Bush: the Decider Dictator

[Guest guest]

A

Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:37:38 -0700

Bush: the Decider Dictator

 

 

 

 

http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=3D342

 

 

Bush: the Decider Dictator

Tuesday April 18th 2006, 6:17 pm

 

 

I recall months ago, when folks began first murmuring about booting

Donald Rumsfeld, arriving at the obvious conclusion=97Donald Rumsfeld is

not going anywhere, not anymore than Cheney is (short of a heart

attack). Rumsfeld and Cheney are integral to the Straussian neocon

hold on both the Pentagon and the Oval Office. Bush may appoint Rob

Portman to head the Office of Management and Budget, and Dan Senor

(former AIPAC flunky, director of the US-Israel Business Exchange, and

associate at the Carlyle Group) may replace Scott McClellan, but

Cheney and Rumsfeld are like white on rice.

 

It's said Rumsfeld has to go because Iraq is a disaster. I beg to

differ=97things are going swimmingly for the Straussian neocons in Iraq.

Bush never intended to bestow democracy on the Iraqi people, as

claimed, and we all know about the weapons of mass destruction that

never were (and a few of us said this in late 2002, as the Office of

Special Plans began to circulate its propaganda and lies to the likes

of Judith Miller at the New York Times). All of it was and is a

smokescreen for the real deal=97fomenting " civil war " and eventually

breaking Iraq up into three pieces based along ethnic and religious

lines (all the better to rule and divide=97and steal oil, water, and

other natural resources, not to mention turning millions of people

into a pool of cheap labor, as the Israelis have done over the years

to the Palestinians).

 

" I hear the voices and I read the front page and I know the

speculation, " Bush growled at the corporate media. " But I'm the

decider and I decide what's best. And what's best is for Don Rumsfeld

to remain as the secretary of defense. "

 

Translation: Bush is the dictator ( " it would be a heck of a lot

easier " ) decider increasingly unbound by the restraints of law and the

Constitution. In ancient Rome, a dictator received absolute power on a

temporary basis during times of emergency. It is said our emergency is

the war on terror=97terror documented to be an engineered fraud=97but

unlike the Romans before Sulla and Triumvir and the Princeps, Bush's

dictatorial power is arbitrary and unaccountable, not subject to law

and justification.

 

Bush's emerging dictatorship is the most dangerous kind=97unlike the

garden variety military dictatorship put in place through a coup

d'=E9tat, primarily to keep a certain personality (invariably a

knuckle-dragging thug) in power (usually representing a particular

social or economic class), the Bush (or rather Straussian)

dictatorship is extremely dangerous because it represents a

totalitarian ideology=97and thus akin to the totalitarian dictatorships

of Hitler and Stalin. Our " decider " (or rather his handlers) have

embraced the theology of state power and corporatism=97or as Mussolini

called it, fascism.

 

Donald Rumsfeld is crucial to this fascist ideology.

 

A bit of harping on the part of the corporate media=97or factions

therein squeamish over Straussian neocon tactics (shock and awe mass

murder, institutionalized torture, mini-nuke braggadocio)=97will not

change the game plan, a stratagem devised by the neocons as far back

as the first Bush administration (in the good old days, these guys

were called the " crazies, " and Colin Powell later added a colorful

verb before this pejorative).

 

Nothing short of a military coup and tanks rolling up Pennsylvania

Avenue will put an end to this madness.

 

On that fateful day, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush will resemble Hitler

and his lieutenants hiding in their bunkers as the Russians stormed

Berlin.

 

Either that or they will turn the planet into a living hell.