RAW Almonds now contain propylene oxide human carcinogen

October 22, 2007

image parody

ALERT UPDATE:RULE REQUIRING PASTEURIZATION OF RAW ALMONDS GOES INTO EFFECT Despite massive opposition from almond producers, retailers and organic consumers, the USDA has implemented its ruling to require that raw almonds be pasteurized. The rule went into effect on September 1st, and since then, all retail outlets have been forced to remove truly raw almonds from store shelves. Consumers will be misled by this action as there will still be almonds on store shelves labeled as "raw", but they will actually be pasteurized. One of the FDA-recommended pasteurization methods requires the use of propylene oxide, which is classified as a "possible human carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and is banned in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. Since the decision about the rule was made, Secretary of Agriculture, Mike Johanns, has stepped down. He is temporarily replaced by Chuck Conner. This may provide a new opportunity for reversal. Please contact Conner today to ask that the rule be suspended for 6 months while the public comment period is re-opened: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_5227.cfm

ALERT: USDA Says Foods Labeled as 'Raw' Can Be Pasteurized

Updated 10/16/2007 (scroll to bottom of page to take action now): Despite a negative backlash from almond producers, retailers and consumers, the USDA has implemented its ruling to require that all raw almonds sold in stores must be pasteurized. The rule went into effect on September 1st, and since then, all retail outlets have been forced to remove true raw almonds from store shelves. Consumers will be misled by this action as there will still be almonds on store shelves labeled as "raw", but they will actually be pasteurized.One of the FDA-recommended pasteurization methods requires the use of propylene oxide, which is classified as a "possible human carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and is banned in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union.Since the decision about the rule was made, Secretary of Agriculture, Mike Johanns, has stepped down. He is temporarily replaced by Chuck Conner. This may provide a new opportunity for reversal.Please contact Conner today to ask that the rule be suspended for 6 months while the public comment period is re-opened.>>Learn More

October 21, 2007 Please

suspend the rule requiring the pasteurization of almonds labeled as

"raw" and re-open the public comment period. I am opposed to the USDA's

new rule requiring the pasteurization of almonds that will continue to

be labeled as "raw". The all but secret public comment period was

apparently intended by the USDA to exclude the public. In fact, only 18

comments were made regarding the rules, and all came from the almond

industry, who were notified of the draft rule when it was open for

public comment in early 2007.

My concerns with the requirement follow:

- One of the FDA-recommended pasteurization methods requires the use of

propylene oxide, which is classified as a "possible human carcinogen"

by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and is banned in

Canada, Mexico, and the European Union.

- The rule favors big-agribusiness over family farmers. Family-scale

almond farmers will struggle with this new rule, since the minimum

price for the pasteurization equipment is $500,000.

- If a product is pasteurized via either a chemical or heat process, it

is no longer raw and should not be labeled as such.

- There have been only two food contamination incidents with raw

almonds since 2001. Each of these was minor and not indicative of a

need to get rid of raw almonds altogether. In fact, both incidences

were the fault of improper management of large-scale farms. The cause

should be addressed here, not the effect.

Please consider re-opening this rule for public commenting and further

consideration.

Thank you. Your signature will be added from the information you provide.

First Name*

Last Name*

Email*

Street 1*

Street 2

City*

State* Select a state Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware D.C. Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Armed Forces (the) Americas Armed Forces Europe Armed Forces Pacific Alberta British Columbia Manitoba Newfoundland New Brunswick Nova Scotia Northwest Territories Nunavut Ontario Prince Edward Island Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon Territory Other

Zip*

Note: The federal government publishes comments made to federal agencies during public comment periods.