Guest guest Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Yes, you should ! What if a diagnostic test actually triggers the life-threatening disease it is supposed to detect? According to a Johns Hopkins study just published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, that may be exactly what happens when women at risk for genetic breast cancer are subjected to radiation exposure from annual mammograms. According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), about 13.2 percent of women in the general U.S. population will develop breast cancer. But scientists have found that many women (especially those with a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancers) have altered genes, identified as BRCA1 or BRCA2, which raise the risk of breast malignancies to around 85 percent. It’s important to note that women are not routinely screened for an altered BRCA gene and the test costs several thousands of dollars. So, bottom line, many women unknowingly carry this genetic risk for cancer. ==================================================== In addition, Samuel S. Epstein M.D., Professor Emeritus of Environmental Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, and his colleagues conducted a review of 47 scientific articles about mammography. Their article, “Dangers and Unreliability of Mammography: Breast Examination is a Safe, Effective, and Practical Alternativeâ€, published in the International Journal of Health Services (2001;31(3):605-15) concluded that mammogram screening carries many dangers, including induction and promotion of breast cancer, falsely positive and negative diagnosis of breast cancer, and over-diagnosis. ============================================================ Mammograms Don’t Help, They Harm Women Breast cancer kills women. In fact, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Lung cancer is number one. It is estimated that 211,240 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005. 40,410 have since died from the disease. These deaths should not have occurred. There is a potentially fatal flaw in our medical profession’s diagnostic procedure. Could mammograms cause cancer? The standard method for early cancer detection is mammography. A mammogram is a procedure during which an X-ray picture of the breast is taken that can reveal tumor growths that may be otherwise undetectable. Like all x-rays, mammograms utilize doses of ionizing radiation to create this image. The image is then analyzed for any abnormal growths. Mammography is now receiving sizable opposition because of high error rates and high radiation levels involved in the procedure. The rate of false positives and false negatives is alarming. 70 to 80 percent of all positive mammograms do not show any presence of cancer upon biopsy. Additionally, mammograms have a high rate of missed tumors (false negatives). In the book The Politics of Cancer, Dr. Samuel S. Epstein claims that in women ages 40 to 49, 25% have their cancer missed by mammography. Many women depend on an annual mammogram to diagnose breast cancer. Recent studies show, however, that an annual mammogram may actually increase your risk of developing breast cancer from 1 to 3 percent. This is because the breast is one of the parts of the body most sensitive to radiation exposure. It is second only to fetal tissue. In addition, by the age of 50 approximately 45 percent of women will have cancer cells present in their breasts. These cells remain dormant in most women. However, if you are in this group of women, you are at an increased risk of these cells becoming active. Research has uncovered a gene, called oncogene AC that is highly sensitive to even small doses of radiation. A significant percentage of women have this gene and this could increase their risk of mammography-induced cancer. Since mammograms were introduced, the occurrence of a form of breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased by over 300 percent. Two hundred percent of this increase is thought to be due to mammography. Mammography may also contribute to the spread of existing cancer cells due to the enormous pressure placed on the woman’s breast during the procedure. According to some physicians, this compression may even cause existing cancer cells to metastasize from the affected breast tissue. Russell L. Blaylock, MD, estimates that annual radiological breast exams increase the risk of breast cancer by two percent a year. =========================== You can have a thermography and it is very safe and accurate : here an article on early cancer detection and thermography. Using an infrared thermography camera makes many thousands of detailed measures of the patient’s skin temperature from a distance of 5-8 feet. The produced images are viewed as an image in a spectrum of colors that are indicative of abnormal levels of heat being given out by the surface of the bod http://www.jmbblog.com/early-cancer-detection-tests-part-2-thermography-and-more\ / ========================================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Thanks so much for this great info...blessings to you. Marilyn --- On Wed, 5/13/09, shaman urban <shaman_urban wrote: shaman urban <shaman_urban Should You Get a Mammogram? Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 1:25 PM Yes, you should ! What if a diagnostic test actually triggers the life-threatening disease it is supposed to detect? According to a Johns Hopkins study just published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, that may be exactly what happens when women at risk for genetic breast cancer are subjected to radiation exposure from annual mammograms. According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), about 13.2 percent of women in the general U.S. population will develop breast cancer. But scientists have found that many women (especially those with a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancers) have altered genes, identified as BRCA1 or BRCA2, which raise the risk of breast malignancies to around 85 percent. It’s important to note that women are not routinely screened for an altered BRCA gene and the test costs several thousands of dollars. So, bottom line, many women unknowingly carry this genetic risk for cancer. ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ==== In addition, Samuel S. Epstein M.D., Professor Emeritus of Environmental Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, and his colleagues conducted a review of 47 scientific articles about mammography. Their article, “Dangers and Unreliability of Mammography: Breast Examination is a Safe, Effective, and Practical Alternativeâ€, published in the International Journal of Health Services (2001;31(3): 605-15) concluded that mammogram screening carries many dangers, including induction and promotion of breast cancer, falsely positive and negative diagnosis of breast cancer, and over-diagnosis. ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= === Mammograms Don’t Help, They Harm Women Breast cancer kills women. In fact, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Lung cancer is number one. It is estimated that 211,240 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005. 40,410 have since died from the disease. These deaths should not have occurred. There is a potentially fatal flaw in our medical profession’s diagnostic procedure. Could mammograms cause cancer? The standard method for early cancer detection is mammography. A mammogram is a procedure during which an X-ray picture of the breast is taken that can reveal tumor growths that may be otherwise undetectable. Like all x-rays, mammograms utilize doses of ionizing radiation to create this image. The image is then analyzed for any abnormal growths. Mammography is now receiving sizable opposition because of high error rates and high radiation levels involved in the procedure. The rate of false positives and false negatives is alarming. 70 to 80 percent of all positive mammograms do not show any presence of cancer upon biopsy. Additionally, mammograms have a high rate of missed tumors (false negatives). In the book The Politics of Cancer, Dr. Samuel S. Epstein claims that in women ages 40 to 49, 25% have their cancer missed by mammography. Many women depend on an annual mammogram to diagnose breast cancer. Recent studies show, however, that an annual mammogram may actually increase your risk of developing breast cancer from 1 to 3 percent. This is because the breast is one of the parts of the body most sensitive to radiation exposure. It is second only to fetal tissue. In addition, by the age of 50 approximately 45 percent of women will have cancer cells present in their breasts. These cells remain dormant in most women. However, if you are in this group of women, you are at an increased risk of these cells becoming active. Research has uncovered a gene, called oncogene AC that is highly sensitive to even small doses of radiation. A significant percentage of women have this gene and this could increase their risk of mammography- induced cancer. Since mammograms were introduced, the occurrence of a form of breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased by over 300 percent. Two hundred percent of this increase is thought to be due to mammography. Mammography may also contribute to the spread of existing cancer cells due to the enormous pressure placed on the woman’s breast during the procedure. According to some physicians, this compression may even cause existing cancer cells to metastasize from the affected breast tissue. Russell L. Blaylock, MD, estimates that annual radiological breast exams increase the risk of breast cancer by two percent a year. ============ ========= ====== You can have a thermography and it is very safe and accurate : here an article on early cancer detection and thermography. Using an infrared thermography camera makes many thousands of detailed measures of the patient’s skin temperature from a distance of 5-8 feet. The produced images are viewed as an image in a spectrum of colors that are indicative of abnormal levels of heat being given out by the surface of the bod http://www.jmbblog. com/early- cancer-detection -tests-part- 2-thermography- and-more/ ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= = Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 That is sooo " not the norm " (pressure from the mamogram bursting the cyst)....and by the time 'you' detect a lump, a mamogram could have detected it before anyone could feel it... Like I said in an eaflier post; I got my first mamogram at 53 (shame on me!)...I was so scared when I went in and lo and behold!; the pressure is minimal, the entire 'ordeal' lasts maybe 10 -15 minutes depending on how many pictures are being taken. I've been an advocate of homeopathy and natural medicine/ complimentary medicine for over 30 years....and I would strongly advice getting a mamogram. For your own health; at least get a base line! Max --- On Wed, 5/13/09, Lyndall Abbott-Young <devil.tas wrote: Lyndall Abbott-Young <devil.tas Re: Should You Get a Mammogram? Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 1:47 PM I personally have stopped having mammograms because I do feel very strongly that they can and do cause more harm than good! I prefer to do self examinations and get my GP to check me out on a regular exam basis. I know of one lady who unknown to her at the time had a cyst in one breast and had a mammogram done and ended up having major problems because the pressure of the mammogram on the breast burst the cyst. NOT for me thanks! cheers Lyndall ~~~~~~~~~~ I do self examinations regularly and my GP does an annual breast manipulation and has found nothing of alarm. Am I being paranoid about radiation and are my fears of creating other issues (possibly caused by radiation) legitimate and/or well-founded? Susan S., Canada *** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 , marilyn brent <usasinnersaved wrote: > > Thanks so much for this great info...blessings to you. Marilyn > I hopes that you understood Yes you should NOT. My bad, but reading the post i am sure you understood my mistake!! Good Bless ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.