Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[NVIC] Over-Vaccinating Pets

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION

CENTER

Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

#8122

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

" Protecting the health and informed consent

rights of children since 1982. "

 

================================================================================\

==========

BL Fisher Note:

 

One-size-fits-all vaccination policies do not

work with dogs and cats and

they don't work with humans either. Just as there

is biodiversity among

different breeds of animals, there is

biodiversity among humans. To suggest

that every animal or every human being will

respond the same way to

vaccination - or any medical intervention - is

illogical given the different

genetic factors inherent in biodiversity. Until

vaccine policies acknowledge

the real risks and needs of the individual rather

than dismissing

individuals as expendable in service to the

community, too many humans and

pets will become tragic casualities of the

one-size-fits-all approach.

 

It appears that veterinarians are more willing to

consider the individual

risks and needs of pets than pediatricians and

public health officials are

willing to consider the individual risks and

needs of children when it comes

to vaccination.

 

 

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-adcova4687741apr03,0,3536936,print

column?coll=ny-rightrail-columnist

 

Newsday

 

A new shot at vaccines

Inoculating your dog annually sometimes can do

more harm than good. Experts

say it's best to customize a program for your

pet.

 

Denise Flaim

Animal House

 

 

April 3, 2006

 

 

In her popular agility classes, Marcy Pratt of

Lido Beach teaches dog owners

to zoom their corgis through tunnels and sail

their Australian shepherds

over jumps.

 

But as she chatted with the handlers on the

sidelines, she realized there

was another area they needed help navigating.

 

" I found that most of them had their dogs

vaccinated for everything, every

year, " Pratt says, even though the trend in

veterinary medicine has been to

tailor vaccine programs to a dog's lifestyle and

risk. " And I had a couple

of students whose dogs had had adverse reactions,

including one that almost

died. "

 

The clarion call among veterinarians in recent

years has been a movement

away from reflexive annual " shots " and toward a

more individualized

approach: In its 2002 vaccine report for dogs and

cats, the American

Veterinary Medical Association rejected the idea

of " one-size-fits-all "

protocols, suggested that unnecessary

overstimulation of the immune system

might incur health risks, and divided vaccines

into " core " and " non-core "

categories.

 

A year later, the American Animal Hospital

Association went a step further:

In its landmark Canine Vaccination Guidelines, it

added a third category -

not recommended at all - and gave suggested

intervals of vaccination for

each vaccine. Earlier this year, the association

published an update of the

guidelines, adding some new information about

specific vaccines and the

vaccination needs of shelter dogs.

 

The original 2003 guidelines were " largely driven

by the veterinary

profession understanding that the way we have

always done things may not be

the way they will continue to be done, " says

veterinarian Michael P. Andrews

of Riverside, Calif., the association's

president. The fact that the 2003

protocols did not result in any obvious disease

outbreaks reinforces the

guidelines' message that " less is better, " he

says.

 

But as far as Pratt could tell from her students'

stories, practice hasn't

caught up with theory. So she organized a seminar

by veterinary immunologist

Ron Schultz of the University of Wisconsin School

of Veterinary in Madison,

arguably the expert's expert in the field of

canine epidemiology. Since the

1970s, Schultz has conducted trials for

manufacturers to determine duration

of immunity, and he was on the task force that

updated the association's

guidelines. Seventy-five people attended the

March 18 lecture in a church

gym in Syosset; Pratt says a couple of local vets

bought tickets, but she

didn't see any in the audience.

 

Guidelines vs. habits

 

Schultz says that while some vets have kept up

with changing times, old

habits die hard. " We have a lot of work yet to

change the attitudes of most

vets in practice. We are trying to get them away

from the annual thing and

get them to understand that immunity doesn't stop

on the precise day " that

the vaccine expires.

 

The association's guidelines identify four

vaccines as " core, " or critical

for every puppy to receive: distemper,

parvovirus, adenovirus-2 and rabies.

For the first three, the guidelines recommend a

puppy series, a one-year

booster and then revaccination no more frequently

than every three years, if

not less often. (There is no such flexibility

with rabies, which, by New

York State law, must be administered every three

years.)

 

The remaining vaccines in the marketplace are

either not recommended, or are

considered " non-core, " meaning that a dog's

individual situation might

require them. A pooch who lives in an area where

leptospirosis is endemic -

including parts of Long Island - might be a

candidate for that short-lived

vaccine; ditto for one owned by globe-hoppers who

spends time at a boarding

facility where bordetella (kennel cough) is a

constant possibility.

 

Schultz says some vets resist this nuanced

approach to vaccination because

of habit and economics. Urging a client to come

in for annual shots is more

compelling than a postcard cheerily announcing

that it's " wellness exam "

time.

 

" There's no evidence that a one-year requirement

improves compliance with

vaccination, " Schultz adds. " At one point, it was

thought if we make people

vaccinate every year, we're going to vaccinate

more dogs. What it turned out

to be was that we were having the same dogs

revaccinated annually. "

 

Labels aren't guidelines

 

Another problem is byzantine labeling and clever

marketing on the part of

vaccine manufacturers.

 

" The label means nothing, " Schultz says simply,

noting that vaccines

licensed for one year and three years are often

the same product. " The label

has an arbitrary and capricious annual

revaccination requirement, and it

takes an act of Congress to take it off " -

literally. Schultz says the

Department of Agriculture has applied to remove

the language, a legislative

process that he estimates will take seven years.

 

While many veterinary colleges have moved toward

vaccine protocols of every

three years for core vaccines that are " modified

live viruses, " or MLV, such

a parvo, distemper and adenovirus, others suggest

that immunity lasts far

longer - Schultz among them. " Duration of

immunity is whatever is determined

by the studies, and those studies show that

duration of immunity is seven to

nine years, which is a lifetime. "

 

Too much, too soon

 

Veterinary immunologist Jean Dodds of Santa

Monica, Calif., another popular

lecturer on the vaccine topic, stresses that

overvaccination can overwhelm

the immune systems of dogs, in particular certain

purebreds that are

genetically predisposed to adverse reactions. (In

a recent study by

veterinarian George Moore of Purdue University in

West Lafayette, Ind.,

dachshunds, pugs, Boston terriers, miniature

pinschers and Chihuahuas showed

the highest rate of adverse effects to vaccines.)

 

" The recently weaned young puppy or kitten

entering a new environment is at

greater risk here, as its relatively immature

immune system can be

temporarily or more permanently harmed, " says

Dodds. " Consequences in later

life may be the increased susceptibility to

chronic debilitating diseases. "

 

Dodds adds that because vaccine labels themselves

state that vaccines should

only be given to healthy animals, owners should

not vaccinate chronically

ill animals, adding that they can even apply to

their state for a waiver of

the rabies vaccine requirement if their vet

writes a letter documenting the

animal's frail health.

 

For owners who worry about their dogs' immunity

lapsing, Dodds recommends

titers, or blood tests that can measure antibody

levels.

 

But being progressive while the rest of the world

inches to catch up can be

frustrating. Karen Tragesser, 50, of Lynbrook,

takes her 8-year-old golden

retriever, Dillon, to Pratt's classes. She says

her vet has " never been one

to push vaccination, " and Dillon gets a booster

only every three years. With

a new puppy on the horizon, and Dillon getting on

in years, Tragesser is

thinking of titering for " core " diseases such as

distemper, parvo and

adenovirus.

 

" If you want to do activities with your dog, you

need proof of current

vaccination, " including the above trio, Tragesser

says. The group that

certifies Dillon as a therapy dog will not accept

titers as proof that he is

adequately protected, and so she will have to

choose between doing what she

feels is best for him health-wise - and letting

him make visits to hospitals

and nursing homes.

 

As for Pratt, she's left with the acronym that

Schultz used to open his

lecture. " He said every dog needs TLV - training,

love and vaccination, " she

says.

 

The key is that only the middle one needs to be

unlimited.

 

To read the American Animal Hospital

Association's complete 2006 Canine

Vaccination Guidelines, go to www.aah anet.org.

 

LESS IS MORE FOR CATS, TOO

 

When it comes to progressive attitudes about

vaccination, cats were way out

ahead.

 

" We were the first out with vaccination

guidelines in 1997-98, " says

veterinarian James Richards of the Cornell Feline

Health Center in Ithaca,

N.Y., and past president of the American

Association of Feline

Practitioners.

 

One of the motivators was the incidence of

injection-site sarcomas in cats.

" Even though it's a rare event " - Richards puts

the " best estimate " at one

to three out of every 10,000 vaccinated cats

developing cancer at the

vaccination site - " it's a very serious one. "

 

As with dogs, reflexively vaccinating felines was

the order of the day until

15 or so years ago. " Back when I started as a

vet, we had vaccines for three

or four infectious cat diseases, and we didn't

think a whole lot about how

often they needed to be given, " he says. " At this

moment, we have vaccines

for 10, in various combinations. "

 

Richards urges cat owners to think about vaccines

as a double-edged sword:

necessary medical procedures that also have their

risks and downsides.

" Vaccination is an elective medical procedure

that's going to be individual

for each critter instead of a knee-jerk sort of

thing. Becoming informed

yourself is very important. "

 

To that end, he encourages cat owners to discuss

vaccination with their

vet - and if their vet is unresponsive to their

questions, to find someone

who does respond. A good starting point for

discussion is the current

association guidelines, available at

www.aafponline.org - for now, at least.

Richards is convening an international panel of

feline specialists to

revisit the guidelines, a process he hopes to

complete by summer.

 

While he doesn't know precisely what the update

will say, he can guess the

tune: " The key is using the right vaccines

absolutely only as often as we

need, " he concludes. " Most assuredly, less is

more. "

 

=============================================

News is a free service of the National

Vaccine Information

Center and is supported through membership

donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how

to protect your informed consent rights

http://www.nvic.org

 

Become a member and support NVIC's work

 

https://www.nvic.org/making%20cash%20donations.htm

 

To sign up for a free e-mail subscription

http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm

 

To from this list, please go to

http://nvic.org/emaillistunsub.htm or send an

email to news-request and type UNSUBSCRIBE

in the body of the email.

 

NVIC is funded through individual membership

donations and does not receive government funding.

Barbara Loe Fisher, President and Co-founder.

NOTE: This is not an interactive e-mail list.

Please do not respond to messages.

 

 

 

" When the power of love becomes stronger than the love of power, we will have

peace. "

Jimi Hendrix

 

http://www.lightmovie.com/thelight/TheLight.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...