WHY-Organic Bee Keepers Not Losing Their Bees

[Guest guest]

At 01:27 PM 5/15/07, you wrote:

>respected, honored, and appreciated. "

>

>Organic Bee Keepers Not Losing Their Bees www.unknnowncountry.com

>14-May-2007

>

>We recently reported on the mystery of bees that are disappearing from

>their hives and being found dead— or not being found at all. Now it turns

>out that organic beekeepers are not having this problem.

>

>The website of the Organic Consumers Association quotes organic beekeeper

>Sharon Labchuk as saying, " I'm on an organic beekeeping list of about

>1,000 people, mostly Americans, and no one in the organic beekeeping

>world, including commercial beekeepers, is reporting colony collapse on

>this list. The problem with the big commercial guys is that they put

>pesticides in their hives to fumigate for varroa mites, and they feed

>antibiotics to the bees. They also haul the hives by truck all over the

>place to make more money with pollination services, which stresses the

>colonies. "

>

>************

>

>this is NOT the answer !! it (the solution) is much more elegant &

>wonderful than this.

>continue below.

>

>*********

>

>

>The Bee's Needs, Part

>One

>http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view & id=335 & Itemi\

d=30

>

>Monday 5/14/07

>The first part of our co-authored piece on the honeybee problem went

>online last night… check it out!

>

>A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT

>This piece came out of a place where science really should originate —

>putting great minds together and coming up with a solution.

>

>It is, of course, an 'open secret' that Hoagland and I do not agree on

>every issue — at times we have to state, in our articles, that there are

>differences of opinion. One key example is he thinks 2012 and

>interplanetary climate change is primarily caused by a body orbiting our

>Solar System at a distance, whereas I attribute it to a spherical galactic

>energy field expanding into the path of our solar system.

>

>Both of us have scientific evidence to support our arguments, and I have

>yet to fully reveal all of mine publicly, though I hope to change that

>soon. You get a great overview of my case — minus some key images that

>close the sale — in the first part of Chapter Eight of Divine Cosmos.

>http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view & id=102 & Itemi\

d=36

>[great pictures]

>

> [on this point i agree w/ both. i think that both phenomena are

> operative]

>

>I'm only now going through this book and fixing all the problems that

>developed from going over to a content-management system in November 2005

>— including 'modern' paragraph spacing optimization — but it's largely

>finished. The others will soon follow — and we will also make it easier to

>find these books than it is right now, buried in " Read Free Books Here "

>and then some uninteresting-looking text posts without graphics.

>

> [these are the books i'm always referencing]

>

>Hoagland also will not cover UFOs, due to a lack of being convinced of

>their origins or intentions, or if they even really exist — and he may or

>may not believe that 2012 has anything specifically to do with soul

>evolution and Ascension. I believe he was interested when I presented this

>in Joshua Tree, but certainly is not convinced. Nor does he specifically

>endorse intuitive written works as being valid and trustworthy, though

>that is a very key aspect of what I do.

>

>Nonetheless, when it comes to the scientific arena, we choose to focus on

>the 85 percent we have in common, regarding this new science, than on the

>15 percent where we disagree. It is nice to work with someone on problems

>like this who is so well-versed in the material that he comes up with

>original ideas I wouldn't have thought of myself. It is also nice to be

>respected for the strength of my scientific work as a stand-alone entity.

>

>I think solving the honeybee problem can smooth our transition in these

>last few years before the 'event' itself, and that's my main concern for

>putting energy into trying to solve the problem. I believe we can engage

>in some combination of taking positive action that can help the planet,

>and also maintaining a state of blissful, uplifting and positive Pure

>Consciousness as much as we are able.

>

>Part One is really just setting the stage for the argument — more of a

>teaser — but it definitely sets the stage for how the current bee problem

>is a function of the 2012 situation. We've also suggested that the

>'insiders' have known about 2012 for a long time and have deliberately

>blocked research that could get people figuring it out.

>Go see for yourself! We're linking to it rather than mirroring it since

>there may be minor changes in the text itself as we go.

>

>The Bees' Needs: It's the Physics, Stupid!

>http://www.enterprisemission.com/Bees/thebeesneeds.htm

>

>[i've copy / pasted w/o the photos. they are worth the trip to the

>website indicated by ,,,,,,,,]

>

>The Bees' Needs:

>

>It's the Physics, Stupid!

>

>By Richard C. Hoagland and David Wilcock

>

>© 2007 The Enterprise Mission

>

>INTRODUCTION: NEW SCIENCE REVEALS THE SOLUTION

>

>The epic, unprecedented, literal disappearance of the world's honeybee

>population -- termed officially " Colony Collapse Disorder " (CCD), that

>suddenly began to be reported only last November -- is extraordinarily

>serious. However, contrary to some of the most severe of these mainstream

>reports, it does not have to spell " the end of life as we know it on Earth. "

>,,,,,,,,

>

>There is an elegant, inexpensive solution to the crisis -- almost absurdly

>simple at the face of it -- for both identifying, and then fixing, the

>underlying problem. Mainstream scientists cannot explain why this method

>would work, in fact, by their own admission they still don't even know the

>source of CCD ... let alone, that a ready solution also currently exists.

>Therefore, most would automatically assume our proposal to be either a

>fluke, or outright fantasy.

>

>It is neither.

>

>The answers to the crucial questions now being asked by increasingly

>desperate beekeepers, baffled scientists and millions of concerned

> " ordinary folks, " as " X-Files-type reports " of the literal, escalating,

>world-wide disappearance of billions of domestic honeybees continue to

>pour in, is to be found in a long-suppressed " new " branch of science --

>which both authors of this Report have been researching and developing ...

>if not openly discussing ... for many years.

>

>Our civilization has developed marvelous gadgets, giving us instantaneous,

>worldwide data and audio-visual communcation. The signals travel through

> " empty space " on invisible electromagnetic waves -- for which, the

>existence of civilization (if not our own existence!) now depends. Nature

>and the biology of the " natural world " is no different -- but instead of

>electromagnetic waves, it uses (in part) something called " torsion fields "

>for the same essential purpose -- to transmit vital signals into and

>between living eco-systems, so that they may function properly.

>

>Globally, literally thousands of " peer reviewed " scientific papers on

>these " torsion fields " have been written in the last half century or so,

>yet wide-spread scientific knowledge of this critical, fundamental aspect

>of physics and biology has been almost completely excluded from the world

>of academic scientists and mainstream research institutions -- to say

>nothing of the popular scientific press -- in the so-called " Western

>world. " There is a crucial, calculated reason for this ignorance, which we

>shall get to.

>

>However, as we shall demonstate in this Report, Nature doesn't care

>whether Western science has heard about (or " peer reviewed " ...) these

>fields or not -- it just uses them, to overwhelmingly significant effect.

>

>Later in this work, the authors will also prove -- including, with

>reference to results from their own " torsion field experiments " --

>precisely how this " Hyperdimensional Physics " can now be used to truly

>answer ... and then solve ... the greatest short-term environmental crisis

>of our time--

>

> " What's happening to the domestic bees!? "

>

>

>TORSION FIELDS [see following e-mail]

>

>Though, as we said, there are currently more than ten thousand scientific

>papers published world-wide on " torsion fields " -- over half of them from

>Russia and other former Soviet Republics alone -- the latter were kept

>classified for reasons of " national security " by the KGB, until the fall

>of the Iron Curtain in 1991.

>

>All that has now changed; thanks to the rise of the World Wide Web in the

>late 1990s, and the earlier collapse of the Soviet Union, everything we

>need to know about this formerly, completely " hidden science " is, at least

>partially, available on the Net -- especially, the amazing pioneering work

>of Russian astronomer, Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev ... rightly called by many " the

>father of torsion physics. "

>,,,,,,,,,,,

>

>These brilliant " new " sciences not only have the power to actually solve

>the honeybee " disappearance epidemic, " they can also reduce -- or even

>eliminate -- the most severe effects of another major looming

>environmental crisis: " global warming. "

>

>They can do this, first and foremost, by opening the door to truly

>non-polluting, virtually unlimited sources of new energy; by thus

>drastically reducing the atmospheric " greenhouse gas " emissions associated

>with burning fossil fuels. In addition, the widespread development of

>these " torsion physics energy alternatives " would also have enormous,

>positive geopolitical side-effects -- in terms of the continuing crisis of

> " the war on terror, " stemming directly from our overwhelming, continuing

>dependence on oil from the Middle East.

>

>This fundamental physics can even -- again, according to existing Russian

>laboratory experiments and technological prototypes -- provide a totally

>new means of " getting off the Earth " ; a stunning " inertia drive "

>alternative to the still incredibly " primitive " rocket technology which

>keeps spaceflight so expensive (and, limited to a virtual " handful " of

> " super-professional " astronauts and cosmonauts).

>

>This " limited space access problem " -- which would be solved " in a stroke "

>by the demonstration of a viable alternative " space drive technology, "

>based on torsion physics -- is repeately brought home by the endless

>technical and political soap opera associated with NASA's beleagured

>shuttle program, if not its dwindling prospects of someday " returning to

>the Moon. "

>

>It is urgent, then, that we swiftly close this fundamental " physics gap, "

>fill in the missing pieces ... and use this suppressed, often bizarre

> " new " science in a variety of applications to literally save our planet!

>

>Because -- based on innumerable " insider " testimonies, including private

>contacts of both authors of this paper -- notwithstanding the " astonishing

>ignorance " of Western mainstream science to these remarkable discoveries,

>these " exotic " breakthroughs and associated technologies are well-known

>(and routinely used!) within existing, top-secret " black-budget

>operations " (Black Ops), or (the other inside term ...) " unacknowledged

>special-access programs " (USAPS) of the US military-industrial-government

>complex.

>

>The simple fact that " torsion physics " -- and its extraordinary

>capabilities and implications -- is not widely recognized in the West as

> " the vital, missing element to current textbook physics, " is by the

>deliberate design of these same " black ops " agencies--

>

>Who demonstrably want the almost limitless power provided by this radical

> " new " science ... for themselves.

>

>

>THE POWER TO SAVE THE PLANET

>

>This is why, whether or not UFOs are really " alien spacecraft, " or could

>simply be strriking examples of these " advanced torsion-based

>technologies " developed right here on Earth by these same hidden Black-Ops

>programs, former Canadian Defense Minister, Paul Hellyer's, recently

>demand -- that world governments finally, literally for the sake of all

>Humanity -- come clean with the truth, is so important.

>

>In an interview with a leading Canadian newspaper last February, the

> " Ottawa Citizen, " Hellyer -- certainly, a man who ought to know! -- was

>widely quoted on precisely this delicate subject of " secret science and

>technologies " :

>

>

> OTTAWA (AFP) - A former Canadian defense minister is demanding

> governments worldwide disclose and use secret alien technologies obtained

> in alleged UFO crashes to stem climate change, a local paper said Wednesday.

>

> " I would like to see what [alien] technology there might be that

> could eliminate the burning of fossil fuels within a generation ... that

> could be a way to save our planet, " Paul Hellyer, 83, told the Ottawa

> Citizen...

>

> " We need to persuade governments to come clean on what they know.

> Some of us suspect they know quite a lot, and it might be enough to save

> our planet if applied quickly enough, " he said. [emphasis added]

>,,,,,,,,,,,,,

>

>It is likely that Hellyer knows far more than even he feels safe in saying

>at the moment, given his former official government position --

>particularly, because everyone on the " inside " has to sign strict

>non-disclosure agreements that promise, among other things, even

>potentially lethal repercussions, if those signing them break their legal

> " vow of silence. "

>

>In the next installment of this Report, we will show specifically how

>these same " secret " sciences already provide the solution to Colony

>Collapse Disorder; it doesn't matter whether our governments tell us the

>truth or not -- all we have to do is change a few simple beekeeping

>practices, and the ability to dramatically turn around CCD will soon

>follow. In addition, we can also now explain why it works... for the first

>time in human history.

>

>Therefore, the real, immediate problem is simply getting enough publicity

>to make this new science part of our " common civilian knowledge " in the

>Western world. You can help by sharing this article series with as many

>others as possible, and as soon as possible ....

>

>

>SCIENTIFIC SUPPRESSION

>

> From released KGB files, we already know the former Soviet government was

> " guilty as charged " with suppressing a huge body of scientific research

> into " torsion fields. " They sealed it all away in their own " black-ops "

> world, literally as a " state secret. "

>

>If you don't think Western governments would do the same thing --

>suppressing information from their own people, such as " the science of

>torsion fields " for their own " national security " -- think again. A brief

>history lesson -- from our very recent past -- is in order.

>

>On Monday, April 2, 2007, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that " global

>warming " is real -- proof positive that the political " tipping point " has

>now been reached on this critical issue.

>

>This breakthrough could have happened much earlier. After years of

>fighting even the idea of " global climate change " on a variety of fronts,

>the Bush Administration finally lost -- an on-going fight partially

>visible in at least 294 acts of documented, outright censorship of various

>scientific government reports ... on the " signficance " of global climate

>change.

>

>According to the New Scientist:

>

>

> US fudging of climate science - details revealed

> 12:30 20 March 2007

> NewScientist.com news service

> Kelly Young

>

> The Bush administration has again been charged with interfering

> with federal climate science, in order to underplay the significance of

> global warming.

>

> In a continuing investigation, the US House Committee on

> Oversight and Government Reform held its second hearing on the issue on

> Monday. Documents " appear to portray a systematic White House effort to

> minimise the significance of climate change " , said a memo released by the

> committee.

>

> The committee heard from James Hansen, the director of the NASA

> Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, and one of the first

> scientists to warn of the threat of climate change.

>

> In written testimony, Hansen said: " In my more than three decades

> in government, I have never seen anything approaching the degree to which

> information flow from scientists to the public has been screened and

> controlled as it has now. " ...

>

> In a 10-year policy plan, Cooney and Brian Hannegan, also at CEQ,

> made at least 181 edits to emphasise scientific uncertainty regarding the

> effects of climate change, and 113 changes to minimise the importance of

> human contributions to global warming, according to the committee's memo.

>

> For example, Cooney replaced " will " with " may " in the sentence:

> " Warming temperatures will also affect Arctic land areas. " He also

> deleted this sentence: " Climate change has global consequences for human

> health and the environment " [emphasis added].

>

>

>During the hearings, Dr. Hansen also asked why his testimony -- as a

>government scientist -- had to be reviewed, edited and changed by a

>bureaucrat in the White House:

>

>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

>

> Quote: Scientist Accuses White House of " Nazi " Tactics

> By Joel Havemann

> The Los Angeles Times

> Monday 19 March 2007

>

> Washington - A government scientist, under sharp questioning by a

> federal panel for his outspoken views on global warming, stood by his

> view today that the Bush administration's information policies smacked of

> Nazi Germany.

>

> James Hansen... took particular issue with the administration's

> rule that a government information officer listen in on his interviews

> with reporters -- and its refusal to allow him to be interviewed by

> National Public Radio...

>

> Hansen said the Bush administration was not the first in U.S.

> history to practice information management over government scientists,

> but it has been the most vigorous. He deplored a " politicization of science. "

>

> " When I testify to you as a government scientist, " he said, " why

> does my testimony have to be reviewed, edited and changed by a bureaucrat

> in the White House? " Sitting beside him was one of the bureaucrats Hansen

> was talking about: Philip Cooney, chief of staff to the White House

> Council on Environmental Quality from 2001 to 2005 [emphasis added].

>

>

>Why would they care?

>

>In order to answer that question, you have to visualize the Grand

>Chessboard that polticians (and others ...) are constantly manipulating

>these days. Psychologically, the open admission of " global warming "

>reduces the mass public's confidence in government's ability to " protect

>them from harm. " A weak government is easily replaced by another that can

>(or might ...) propose greater protection.

>

>It's even worse if the " protection " itself would further weaken the

>government ... by directly attacking its most affluent supporters -- which

>certainly appears to be the case here. Just as surely as day turns into

>night, a climate change media break would create sweeping new political

>pressures for " emissions standards for the oil companies " ... and even an

>expedited shift " totally off fossil fuels themselves, " which, surprise,

>surprise, are the very corporate energy producers heavily interlinked with

>the current Administration.

>

>Think " Halliburton. "

>

>So, as history has repeatedly proven with events such as the Watergate

>Scandal, where there's smoke there's fire -- and by the time you see a few

>wisps leaking out in the mainstream media, there is often " a blazing pot

>of gold hiding in the clouds, there at the end of the rainbow ... " --

>mixing our metaphors madly.

>

>We believe we have found the gold -- far more than we could ever hope to

>spend ourselves. Unless we share it with you, it's really worth nothing to us.

>

>The " secret treasure " can be found, beginning with Hoagland's epic tome

>describing the origins and evolution of his quarter-century-long search

>into the literally " off planet " foundations of this radical " new

>science " :The Monuments of Mars. This was followed, some years later, by a

>set of formal addresses to the United Nations -- the UN Briefing DVD. And,

>then there's the groundbreaking and freely-available " Hyperdimensional

>Physics 101, " which explains the basic Hyperdimensional science underlying

> " torsion physics, " here at Enterprise itself.

>

>Furthermore, in " Hyperdimensional Nebulae: Cubes in Space and the 2012

>Case, " Wilcock demonstrates the same hidden geometry at work in the

>protein synthesis of all living things -- which can also be seen in

>quantum physics, planets, nebulae and even galactic superclusters. No

>other model has ever presented such a Unified view of all branches of

>science, as what we are now assembling ....

>,,,,,,,,,,,

>

>

>Some of this new data will be expanded in later sections of this Report --

>as well as surprising new facts presented, revealing how honeybees are

>attuned to the same " torsion fields " underlying all matter, energy and

>life in three dimensions ... as we currently know it.

>

>

>SOLAR SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

>

>Were it not for the sudden threat of Colony Collapse Disorder, we were set

>to publish the newest installment in our on-going " Interplanetary Day

>After Tomorrow? " article series (started back in 2004), within the next

>few days. In Parts 2 and 3 of 'Interplanetary', we cited at that time well

>over 100 different mainstream NASA studies that collectively revealed our

>entire Solar System is undergoing massive " climate change " ... just like

>we are now seeing on Earth.

>

>If you think the " local " honeybee problem may be related to this more

>far-reaching " interplanetary effect, " then you're on exactly the right

>track -- and you're probably a regular listener to " Coast-to-Coast AM "

>with George Noory and Art Bell to boot!

>

>There have been increasingly serious-sounding reports of " Global Warming "

>on Mars recently, and some astronomers have suggested other solar system

>planets are also changing as well, using small, isolated studies of the

>data. Even though we published our Interplanetary paper three years ago --

>again, with over 100 different data sources -- it seems to have gone

>unnoticed by almost everyone ... both in the mainstream and alternative

>communities.

>

>We gave official (NASA) climate change data for every planet (except

>Mercury), and many outer solar system satellites (moons) -- showing

>dramatic increases in brightness; magnetic field strength; ozone content

>in the atmosphere; global storms; X-ray activity; and, of course, " good

>'ol global warming " -- all across the board. We also pointed out that the

>Sun is simultaneously experiencing an 11,000-year high in its level of

>activity (anticipating, again, by three years the latest official warnings

>that " Solar Cycle 24 " will be a " lulu! " ).

>

>It was a great deal of work to put all that data together, but

>realistically anyone could have done it -- as it was all from mainstream

>sources.

>

>Now we know NASA, and the US government, has been actively suppressing

>objective climate change data here on Earth for years. What about

>interplanetary climate change: is there any credible evidence that this

> " big picture " has also been selectively censored ... and, also from the

>top levels of the US government (and others ...)?

>

>Absolutely.

>

>

>NASA BLOCKS EVIDENCE OF ENERGETIC CHANGES

>

>As we have demonstrated going back three years -- and with official NASA

>data -- the physics of our entire solar system is changing, and on the

>most fundamental levels: planetary temperatures (irrespective of distance

>from the sun); global magnetic field strengths; even planetary rotation

>periods ....

>

>The vast volume of the Galaxy immediately outside our system of orbiting

>planetary objects -- and just outside the influence of the magnetic field

>of the sun -- is called the Local Interstellar Medium ... or " LISM. " If

>the solar system is changing as much as we've reported from intrinsic HD

>and torsion effects, we would expect to see an energetic increase in the

>far more distant LISM as well. A " feedback effect " from the LISM would

>then be expected on the various " heliosphere " parameters within the sun's

>magnetic influence, that our most distant spacecraft (the two Pioneers and

>two Voyagers) are now actively sampling, as they forever leave the solar

>system -- measurable by such things as " the quantity and density of

>charged particles " they are finding and reporting back by radio from their

>extraordinarily remote locations now.

>

>And, if you were a government (or, others ...) who did not want even this

>type of " unsettling, changing solar system information " to reach " ordinary

>folks, " just to be really safe, you'd probably keep all your bases covered

>on this esoteric front as well.

>

>And, it looks like " someone " has ....

>

>As Wilcock reported in 2002, NASA scientist Dr. Don Shemansky found the

>initial " happiness and wonder of scientific discovery " meeting up with a

>cold, dark, " insidious force " -- the same scientific suppression that led

>to those recent (at least ...) 294 acts of documented censorship by the US

>government, against NASA's Dr. Hansen.

>

>Dr. Shemansky, after many years of quiet " suffering, " publicly denounced

>NASA's " persistent, pernicious bias " against ANY research suggesting there

>is " a charge-up in the LISM. " Don't forget that " pernicious " means

> " deadly, evil and insidious " -- so this is quite an accusation, coming

>from a physicist! Archive.org (the " Way Back Machine " ) shows Shemansky's

>page, carrying this remarkable public indictment of NASA, was first

>recorded on " February 17th, 2001 " :

>

>

> " ... research on the properties of the Local Interstellar medium

> have been carried out in scattered periods beginning in 1978. The NASA

> Space Physics Division has shown a persistent pernicious bias against

> work on the effects of the neutral gas in the LISM in the United States,

> from the time of the formation of the Division…

>

> " The most important contributions to research in this Program are

> papers ... which present the first evidence for a large increase in the

> LISM neutral atomic hydrogen density… [emphasis added]. "

>,,,,,,,,,,

>

>So, NASA doesn't want Shemansky to share even his extremely esoteric

> " interstellar research " -- which could ultimately suggest even the vast

>volume of space surrounding the entire solar system is, somehow,

>undergoing " a fundamental change in physics. " And, this " pernicious NASA

>bias " on this subject could extend all the way back to 1978, as Shemansky

>himself indicates.

>

>Someone, even then, really didn't want this getting out ... did they?!

>

>But, does the buck stop with NASA?

>

>No.

>

>Dr. James Hansen's recent testimony reveals that this " pernicious bias "

>comes from far higher ... directly from the highest levels of the US

>government itself -- not only the White House -- but, whomever is actually

>running things .....

>

>

>GETTING DOWN TO BEESNESS...

>

>As we head into Part Two, we will have an in-depth investigation of Colony

>Collapse Disorder -- and present compelling evidence that it is a by

>product of the same change in physics that is now affecting the entire

>solar system (if not a sizable chunk of the local Galaxy beyond ...).

>

>If the background flux patterns of " torsion fields " are fundamentally

>changing, the domesticated bees may have lost their equally fundamental

>torsion navigation systems. This could also easily explain the sudden

>appearance of massive swarms in places where they've never been seen --

>like, the ~60,000 honey bees which suddenly showed up in downtown Spokane,

>Washington the other day (literally, at City Hall!); and the equally

>confused colony which tried to take over a home in Florida of a family

>member of one of the authors, just a couple months before.

>

>These and many other such incidents, ocurring all across the country now,

>are indicative of, apparently, sizeable numbers of not " dead bees " ... but

> " lost bees. "

>,,,,,,,,,

>

>Recognizing the recent erroneous reports from Germany -- that " cell

>phones " could account for the mysterious world-wide disappearances (NOT!)

>-- electromagnetic radiation does have a scrambling or " decohering " effect

>on torsion fields in certain circumstances, as many of those Russian

>studies have shown. But powerful radio stations, super high-power military

>radars and, yes, even cell phones, have all been with us (and the bees

>...) year after year, literally for decades ... and we've never seen a

>problem like CCD before.

>

>The answer for the bees, as you will see, all comes back to letting Nature

>do what it does best ... once we figure out what Nature's really trying to

>say.

>

>Stay tuned...

>

>-0-

>

>Part II Currently in Preparation ....

>

>[what these people are in the process of showing us is ultimately:

> 1. THE SCIENCE OF CREATION. &

> 2. THERE IS ONLY CONSCIOUSNESS ]

> " VIBRATION is the KEY "

> Pace e Bene & Bella Luce John

 

******

Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky

http://www.thehavens.com/

thehavens

606-376-3363

 

 

---

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05