Guest guest Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 At 01:25 PM 4/20/07, you wrote: >Scientific American, Apr. 17, 2007 >[Printer-friendly version] > >BRINGING CANCER TO THE DINNER TABLE > >Breast Cancer Cells Grow Under Influence of Fish Flesh > >By David Biello > >Many streams, rivers and lakes already bear warning signs that the >fish caught within them may contain dangerously high levels of >mercury, which can cause brain damage. But, according to a new study, >these fish may also be carrying enough chemicals that mimic the female >hormone estrogen to cause breast cancer cells to grow. > > " Fish are really a sentinel, just like canaries in the coal mine 100 >years ago, " says Conrad Volz, co-director of exposure assessment at >the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute's Center for >Environmental Ecology. " We need to pay attention to chemicals that are >estrogenic in nature, because they find their way back into the water >we all use. " > >Volz and colleagues, including biochemist Patricia Eagon, took samples >from 21 catfish and six white bass donated by local anglers as part of >a study presented at the American Association for Cancer Research >meeting in Los Angeles this week. The fish were caught in five places: >a relatively unpolluted site 36 miles upstream from Pittsburgh on the >Allegheny River; an industrial site on the Monongahela River; an >Allegheny site downstream from several industries that release toxic >chemicals; and the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers, >where Pittsburgh dumps much of its treated sewage and sewer outflows. > " This is the largest concentration of combined sewer outflows in the >U.S., " Volz notes, about the confluence, known as the Point. The >researchers also bought several fish at the store as controls. > >Using an organic solvent, the researchers created an extract from the >skin, flesh and fat of the various fish. They then bathed a breast >cancer cell line -- known as MCF-7 -- in the extract. " We used this cell >line because it has estrogen receptors in it, meaning that if >estrogens are present it causes this cell line to proliferate, " Volz >explains. " If you put something on it and it grows, then it must be >stimulating the estrogen receptor. " In addition to responding to pure >estrogen applied as a positive control, the extract from two of the >white bass and five of the catfish caused the breast cancer cells to >thrive. > >The highest response came from fish caught in the industrial section >of the Monongahela River. " The Monongahela River area is the area in >Pittsburgh that was the site of most of the steel production over the >last 100 years, " Volz says. " That area is still an industrial >beehive. " But the broadest response came from where the sewer outflows >and sewage treatment plants flow into the rivers from Pittsburgh; >three of the four catfish caught here caused the breast cancer cells >to proliferate. " Sewage might be more responsible for putting >estrogenic chemicals in the water than the industries alone, " Volz >adds. " All of the hormone replacement products that women use go down >the drain, along with birth control pills, antibacterial soaps, and >many of the plastics we use, like Bisphenol A, have such effects. " > >It remains unclear exactly what estrogen-mimicking chemicals were >actually present in the fish and what kind of cancer-causing role they >might have. But their effects on the fish themselves were clear: the >gender of nine of the fish could not be determined. " Increased >estrogenic active substances in the water are changing males so that >they are indistinguishable from females, " Volz says. " There are eggs >in male gonads as well as males are secreting a yolk sac protein. >Males aren't supposed to be making egg stuff. " > >And this estrogen burden is widespread. The store-bought white bass >caused breast cancer cells to grow like its river-caught counterparts >(as well as containing higher levels of mercury, arsenic and other >contaminants) after being trucked to Pittsburgh from Lake Erie. " These >fish, again, were in waters that were seeing industrial waste as well >as possible combined sewer outflows, " Volz notes. " This isn't just >happening in Pittsburgh, this is happening everywhere in the >industrialized world. " > >Volz says he and his fellow researchers are launching a broader survey >this summer that will entail sampling fish all along the Allegheny >River. Efforts will be made to determine if it is industrial waste, >sewage or agricultural runoff -- or all three -- that is responsible for the >problem. In the meantime, cooking the fat out of fish may be the best >defense. " If you broil fish and let the fats drip out that will take >most of the contaminants out, " Volz says, though that may not be >enough given other exposures to potentially tainted water. " What our >study does show us is that there is exposure potential to vast >populations that use water from our rivers as their drinking water >supply. " > >Copyright 1996-2007 Scientific American, Inc. ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.