Guest guest Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 At 10:39 AM 11/1/07, you wrote: >_ > >Illegal Labeling?MONSANTO TRIES ONCE AGAIN TO FORCE-FEED CONSUMERS rBGH >The good news is that a critical mass of dairies and supermarket chains >are banning Monsanto's Bovine Growth Hormone, bowing to to consumer >pressure. The genetically engineered cow hormone is banned in most >industrialized nations, due to its negative health impacts on cows and >cancer risks to humans, but Monsanto Corporation, the manufacturer of the >drug, is apparently still determined to force-feed rBGH to U.S. consumers. >Under pressure from Monsanto, the notoriously pro-agribusiness >Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) has recently announced new >regulations outlawing the labeling of dairy products as rBGH-free. The >twisted rationale for the ruling is that truthfully labeling dairy >products as rBGH-free is " making it hard for consumers to make informed >decisions. " In other words allowing consumers freedom of choice is bad for >Monsanto's profits, and the profits of Pennsylvania's factory style dairy >feedlots who continue to inject their animals with the drug. PDA listed 16 >companies that will be required to remove rBGH-free labels by December 31, >2007. In the meantime, Monsanto is working to pass similar anti-consumer >laws in other states. The OCA plans to join our allies and stop this >latest episode of biotech bullying. >Learn more: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_7941.cfm > >_ > HOW DID WE GET HERE: >A BRIEF HISTORY OF MONSANTO AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT >1991: Margaret Miller was appointed Deputy Director of FDA by George Bush >Sr. She oversaw the approval of the genetically engineered growth hormone >rBGH. Prior to the appointment, she was one of Monsanto's top scientists >developing rBGH. At the FDA, she approved the same rBGH studies she >previously led at Monsanto. >1991: A right-wing extremist, Clarence Thomas, was appointed to the >Supreme Court, despite nationwide opposition. Prior to his appointment, >Thomas was a lawyer for Monsanto, a notorious chemical polluter and ag >biotech promoter. Thomas would later cast the decisive vote in 2000 on the >Supreme Court, ratifying the stolen election that put George Bush Jr. into >office. >1992: Michael Taylor was appointed FDA's Deputy Commissioner for Policy, a >role created to expedite the approval process of genetically engineered >foods. Prior to his appointment, Taylor was an attorney for Monsanto. >Taylor went on to become Monsanto's Vice-President. >1993: Rufus Yerxa was nominated as U.S. deputy to the World Trade >Organization. Prior to his apointment as one of the most powerful >bureaucrats in the world regarding international trade policies, Rufus was >Monsanto's Chief Counsel. >1996: Michael Kantor was appointed U.S. Secretary of Commerce. At that >time, Kantor was also on the Board of Directors of Monsanto. >2000: The White House appoints Carol Tucker Foreman as the sole " consumer >advocate " on an international committee assessing genetically modified >foods. Prior to her appointment, Foreman was a lobbyist for Monsanto. >2001: Anne Veneman was appointed head of the USDA, in charge of >regulating, among other things, genetically engineered crops. Veneman >previously served on the Board of Directors of Calgene, a Monsanto biotech >subsidiary. >2001: Donald Rumsfeld was sworn in as Secretary or Defense. Rumsfeld was >previously the CEO of the Searle pharmaceutical corporation, acquired by >Monsanto. >2001: Linda Fisher was appointed Deputy Administrator of the U.S. >Environmental Protection Agency. Her regulatory chores included > " enforcing " pesticide regulations, such as Monsanto's herbicide, Roundup, >commonly sprayed on GE crops. Fisher was previously Monsanto's >Vice-President of Government Affairs. Previously Fisher served as a >high-level staffer for another biotech cheerleader, President Bill Clinton. >2002: George Poste was appointed head the bioterrorism division of >Homeland Security. Previously, Poste was a Monsanto animal specialist. >Learn more: http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 At 10:39 AM 11/1/07, you wrote: >The 2007 Farm Bill will continue to spend billions of dollars of taxpayer >money funding " farms " like this.ALERT OF THE WEEK: >SENATE PREPARES TO RUBBER STAMP " BUSINESS AS USUAL " FARM BILL >The Senate Agriculture Committee approved its draft of the $300 billion >2007-2012 Farm Bill last week. The 1300-page bill, now headed to the main >Senate floor, includes, as usual, billions of dollars of taxpayer >subsidies for chemical and energyintensive crops, factory farms, and junk >food purveyors, while " nickle and dime-ing " organic agriculture, >conservation, nutrition, and alternative energy programs. Let your >Senators know you want to eliminate all taxpayer subsidies, other than >those designed to make our food and farming system healthier and more >sustainable, and specifically you want a " Fair Share " for organics >commensurate with our current 3% market share. Besides billions in >corporate subsidies, this version of the Farm Bill includes implementation >of the controversial National Animal Identification System (NAIS). NAIS >would require that all farmers, even those with just one cow, horse, or >chicken, to implant their animals with an electronic tracking device and >permanently report their movements to the USDA. This expensive Big Brother >procedure, which lobbyists crafted so as to exempt factory farms, could >put many small family farms out of business. Please contact your Senators >to cut corporate subsidies, eliminate NAIS, and support increases in >funding in the Farm Bill for for conservation, organic agriculture, >healthy food and beginning farmer programs. >Take Action: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_7765.cfm > >_ >RELATED DUMB QUOTE OF THE WEEK: > >CONGRESS AGRICULTURE CHAIR COLLIN PETERSON: PAYING MORE FOR ORGANIC OR >LOCAL FOOD IS " DUMB " > From an MSNBC.com Financial Times Oct. 17, 2007 > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21349573/ >Collin Peterson, chairman of the House of Representatives agricultural >committee, says the farm sector that raises organic produce and grass-fed >beef for local consumers needs little federal help. " It is growing, and it >has nothing to do with the government, and that is good, " he told the FT. > " For whatever reason, people are willing to pay two or three times as much >for something that says 'organic' or 'local'. Far be it from me to >understand what that's about, but that's reality. And if people are dumb >enough to pay that much then hallelujah. " >To send a message to Collin Peterson (Democrat, MN) congratulating him for >getting the Organic Consumers Association award for the dumbest quote of >the week: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_8104.cfm ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.