Dr. Death Gets FBI Visit

[Guest guest]

S

Thu, 6 Apr 2006 21:36:28 -0700 (PDT)

Dr. Death Gets FBI Visit

 

 

 

 

 

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/060406fbivisit.htm

 

 

 

 

Dr. Death Gets FBI Visit

 

Media, colleagues continue to portray him as the innocent victim

 

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com

April 6 2006

 

The Austin-American Statesman today reports that Dr Eric Pianka,

who has been at the center of a media firestorm for wishing death

upon 90% of humanity via an airborne ebola bio-attack, today received

a visit from the FBI after he was reported as a potential terrorist.

 

As we and others like ZD Net previously reported, Dr. Death types

across academia and their followers have access to the very weapons

of mass destruction that would enable them to enact their 'final

solution'.

 

Both UT Arlington and UT Austin have contracts with Sandia National

Laboratories which includes research related to " chemical and

biological weapons. "

 

Openly stating a desire to see 90% of humanity wiped out by means of

releasing a bio-weapon and also having access to biological weapons is

in our eyes an alarming precedent.

 

In addition, in 2003 biological weapons watchdogs asked the US

National Institutes of Health (NIH) to suspend biodefense funding f

or the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston due to

the Medical Branch's secrecy about its research on biological weapons

agents and its refusal to comply with federal biosafety guidelines.

 

It comes as no surprise that, according to the Statesman, hanging on

the wall of Pianka's office is a picture of him proudly dressed as

Charles Darwin.

 

— Dr. Death is a social Darwinist Malthusian who believes in the

virtues of eugenics, a movement characterized by forced sterilization

in the US, fueled by Carnegie and Rockefeller funding, and responsible

for the birth of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany.

 

It was Charles Darwin's cousin, Sir Francis Galton, who first brought

eugenics to the US at the turn of the last century. According to the

San Francisco Chronicle,

 

" The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in

California, decades before Hitler came to power. California

eugenicists played an important, although little-known, role in the

American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing....

 

Elitists, utopians and so-called progressives fused their smoldering

race fears and class bias with their desire to make a better world.

 

They reinvented Galton's eugenics into a repressive and racist ideology.

 

The intent: Populate the Earth with vastly more of their own

socioeconomic and biological kind -- and less or none of everyone else. "

 

This is what Pianka embraced when he told the audience at Lamar

University, " Smarter people have fewer kids. "

 

He said those who don't have a conscience about the Earth

will inherit the Earth, " ...because those who care make fewer babies

and those that didn't care made more babies. " He said we will evolve

as uncaring people, and " I think IQs are falling for the same reason,

too. "

 

We have highlighted cases where under the sterilization program in the

US, which ran until 1979, people like Ruth Morris were forcibly

sterilized, used as guinea pigs in medical experiments, and denied the

opportunity ever to have children because the state deemed their IQ

not to be high enough.

 

Virginia Governor Mark Warner had to publicly apologize for the

program in 2002.

 

The practice continues to this day in China, a model which

Pianka advocated when he said that the one child policy, enforced by a

brutal police state, was a good thing.

 

Pianka and his ilk have embraced a new form of eugenics that forms

a crossroads with ecology. Whereas the pioneers of eugenics

like Margaret Sanger and Hitler discussed racial hygiene, Pianka

professes the need for global hygiene and the disease is human beings.

 

One of Pianka's followers states on her own blog, " He's a radical

thinker, that one! I mean, he's basically advocating for the death of

all but 10% of the current population!

And at the risk of sounding just as radical, I think he's right. "

 

" It's the harsh reality that many people alive right now should be dead.

 

And even harsher to think that the world would be better off

with them dead too, " writes 'Serenity'.

 

After lamenting how her own grandparents should be dead, she then goes

on to echo Pianka's eugenics stance in stating,

 

" An insightful observation was made during the talk that education

should be the key to learning how to take care of the Earth, but the

problem is that the educated have fewer children and the uneducated

have many children.

 

So eventually, the uneducated will take over the Earth.

It may have already happened. "

 

Again, the acceptance of this kind of rhetoric is exactly why Hitler

was able to pursue his nightmare vision of the super race, where only

the strong and enlightened ones chosen by the the state would have the

right to live.

 

— These sick bastards have the nerve to couch their feverish pro-death

rants in the context that they're lovingly caring for the planet and

that they're actually pro-life!

 

The disconnect and duality of this insanity is difficult to behold.

 

In addition, another Biology student and supporter of Pianka, Rebecca

Calisi (pictured below), mirrored this Nazi ideology when she

expressed her loathsome desire that the world would be a better place

with every single human being dead!

 

" There is NO DENYING the natural world would be a better place without

people - ALL people!

— Not a selective bunch. Get it straight, " wrote Calisi.

 

And the Associated Press and local NBC news makes out as if we're the

radicals here for pointing out that killing off the entire human race

with biological weapons is wrong!

 

If Pianka started barbecuing babies in the UT cafeteria and we opposed

it, would Pianka be portrayed as the victim and us as the extremists?

 

The Statesman article quotes one of Pianka's colleagues David Hillis,

who defends him by saying that Pianka, " has such a passion for life

and diversity. How anyone could paint him as pro-death is unbelievable. "

 

The man who said AIDS didn't kill people fast enough for his liking is

not pro-death? The man who supports China's brutally enforced one

child policy is not pro-death?

 

The man who said he was " looking forward to the collapse " after a

disease controls " the scourge of humanity " is not pro-death? The man

who proudly displays an ebola plush toy on his front desk is not

pro-death?

 

Did we just enter the twilight zone here?

 

" Pianka said [he] only meant to warn about the potential for epidemics

in the face of uncontrolled population growth, " states the article.

 

If it was meant as a warning then why did Pianka order the cameras

to be shut off before his speech and why did he say that the general

public was not yet ready for what he had to say?

 

If it was meant as a sober warning then why did 95% of his students

and peers jump to their feet and raucously applause him at the end of it?

 

Dr. Death and his drooling disciples should not be allowed to incite

genocide and promote Nazi models of eugenics without encountering

resistance.

 

We do not in any way advocate death threats or intimidation towards

Mr. Pianka or any of his students. However, the repugnant response

of the establishment media has been to soft-peddle the story and paint

Pianka as t he victim. This is exactly why we will continue to

challengeand counter monsters whose ideals if acted upon would result

in the indiscriminate slaughter of our entire families.