GMW: In George's Club

[Guest guest]

ubject: GMW: In George's Club

" GM WATCH " <info

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:27:58 +0100

 

 

 

 

GM WATCH daily

http://www.gmwatch.org

---

This puts the recent Indo-US farm pact into a wider political context -

one where if you're not in George Bush's club you risk political

isolation, market exclusion and even possible military assault. But if

you

are in George's club, you face the opening up of your markets to the

likes of Monsanto with all the misery that goes with that.

---

In George's Club

Andy Rowell, 13 March 2006

http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=Content & pa=showpage & pid=463

 

Once again the sheer hypocrisy and brutality of American foreign policy

has been laid bare for all to see. In his latest dealings with Iran

and India, Bush's foreign doctrine boils down to whether you are in

" George's Club " or not.

 

Firstly let us look at Iran, a country that is currently seen as an

international pariah over its stand-off with the international community

because of its nuclear programme. Iran's dispute with America shows what

happens if you are not in George's Club. Iran is a signatory to the UN

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that allows countries to develop

nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as long as they do not develop

nuclear weapons.

 

The US is adamant that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons as

well as develop civil nuclear power, so it wants to stop the Iranian

nuclear programme. Although the process is still in the hands of the UN

International Atomic Energy Agency, who were debating the issue last

week,

the US wants Iran taken to the UN Security Council. Moreover America

has been asking for sanctions to be applied. And now it has threatened

Iran with military action, even though the diplomatic route is not yet

exhausted.

 

Earlier this month, British Members of Parliament (MPs) went on a visit

to America. There they met the Bush appointed US ambassador to the

United Nations, John Bolton, a real hawk's hawk. Bolton is never one to

mince his words. He told the MPs that military action could bring Iran's

nuclear programme to a halt if all diplomatic efforts fail. " We can hit

different points along the line " , said Bolton. " You only have to take

out one part of their nuclear operation to take the whole thing down " .

 

In case anyone was in doubt what Bolton meant by " hitting different

points along the line " , Bolton reiterated his message when he spoke to

the

leading US-Israeli lobbyists, American-Israel public affairs

committee, last week: " The longer we wait to confront the threat Iran

poses, the

harder and more intractable it will become to solve " said Bolton. He

then went on to argue that America must use " all the tools at our

disposal to stop the threat that the Iranian regime poses. "

 

" All the tools " is another way of saying the military. To hawks like

Bush and Bolton it does not matter that Iran could be trying to develop a

civil nuclear programme. What matters is that they are not an ally in

the War on Terror and are not to be trusted as they are seen as a rogue

state. They are not in George's Club.

 

Now take another country that is not a signatory to the NPT, but has

developed both nuclear power and nuclear weapons: India. All logic would

suggest that if Iran is a pariah state for trying to develop nuclear

technology then India should be top of Bush's countries of concern as it

has both nuclear power and nuclear weapons, yet India has never signed

the one treaty that is meant to regulate countries that have nuclear

technology.

 

But rather than force India to sign up to the NPT, what did Bush do

earlier this month on his first trip to India? Bush signed an " historic

agreement on nuclear power, " whereby India was granted access to US

nuclear technology, in return for opening up its nuclear facilities for

inspection.

 

" It is not an easy job for the Prime Minister to conclude this

agreement; it is not easy for the American President to conclude this

agreement

but it's a necessary agreement " argued Bush, as he stood shoulder to

shoulder with India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. " It is one that will

help both our peoples. I applaud you for your courage and leadership " .

 

Some argue that what Bush is doing is rewarding India for bad

behaviour. It is certainly not going to stop India's nuclear

programme, or even

the construction of nuclear weapons. The deal, says Singh " means that

India will not be constrained in any way in building future nuclear

facilities, whether civilian or military, as per our national

requirements. "

 

So India can build nuclear power stations, Iran cannot. India can build

nuclear weapons, Iran cannot. That is because India is trusted and Iran

is not. As the BBC reported on the nuclear negotiations " the United

States government is saying to India 'we trust you, you're one of us, we

want you to join our club' " . The bottom line is that America wants India

in George's Club. It is seen as a mutually beneficial ally, even if the

deal smells of hypocrisy.

 

Alongside the nuclear deal, there was another deal done by the US and

India that also smells of hypocrisy. It is called the " Indo-US

Knowledge Initiative in Agricultural Research and Education. "

 

The deal is being touted by Bush as " the second green revolution " that

will feed India's growing population. " By working together, the United

States and India will develop better ways to grow crops and get them to

market and lead a second green revolution, " said Bush. " This initiative

will invest 100 million dollars to encourage exchanges between American

and Indian scientists and to promote joint research to improve farming

technology. "

 

But what knowledge is the US pushing onto India? It is the

controversial technology of agricultural biotechnology whereby plants

have key

characteristics genetically modified.

 

Critics of the agricultural deal argue that whilst India's first

revolution was about improving traditional plant breeding for the

benefit of

their farmers, this second revolution is all about imposing American

technology on India.

 

These critics contend that the Initiative could spell disaster for

local indigenous farming knowledge. Already many Indian cotton farmers

are

facing a crisis as their recently-introduced American genetically

modified cotton crop has failed. " There is a complete blackout at the

top

about what's going wrong. This is the worst agrarian crises since

Independence, " says Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst on India's

Forum

for Biotechnology and Food Security.

 

Sharma fears that this new Initiative will just make the crisis worse.

" India could become the dumping ground for all the genetically modified

crops that there are no takers for in Europe and many other parts of

the world, " he says.

 

We can get an indication of what is going to happen by looking at the

board of the Initiative. From the American side it includes Monsanto,

the leading US company pushing genetically modified crops and Wal-Mart,

the world's largest retailer.

 

Both companies are controversial. Monsanto because of its brutal

campaign to force people to eat genetically modified crops, about which

environmental and health questions are unresolved. Wal-Mart has been

accused

of paying low-wages and forcing competitors out of business.

 

An article in the Hindu newspaper reported on the first meeting of the

Initiative's Board in December 2005. " Representatives of the Wal-Mart

food chain and the Monsanto Seed Corporation were keen on using the

Initiative for retailing in agriculture and on trade aspects. Transgenic

research in crops, animals and fisheries would be a substantial part of

the collaboration in biotechnology, requiring India to pledge huge

funds " .

 

Poor Indian farmers do not matter to Bush, but the raw economic power

of global giants Monsanto and Wal-Mart do. Bush will promote their

interests because they are in George's Club. Poor farmers are not.

Indian

papers are now abuzz with what the new deal will mean for the millions

of poor Indian farmers, many of whom who have planted Monsanto's

genetically modified cotton and who have suffered poor harvests. Sources

quoted by The Times of India say that " the opening up of the Indian

market

as a result of the initiative would benefit Monsanto more than any other

company.

 

So Bush is forcing Indian farmers to accept genetically modified crops

that have not been a commercial success. Because Monsanto's crops have

failed it has left many farmers with large debts and facing ruin. Some

have committed suicide as a result. Just last month India NDTV reported

how farmers in the key agricultural province of Andhra Pradesh were

" grappling with crippling debt and desperation and choosing to end their

lives after their cotton crop failed " .

 

The TV programme went on to add that most farmers believed that

Monsanto's genetically modified crops were " introduced to put an end

to their

problems " but the crop has now " become one of the biggest causes of

farmer suicides " . One twenty-year-old widow told NDTV that her husband

killed himself after running up crippling debts. " We grew Raasi hybrid

seeds with great hope but it has ruined us ... Now he is dead and I have

debts and two children. What should I do? "

 

So you see how the international politics of " George's Club " works. It

favours the rich over the poor. If you are in favour with Bush you get

access to markets and favours. If you are not you get threats and

intimidation. This is the new world politics, whether we like it or not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

------------------