Eli Lilly - Mercury Poisoning from Vaccines ...

[Guest guest]

Great timeline on what Lilly knew and kept denying. Thanks.

 

 

SSRI-Research@

>

> Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:07:12 -0500

> [sSRI-Research] Eli Lilly - Mercury Poisoning from Vaccines

> known as early as April 1930 to be dangerous

>

>

> Update on Mercury Poisoning from Vaccine

> http://www.mercola.com/2002/mar/30/mercury_vaccine.htm

>

> The Dallas-based law firm of Waters & Kraus announced today that

> it has received documents as a result of the discovery process in the

> case of Counter v. Eli Lilly & Company, et al, currently pending in

> Brazoria County, Texas that come from the archives of Eli Lilly & Company.

>

> The documents clearly demonstrate that Lilly's thimerosal

> product, the mercury-based vaccine preservative implicated in a number

> of recent law suits as causing neurological injury to infants, was

> known as early as April 1930 to be dangerous.

>

> In its apparent eagerness to promote and market the product, in

> September, 1930, Eli Lilly secretly sponsored a " human toxicity " study

> on patients already known to be dying of meningococcal meningitis.

> Senior partner Andrew Waters stated that, " Lilly then cited this study

> repeatedly for decades as proof that thimerosal was of low toxicity

> and harmless to humans.

>

> They never revealed to the scientific community or the public

> the highly questionable nature of the original research. "

>

> While Eli Lilly made every effort to corrupt the medical and

> scientific literature, the process of arranging to publish the results

> of its questionable secret study, other researchers have provided

> Lilly with numerous articles since the 1930's indicating concerns

> about thimerosal and its potential hazard to humans who might be

> exposed or injected with the substance.

>

> The evidence clearly demonstrates that Eli Lilly was advised

> repeatedly that their conclusions of low toxicity were not warranted

> and that they failed to pass the information on to appropriate federal

> and public health authorities. The following time line illustrates

> some, but by no means all, of the documentary evidence on this point

> from Lilly's internal files:

>