Vaccine safety data deliberately suppressed, new report reveals.

[Guest guest]

Note: This is a copyright-free transmission. Please e-mail this on to

anyone you believe would appreciate receiving it.

 

 

WHEN A GOVERNMENT LIES:

What every parent and grandparent needs to know about vaccinations

(and why health officials always quote safety records from Canada)

 

 

Fewer children are having the MMR jab than at any time in the past decade.

It’s a trend that is worrying health officials in the UK, who are blaming

parents’ reticence on scare stories about the vaccine, such as the possible link

with autism.

But What Doctors Don’t Tell You (WDDTY), the health journal for consumers,

recognizes a deeper – and more disturbing – reason. Parents have lost faith

with their health officials, and no longer believe that they are being told the

truth about the safety record of vaccines.

Research by WDDTY has discovered parents have every justification for their

suspicions: in fact, health officials are playing fast and loose with the truth

in order to get immunisation numbers up.

WDDTY research has discovered that:

 

officials are deliberately suppressing data about the safety of vaccines

they are under-playing the side effects, which range far beyond autism

they are over-stressing the prevalence and seriousness of some diseases in

order to scare parents into immunisation

they know new vaccines they’re introducing to the UK have killed children in

the USA – something they’ve never told parents.

 

It’s a scandal that health officials are prepared to play with the health and

well-being of other people’s children – just to keep up vaccination levels.

 

Governments lie when they tell us vaccines are safe

 

The UK government has introduced a bold vaccination programme for the nation’s

toddlers, and doctors are being incentivized with bigger cash bonuses to get

more than 90 per cent of the children on their books vaccinated. Under the new

programme, a child will have been given 21 separate vaccines by the time he or

she reaches the age of 24 months.

This schedule includes the MMR jab, plus three new vaccines – a ‘5-in-1’ jab,

and new pneumococcal and meningitis C vaccines.

The 5-in-1, introduced 18 months ago, is designed to protect against

diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, Hib and polio. It replaces the old 3-in-1

DPT jab, and the Department of Health insists it’s far safer. Unfortunately,

the safety records supplied by the vaccine’s manufacturer don’t support the

claim. In one study, two-thirds of the 451 infants vaccinated experienced a

side effect, which included some severe reactions. These included febrile

convulsions, hyporesponsive episodes, where the child loses consciousness, and

high-pitched and inconsolable crying, an early warning of encephalitis, or

inflammation of the brain.

Other reactions included dyspnoea, or breathing difficulties, cyanosis, which

is the discolouring of the skin due to lack of oxygen, hives, oedema,

hypotension and anaphylaxis.

 

 

Why governments quote Canadian safety records

At the age of just three months, a baby should receive its first vaccine

against meningitis C. Again, health officials reassure parents that the vaccine

is safe – but, again, WDDTY researchers have discovered this is a blatant lie.

In one study, 92 per cent of vaccinated children suffered a systemic reaction

of moderate to severe intensity within the first seven days of being inoculated.

And yet the manufacturer has gone on record with WDDTY to state that “there are

no safety concerns” with the vaccine.

Amazingly, the new vaccine has never been through safety checks. Instead the

UK officials relied on data on a similar vaccine being used in Canada – but it’s

not the same, as the manufacturer has confirmed with WDDTY.

It’s also more than mere coincidence that UK officials have looked to Canada

for its safety check. In Canada there is no compulsory requirement to report a

reaction to a vaccine, unlike in the USA where every possible or likely reaction

must be reported to the drug monitoring authority, the FDA.

It’s left to the manufacturer to voluntarily report an adverse reaction to its

vaccine – and according to research by WDDTY, this is a loop-hole that’s well

used. Manufacturers can also use a ‘time window’ – a period of time when it

might reasonably be expected to see a reaction. Any reaction that falls outside

that window again can be immediately ignored.

So, when health officials say a vaccine is safe “because of research in

Canada”, you know the deck is stacked, and you should treat it with extreme

caution.

 

So can we trust our health officials to tell us the truth about vaccinations?

From what we’ve discovered, we don’t think so. It’s therefore up to every

parent and grandparent to take on the responsibility, and become his or her own

medical detective.

 

A ‘safe’ vaccine that has killed 117 children

This month we’ve seen the introduction of the latest vaccine to this intensive

programme – the pneumococcal conjugate, or PCV. It’s designed to protect

against pneumococcal meningitis, septicaemia and pneumonia, and it’s been hailed

by Britain’s chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson as a life-saver. It’s

already done much to safeguard children in the USA, and will do the same here.

Unfortunately for Sir Liam, the USA keeps very good safety records for

vaccines, and it makes for disturbing reading. In the first two years since the

vaccine has been used in the USA, there have been 4,154 reports of serious side

effects, including 117 deaths. Overall, serious side effects were reported in

15 per cent of all children given the vaccine, an alarmingly high figure.

And just how many lives will the new vaccine save? According to figures

unearthed by WDDTY, 11 children died of pneumococcal meningitis, 2 died of

pneumonia, and 10 died of septicaemia in 2004.

These are, of course, 23 tragic deaths – but so were the 117 who died after

receiving the vaccine. Furthermore, there’s evidence to suggest the vaccine is

not always effective. The USA records show that 34 children who had been

vaccinated still went on to develop invasive pneumococcal infection, suggesting

the vaccine offered no protection whatsoever.

 

Don’t you need all the facts – the pros and the cons – before you allow your

child or grandchild to be vaccinated? These facts are available in our special

vaccine information pack that is sent out – FREE OF CHARGE – to all new

rs to What Doctors Don't Tell You. To claim your pack,

http://www.wddty.co.uk/shop/detail.asp?id=4622 & did= & Curr=GBP

 

 

Why we do the work we do – and why it’s so important

Finally, there might be one question left hanging in the air: why should we

support a journal like What Doctors Don’t Tell You in the first place? Well,

here’s a little behind-the-scenes glimpse of the issues we faced when

researching the vaccine report for you.

We’d already gleaned a great deal of data from ‘insiders’ who tell us things

they really shouldn’t – but we needed more, and the only people who had it were

the vaccines manufacturers. We wanted to know the real safety records of the

vaccines, something the government hadn’t released to the public.

Immediately we were met with a blanket ‘no’. Helpfully we were told by one

drug company spokesperson: “You could try to get the data under the Freedom of

Information Act, but you won’t succeed. The data is commercially sensitive.”

So we did the one thing we could do – we threatened that we would print what

we knew anyway, and they wouldn’t be able to put their side of the story (we

suspected what they knew was more damning than the data we’d collated, but they

weren’t to know that). There followed an awkward period of five days’ silence.

With an hour to go before the deadline passed, the drug company came back with

the data, although it was in a style that would be unfathomable to any but those

most familiar with the scientific jargon employed.

This was a major breakthrough – and, of course, we were the only ones outside

of the drug company to have this data. You couldn’t get it on the web, in drug

safety books, in reports to government committees.

And that’s what we do all the time, and that’s why we matter, even in this age

of the Web and free information. We work very hard to get you the information

that really matters, the key to a long-standing illness, perhaps, or the real

facts that not even your doctor may know.

It’s work we’ve been doing for the public for 16 years – and our paymasters

are only you, the public, whose contributions keep us going. That’s why we need

your support – because if we’re not around to tell you, who is?

 

Medicine has been taken over by the drug industry, the world’s most powerful –

and secretive – industry group. We can fight them together, but we need your

support to do so. But we don’t take that support for granted. That’s why we

are always putting together special ‘thank you’ packs for new rs. To

claim the vaccine pack,

http://www.wddty.co.uk/shop/detail.asp?id=4622 & did= & Curr=GBP

 

Thank you.

 

Bryan Hubbard

Publisher

What Doctors Don’t Tell You

London

 

 

forwarded by

Zeus Information Service

Alternative Views on Health

www.zeusinfoservice.com

All information, data and material contained, presented or provided herein is

for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting

the knowledge or opinion of Zeus Information Service. Subscribe

Free/Un: info

 

 

 

 

 

New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.