Election Fraud: The Dragon at the Gate.

[Guest guest]

There's something a bit strange about what you say. Oddly, 98% of those

" richest 1%, " are registered republicans. Very strange. And, they give 98% of

their political contributions to the republican party. Why do suppose that is,

if the democrats showed the same inclination to support these rich folk, as do

the republicans?

jp

-

califpacific

Friday, March 31, 2006 4:17 AM

Election Fraud: " The Dragon at the

Gate. "

 

 

A

Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:59:17 -0500

Election Fraud: " The Dragon at the Gate. "

 

 

(PEOPLE MUST REALIZE THAT THE RICHEST 1% IN THE U.S.A. HAS TWO

POLITICAL PARTIES REPRESENTING THEM AND LOOKING OUT FOR THEIR

INTERESTS. THE OTHER 99% HAS NO ONE.)

 

 

OpEdNews.com

Original Article at

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ernest_p_060330_the_democrats_3a_missi.h\

tm

 

The Democrats: Missing in Action

 

By Ernest Partridge

 

Watching the Democrats, one would think that they never gave up

believing in Santa Claus.

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

, " John Polifronio "

<counterpnt wrote:

>

> There's something a bit strange about what you say. Oddly, 98% of

those " richest 1%, " are registered republicans. Very strange. And,

they give 98% of their political contributions to the republican

party. Why do suppose that is, if the democrats showed the same

inclination to support these rich folk, as do the republicans?

> jp

 

 

Probably because for the same reason given by Willie Sutton when he

was asked " Why he robbed banks? " His reply was " because that is where

the money is "

 

There is a lot more ways to unduly influence people other than campaign

contributions. Isn't that why the democrats became republican lite in the first

place. To get in line for all of that corporate money, benefits and power? Also,

being as how they are number 2 in the pay for play game, they can probably then

be purchased for much less money. Haven't you seen all of your life how people

kiss up to rich guys? Well now it has been institutionalized on a national

level.

 

 

Califpacific

 

 

 

 

 

> -

> califpacific

>

> Friday, March 31, 2006 4:17 AM

> Election Fraud: " The Dragon

at the Gate. "

>

>

> A

> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:59:17 -0500

> Election Fraud: " The Dragon at the Gate. "

>

>

> (PEOPLE MUST REALIZE THAT THE RICHEST 1% IN THE U.S.A. HAS TWO

> POLITICAL PARTIES REPRESENTING THEM AND LOOKING OUT FOR THEIR

> INTERESTS. THE OTHER 99% HAS NO ONE.)

>

>

> OpEdNews.com

> Original Article at

>

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ernest_p_060330_the_democrats_3a_missi.h\

tm

>

> The Democrats: Missing in Action

>

> By Ernest Partridge

>

> Watching the Democrats, one would think that they never gave up

> believing in Santa Claus.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I asnswered your question. Now let me ask you a question.

 

Why have the top level or party leading democrats not stood up against the

thieves, liars, and crooks, in order to help or protect middleclass america, on

any of these issues, or many other important issues, for many years now.

 

 

Voter Fraud

Illegal and Immoral wars

Banrupting the Treasury

The Non Patriot Acts

The Shifting Of More Wealth To The Top 1%.

Holding Politicians Accountable.

The Subverting of Basic Truths ...about the real reasons behind most

of what passes for why each step taken in the downfall of our country

and democracy in the USA.

Giving up and undercutting all basic civil rights.

Shifting Of All Power And Benefits To Big Corporations and away from

citizens.

Watching The Bought And Paid For Judiciary pull the rug out from us.

Standing By With Their Thumbs Up Their Arse.. while our country goes

down the tubes into fascism.

And About A Thousand Other Things.

 

Almost all of them , with very few exceptions, run over and fall into

line just like the repugs.

 

Frank

 

PS. I don't concure with your figures that the dems only receive 2% of

2% from the top richest 1%. But they sure look to me like a bunch of

guys that want to play ball and not rock the boat too and are probably

looking down the road when " republican lite " will be a more saleable brand

 

 

 

 

, " califpacific "

<califpacific wrote:

>

> , " John Polifronio "

> <counterpnt@> wrote:

> >

> > There's something a bit strange about what you say. Oddly, 98% of

> those " richest 1%, " are registered republicans. Very strange. And,

> they give 98% of their political contributions to the republican

> party. Why do suppose that is, if the democrats showed the same

> inclination to support these rich folk, as do the republicans?

> > jp

>

>

> Probably because for the same reason given by Willie Sutton when he

> was asked " Why he robbed banks? " His reply was " because that is where

> the money is "

>

> There is a lot more ways to unduly influence people other than

campaign contributions. Isn't that why the democrats became republican

lite in the first place. To get in line for all of that corporate

money, benefits and power? Also, being as how they are number 2 in the

pay for play game, they can probably then be purchased for much less

money. Haven't you seen all of your life how people kiss up to rich

guys? Well now it has been institutionalized on a national level.

>

>

> Califpacific

>

>

>

>

>

> > -

> > califpacific

> >

> > Friday, March 31, 2006 4:17 AM

> > Election Fraud: " The Dragon

> at the Gate. "

> >

> >

> > A

> > Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:59:17 -0500

> > Election Fraud: " The Dragon at the Gate. "

> >

> >

> > (PEOPLE MUST REALIZE THAT THE RICHEST 1% IN THE U.S.A. HAS TWO

> > POLITICAL PARTIES REPRESENTING THEM AND LOOKING OUT FOR THEIR

> > INTERESTS. THE OTHER 99% HAS NO ONE.)

> >

> >

> > OpEdNews.com

> > Original Article at

> >

>

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ernest_p_060330_the_democrats_3a_missi.h\

tm

> >

> > The Democrats: Missing in Action

> >

> > By Ernest Partridge

> >

> > Watching the Democrats, one would think that they never gave up

> > believing in Santa Claus.

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Before you ask me why the " democrats " have not stood up against tyranny,

answer the question: why haven't the " republicans " stood up against tyranny?

 

The courage you're looking for in the dem party, isn't a characteristic of

democrats, or certainly not a characteristic of republicans; it's a

characterisitic found in " some " human beings. Most democrats are spineless, not

because they're democrats (I can't believe I'm saying this), but because they're

human beings. What you think is capitulation to the republicans, what you call

foolishly, " republican lite, " is nothing but human nature, and it isn't

appearing for the first time, at the moment in history, that the Bush

administration is creating chaos everywhere. What you call republican lite,

has always been there. The republicans are a party that is displaying utter and

complete submission to the will of their tyrant, whoever it is; even if it's a

halfwit like Bush. The democrats, with notable examples, are, to use Nader's

words " a little better, " than the republicans. That's the way it has always

been. That's why I'm a democrat; because they're a " little better " than the

other side. That's all I expect from political parties. I vote for the party

that's a " little better, " and then I go away, and do the real work that will

bring change in society. Face it. Do something about it. Because if you're

going to see the change you want, " you " are going to have to make it happen.

You, yes " you. "

jp

 

 

 

 

-

califpacific

Friday, March 31, 2006 1:08 PM

Re: Election Fraud: " The Dragon at the

Gate. "

 

 

I asnswered your question. Now let me ask you a question.

 

Why have the top level or party leading democrats not stood up against the

thieves, liars, and crooks, in order to help or protect middleclass america, on

any of these issues, or many other important issues, for many years now.

 

(snip)

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

, " John Polifronio "

<counterpnt wrote:

>

> Before you ask me why the " democrats " have not stood up against

>tyranny, answer the question: why haven't the " republicans " stood up

>against tyranny?

 

The Rebublican poiticians are not standing up to tyranny, so far, because they

have been benefiting along the way on the road to tyranny. That is the only

reason that makes sense to me. So again why aren't most the democrats doing

anything? If the democratic rank and file are being crapped on why aren't their

leaders screaming to high heavens? Maybe because they no longer have their rank

and file as their prime interest.

 

 

 

 

>

> The courage you're looking for in the dem party, isn't a >

>characteristic of democrats, or certainly not a characteristic of >

>republicans; it's a characterisitic found in " some " human beings.

>Most democrats are spineless, not because they're democrats (I can't

>believe I'm saying this), but because they're human beings. What you

>think is capitulation to the republicans, what you call foolishly,

> " republican lite, " is nothing but human nature, and it isn't

>appearing for the first time, at the moment in history, that the Bush

>administration is creating chaos everywhere. What you call

>republican lite, has always been there.

 

 

That is utter foolishness. The leaders of the democratic party

consciously and deliberated chose a course of action to take them to

the right. They modeled themselves to be more in accordance with what

is acceptable to Big Business and less as to what is best for the

populace.

 

 

 

>The republicans are a party that is displaying utter and complete

>submission to the will of their tyrant, whoever it is; even if it's a

>halfwit like Bush.

 

 

The subject is the democratic party and instead of being honest about

that, you want to keep talking about the republicans. The repugs

certainly do not represent the interests of the people, but more and

more over the years neither do the democrats.

 

 

 

>The democrats, with notable examples, are, to use Nader's words " a

>little better, " than the republicans. That's the way it has always

>been. That's why I'm a democrat; because they're a " little better "

>than the other side. That's all I expect from political parties. I

>vote for the party that's a " little better, "

 

That is one of the poorest excusses that I have ever heard to support

some political party. That attitude doesn't bring about change, that

attitude perpetuates the staus quo. It is exactly because of such nonsense as...

 

" That's all I expect from political parties. I vote for the party that's a

" little better, "

 

that we now find ourselves about to lose our country and all that it means.

Nader also said that the top 5% have two political parties representing them and

the other 95% have none.

 

If the bastards sought election to be our leaders then it seems reasonable to

expect them to lead, not lie down. If they can't lead then they do not deserve

to be in there. They should be thrown out on their asses. As for the repubs, the

conservatives ought to clean house and put all of those thrown out in jail.

Everybody both right and left better wake up and take their parties back in the

hope that we all may once again have a livable country.

 

 

>and then I go away, and do the real work that will bring change in

>society.

 

Sounds good, but means nothing on the face value of the statement. In

light of the previous statements, I rather doubt the value of any push

for change.

 

 

>Face it. Do >something about it. Because if you're going to see the

>change you want, " you " are going to have to make it happen. You,

>yes " you. "

> jp

 

I am supposed to do something about it? but I shouldn't expect

anything from those poor democrat politicos, who are let off with that

poor excuse of that " they are just people " because they will do

nothing. Hell if I have to do all of the work, what the hell do we

want or need them for? If their job is not to be leaders and not to stand up and

represent us, then just what in the hell is their job? Which is exactly what I

said in the first place.

 

PS. I am on the net every day doing something about it. I am trying to

make people aware of many things. What are you doing besides making

excuses to give cover to a bunch of sellouts.?

 

 

 

 

>

>

>

>

> -

> califpacific

>

> Friday, March 31, 2006 1:08 PM

> Re: Election Fraud: " The

Dragon at the Gate. "

>

>

> I asnswered your question. Now let me ask you a question.

>

> Why have the top level or party leading democrats not stood up

against the thieves, liars, and crooks, in order to help or protect

middleclass america, on any of these issues, or many other important

issues, for many years now.

>

> (snip)

>

>

>