Fwd: Texas peace group on terror watch list

[Guest guest]

Makes me wonder if this group is on the FBI's " terror watch " list?

 

Alobar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

" In a guest lecture at the University of Texas School of Law on

Wednesday, FBI Supervisory Senior

Resident Agent G. Charles Rasner listed Indymedia, Food Not Bombs, and

the Communist Party of Texas

as " Terrorist Watch " cause groups in Austin. "

 

Full story at:

http://austin.indymedia.org/feature/display/26838/index.php

[Guest guest]

, Alobar <Alobar

wrote:

>

> Makes me wonder if this group is on the FBI's " terror watch " list?

>

> Alobar

>

 

 

Dear Alobar,

 

We aren't doing anything here but discussing and sharing information

that is readily available either from major media or authors on the

web.

 

For the most part, we are only posting what others have written and

are available for all to read on the net anyway. I haven't seen any of

those sources as " subversive " , but more of a difference of opinion. Is it now

" subversive " to read something? And if so, are there now lists of approved

reading materials and lists of disapproved reading materials?

 

We share alternative health and medicine information. We share many

other alternative news interests in other fields also. The main stream media is

readily available to all of us also on most major media channels. Is it wrong to

read alternatives too? Is there now only one way of thought and " no

alternatives " ? Are we not the land of the free....to read and think?

 

I have done nothing wrong and I will not be made to feel as though I have.

 

Frank

 

 

 

 

 

>

" In a guest lecture at the University of Texas School of Law on

> Wednesday, FBI Supervisory Senior

> Resident Agent G. Charles Rasner listed Indymedia, Food Not Bombs, and

> the Communist Party of Texas

> as " Terrorist Watch " cause groups in Austin. "

>

> Full story at:

> http://austin.indymedia.org/feature/display/26838/index.php

>

[Guest guest]

My goodness, Frank. Of course you have not done anything wrong.

But I'd be willing to bet that over 90% of the people on the FBI watch

list have nothing wrong either. Remember what Pastor Martin

Niemöller said in his poem about the nazis:

 

They came first for the Communists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

 

Then they came for the Jews,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

 

Then they came for the trade unionists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

 

Then they came for the Catholics,

and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

 

Then they came for me,

and by that time no one was left to speak up.

 

 

Alobar

 

 

On 3/14/06, califpacific <califpacific wrote:

> , Alobar <Alobar

> wrote:

> >

> > Makes me wonder if this group is on the FBI's " terror watch " list?

> >

> > Alobar

> >

>

>

> Dear Alobar,

>

> We aren't doing anything here but discussing and sharing information

> that is readily available either from major media or authors on the

> web.

>

> For the most part, we are only posting what others have written and

> are available for all to read on the net anyway. I haven't seen any of

> those sources as " subversive " , but more of a difference of opinion. Is it now

" subversive " to read something? And if so, are there now lists of approved

reading materials and lists of disapproved reading materials?

>

> We share alternative health and medicine information. We share many

> other alternative news interests in other fields also. The main stream media

is readily available to all of us also on most major media channels. Is it wrong

to read alternatives too? Is there now only one way of thought and " no

alternatives " ? Are we not the land of the free....to read and think?

>

> I have done nothing wrong and I will not be made to feel as though I have.

>

> Frank

>

>