the

surface of your tooth enamel, it helps remineralize that

enamel,

thus improving your resistance to cavities.

But to

swallow

fluoride in order to treat your teeth is a lot like swallowing

hair coloring chemicals to change the color of your

hair.

If you're going to treat the area with the topical treatment,

you're

not supposed to swallow it. You're supposed to put it in

contact

with the surface needing treatment.

The whole argument about fluoridating public water supplies

brings

out, I think, the worst of organized medicine and organized

dentistry. It shows the egotistical, power-hungry nature of

the

American Dental Association and those dentists who follow its

dangerous philosophy of demanding that people swallow

bioactive

substances on command -- " for their own good, " of course.

 

With

the fluoridation argument, a few people in authority positions

want to force every single citizen of this country to be medicated

on

a psychoactive, biologically active substance without having

any

medical diagnosis, with no public warnings of side effects,

and

with no real studies to back up its efficacy.

But that's just the

beginning of this story...

To make matters even worse, it's not that municipalities are

actually dripping genuine fluoride into the water supplies in

the

first place -- they're largely using fluorosilicic acid, which,

as

I've covered before, is actually a toxic waste product produced

in

the smokestacks of various industrial chemical producers. If

they

weren't selling this substance to cities, they would have to pay

a

lot of money to have it handled as an environmental hazard and

buried in EPA-approved landfills.

Thus,

it is

illegal to take this fluorosilicic acid and bury it in

the ground or dump it in rivers or streams in this country, but

it

is perfectly legal to sell it to cities that drip it into the

water

supply with the intended purpose of it being ingested by human

beings. And those human beings, of course, eventually

pass

the fluoride through their bodies and directly into the rivers

and

streams. Thus, it

brings us to this bizarre reality of

fluoridation:

this

environmentally hazardous, toxic substance is

illegal to dump into rivers and streams, unless it passes

through

the bodies of human beings first, in which case it's not only

perfectly legal, it's actually demanded by ADA dentists.

That's a pretty

bizarre situation. (Of course, these are the same

people who are still putting mercury into peoples' mouths, so

what

did you expect?)

I'll hand it to the dentistry community on this one: they sure

have come up with a creative way to get rid of toxic waste

chemicals without using landfill -- just sell 'em to cities

and

call it a " public health policy! " Brilliant

marketing. Seriously.

Think about it: now instead of dumping toxic waste products

into

landfills where the chemicals leach into the groundwater

supplies

and get consumed by people, these toxic chemicals get consumed

by

people first, then they get flushed into the rivers and

streams.

It reminds me of the beef industry, where one of the

USDA-approved

feed ingredients for cows is, believe it or not, " chicken

litter. "

(I'm not making this up.) Apparently, there's no good way to

get

rid of all that chicken excrement unless you feed it to cows.

You

can look this up on the USDA website if you don't believe me.

Here's a Google search that will bring up some articles on it.

With fluoridation, the American public is basically being

treated

like cattle. Here: eat some industrial waste products for us,

please! Meanwhile, we're going to feed chicken excrement to

cows,

and then you can eat the cows after that, too! Heck, with

enough

segments in the food chain, they can get American consumers to

eventually eat just about anything.

Back to fluoride, keep in mind that all the public debate

about

fluoride isn't even about fluoride in the first place, because

most cities that claim to be dripping " natural " fluoride

into the

water supply aren't even buying natural fluoride to begin

with.

They're buying the toxic waste product fluorosilicic acid and

using that instead. Why? Basically because it's cheaper and

it

starts with the letters f-l-u-o-r, meaning they can pass it off

as

fluoride since most people don't know the difference. (There's

a

sad and disturbing history of mass populations being poisoned

with

things that start with " f-l-u-o-r, " by the way. Fluorine

gas,

anyone?)

I was just thinking if we used the American Dental Association

approach of eating everything that's supposed to be a topical

treatment, then we could revolutionize the cosmetic industry.

 

Women could eat lipstick to make their lips turn red. People

could

eat deodorant to stop body odor. And we could just eat

shampoo

instead of actually washing our hair.

Maybe the American

Dental

Association label of approval will be found on these products

as

well. Maybe people should just start eating toothpaste instead

of

brushing their teeth with it, because certainly a lot of

children

eat toothpaste already, and many of those children suffer from

dental fluorosis as a result. (A lot of senior citizens in

this

country also suffer from hip fractures and bone loss due partly

to

an overdose of fluoride.)

Or let's take a different track and follow the line of thinking

of

the American Dental Association -- let's mass medicate the

entire

population with lots of other drugs. Why stop at fluoride?

Why

don't we drip antidepressants into the water supply, and that

way

we can have more people committing violent acts and suicide --

documented side effects of antidepressants.

Why don't

we drip

statin drugs into the water supply so that we can lower the

HDL

cholesterol of every citizen in this country? Believe

it or not,

that has actually been suggested by some

doctors. They

think

we should mass medicate the entire population with a number of

biochemically active drugs, with or without their consent.

Fluoride could be just the beginning! The public waterways

could

be a genuine chemical cocktail... that is, if they weren't already.

 

All this demonstrates how egomaniacal and power-hungry

organized

dentistry is today. These people want to force drugs into the

bodies of people, and they want to do it through a system of

subterfuge that drips these drugs slowly into the water

supply.

That way people are taking these drugs whether they know it or

not, and they don't even need a prescription.

I

think the American Dental Association members and supporting

dentists may have been dripping a little too much fluoride

into

their own water, because they've apparently gone mad with the

idea

that everyone needs fluoride in order to have healthy teeth.

 

If you want fluoride, rub it on your teeth for a few minutes and

then

spit it out -- don't drink it. It's a topical

treatment, folks.

You wouldn't eat lipstick or deodorant or shampoo -- why are

you

eating fluoride in unmonitored quantities?

Finally, given that

drinking fluorosilicic acid helps industrial

companies get rid of a toxic waste product, shouldn't you get

paid

something for helping them dispose of this EPA-regulated

substance?

If you're

going to feed poison to the American public,

at least offer to pay them something for it. Right now,

cities are

being charged for this stuff. Frankly, industrial companies

should

be paying cities for their help in getting rid of it. Then

those

cities should turn around and pay the citizens for being

willing

to swallow it. " Here, I'll give you a dollar if you

drink this! "

You'd be amazed how

many people would say yes. Think about the

possibilities: you could solve the whole Yucca Mountain problem

in

Nevada by feeding radioactive waste to the American

public!

Or, if that didn't work, just feed it to the chickens and

cows!

(Don't laugh. There's probably some bureaucrat somewhere that

takes the idea seriously.)

 

Source:

 

http://www.newstarget.com/005900.html

 

http://www.organicconsumers.org/foodsafety/fluoride40105.cfm

 

 

InfoNature-International/message/253

 

 

 

---