Dictator Bush Disobey's over 750 law's

[Guest guest]

I was given this lead by CLG-Citizens for Legitimate Government. It's

official. We have a dictator at the helm of this country. Dictator

Bush is deciding which laws " he " will abide to as long as they do not

conflict with " his " interpretation of our Constitution. Wow, so does

this mean that we can all say, " Hey forget it, that law conflicts

with " my " interpretation of the Constitution, and just ignore it? The

hypocrisy is way beyond knee deep now as I do believe we are in over

our heads.

 

As they continue to " classify " all of their sick actions against us

(like WHAT they are creating in these biogerm labs and what BARDA

will create) and THEY demand full accountability for every move, each

of us makes, and every word WE utter, people need to see the truth

about what THEY are doing.

 

Please read the dictators signing statements (in article below) that

he made after the laws. If you do not see the words of a dictator,

then you are free to insert the title of " lunatic " instead, as both

words are still appropriate, and I can think of many more I feel like

saying that are not appropriate for public commentary about this man

at the head of our country. So I w ill stop now before they decide to

arrest me when they read my email. >snort<

 

Oh yea, another tid bit I got today...

 

Congress may consider mandatory ISP snooping 28 Apr 2006 Last week,

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales gave a speech saying that data

retention by Internet service providers is an " issue that must be

addressed. " Now, a member of the Congressional Internet Caucus is

preparing to introduce an amendment--perhaps during a U.S. House of

Representatives floor vote next week--that would make such data

deletion illegal. Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette's (D) proposal says

that any Internet service that " enables users to access content " must

permanently retain records that would permit police to identify each

user.

 

A Member of The Congressional Internet Caucus?? Good grief do we have

a committee, and government bureaucratic department for everything

today, or is there still ONE thing the American people still get to

vote on besides the lesser of two evils for the next head lunatic of

this country? Anyone else ever heard of this " Congressional Internet

group " our taxes are no doubt paying for? Lemme guess, the head

honchos of AT & T, Verizon and a few other key members like Bill Gates

are benefactors right? Ah, well then, it must be business in

Washington as " usual. "

 

For an update on the woman who was arrested just for daring to try

and hang posters that said, " Bush Step Down " she now is in a face off

with a judge who is demanding a " mental evaluation. " She was found

guilty. Now they are saying she was fighting with police. >sigh< Yes,

she was fighting (53 year old grandmother) trying to DO as they asked

and just take them down. But they arrested her anyway and they

assaulted HER when they did it. Give us all a break please.

 

Activist tells supporters she will refuse test, go to jail

 

30 Apr 2006

 

Activist Carolyn Fisher finds it interesting that a judge believes

anyone who would challenge authority must be mentally unstable... The

53-year-old Cleveland Heights woman was found guilty Friday of

fighting with police who tried to stop her from putting up posters

for an anti-George Bush concert.

 

 

I am with Mrs. Fisher, I find it interesting too that any judge would

believe someone was mentally unstable because they dared to question

authority. How on earth did we ever get the Constitution if no one

ever dared to question so-called authority?

 

Lord help us.

 

This is exactly why I have been trying my best to help you all see

the sham we have in what was formally called mental health care

today. The mental wards will be but a mere holding, and drugging

place, for anyone who disagrees with losing all their rights to this

regime if people do not wake up and smell the coffee. You did know

the new mental label of the week that head doctors have dreamed up is

ALL about people who question authority right? I kid you not. Only

wish I was kidding. More on that to come.

 

 

Take care, be well, and stay informed

 

God Bless

 

Pamela

 

PS: Hey they cannot stop people form putting " Bush Step Down " on

their cars. That's NOT against any city ordiance. But you might as

well as put a big ole target on your car, and say arrest me while

you're at it, because it would probably have the same affect.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Bush quietly claimed authority to disobey over 750 laws

 

30 Apr 2006

 

Dictator Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than

750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the

power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts

with his interpretation of the Constitution. Among the laws Bush said

he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action

provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration

services problems, ''whistle-blower " protections for nuclear

regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference

in federally funded research.

 

Legal scholars say the scope and aggression of Bush's assertions that

he can bypass laws represent a concerted effort to expand his power

at the expense of Congress, upsetting the balance between the

branches of government. The Constitution is clear in assigning to

Congress the power to write the laws and to the president a duty ''to

take care that the laws be faithfully executed. " Bush, however, has

repeatedly declared that he does not need to ''execute " a law he

believes is unconstitutional.

 

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/04/30/bush_

challenges_hundreds_of_laws/

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++

 

Examples of the president's signing statements

 

April 30, 2006

 

Since taking office in 2001, President Bush has issued signing

statements on more than 750 new laws, declaring that he has the power

to set aside the laws when they conflict with his legal

interpretation of the ConstitutionThe federal government is

instructed to follow the statements when it enforces the laws. Here

are 10 examples and the dates Bush signed them

 

March 9: Justice Department officials must give reports to Congress

by certain dates on how the FBI is using the USA Patriot Act to

search homes and secretly seize papers.

 

Bush's signing statement: The president can order Justice Department

officials to withhold any information from Congress if he decides it

could impair national security or executive branch operations.

 

Dec. 30, 2005: US interrogators cannot torture prisoners or otherwise

subject them to cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

 

Bush's signing statement: The president, as commander in chief, can

waive the torture ban if he decides that harsh interrogation

techniques will assist in preventing terrorist attacks.

 

Dec. 30: When requested, scientific information ''prepared by

government researchers and scientists shall be transmitted [to

Congress] uncensored and without delay. "

 

Bush's signing statement: The president can tell researchers to

withhold any information from Congress if he decides its disclosure

could impair foreign relations, national security, or the workings of

the executive branch.

 

Aug. 8: The Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

and its contractors may not fire or otherwise punish an employee

whistle-blower who tells Congress about possible wrongdoing.

 

Bush's signing statement: The president or his appointees will

determine whether employees of the Department of Energy and the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission can give information to Congress.

 

Dec. 23, 2004: Forbids US troops in Colombia from participating in

any combat against rebels, except in cases of self-defense. Caps the

number of US troops allowed in Colombia at 800.

 

Bush's signing statement: Only the president, as commander in chief,

can place restrictions on the use of US armed forces, so the

executive branch will construe the law ''as advisory in nature. "

 

Dec. 17: The new national intelligence director shall recruit and

train women and minorities to be spies, analysts, and translators in

order to ensure diversity in the intelligence community.

 

Bush's signing statement: The executive branch shall construe the law

in a manner consistent with a constitutional clause

guaranteeing ''equal protection " for all. (In 2003, the Bush

administration argued against race-conscious affirmative-action

programs in a Supreme Court case. The court rejected Bush's view.)

 

Oct. 29: Defense Department personnel are prohibited from interfering

with the ability of military lawyers to give independent legal advice

to their commanders.

 

Bush's signing statement: All military attorneys are bound to follow

legal conclusions reached by the administration's lawyers in the

Justice Department and the Pentagon when giving advice to their

commanders.

 

Aug. 5: The military cannot add to its files any illegally gathered

intelligence, including information obtained about Americans in

violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable

searches.

 

Bush's signing statement: Only the president, as commander in chief,

can tell the military whether or not it can use any specific piece of

intelligence.

 

Nov. 6, 2003: US officials in Iraq cannot prevent an inspector

general for the Coalition Provisional Authority from carrying out any

investigation. The inspector general must tell Congress if officials

refuse to cooperate with his inquiries.

 

Bush's signing statement: The inspector general ''shall refrain " from

investigating anything involving sensitive plans, intelligence,

national security, or anything already being investigated by the

Pentagon. The inspector cannot tell Congress anything if the

president decides that disclosing the information would impair

foreign relations, national security, or executive branch operations.

 

Nov. 5, 2002: Creates an Institute of Education Sciences whose

director may conduct and publish research ''without the approval of

the secretary [of education] or any other office of the department. "

 

Bush's signing statement: The president has the power to control the

actions of all executive branch officials, so ''the director of the

Institute of Education Sciences shall [be] subject to the supervision

and direction of the secretary of education. "

 

SOURCE: Charlie Savage