Time for the True Story About 9/11

[Guest guest]

S

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:43:11 -0800 (PST)

An M.D. Writes: Time for the True Story About 9/11

 

 

 

 

 

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE WIDELY

 

 

In addition to the Scholars for 9/11 Truth, here is yet another

professional, a physician, who wants more answers about what happened

on 9/11.

 

The unequivocal demand by a large number of American citizens is going

to be what it takes to get a complete and thorough investigation into

the mass murder of nearly 3,000.

 

What we have been told so far does NOT add up. There are a multitude

of un-answered questions, still.

 

The fact that there has not been a satisfactory criminal investigation

into the mass murder of roughly 3,000 Americans is simply un-acceptable.

 

Please participate in the Scholars for 9/11 Truth Petition asking

Congress to release information for an investigation into 9/11.

 

In addition, please also contact your members of Congress (House and

Senate) as well as the media to do what the Doctor states: We must

now demand that a special prosecutor investigate these crimes.

 

Thank you.

 

Petition:

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/petition/

 

 

Cathy Garger

Associate Member

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org

 

March 11, 2006

 

Time for the true story about 9/11

 

document.write ( " " ) document.write ( " " )

by Matthew Hine, M.D., M.P.H.

 

 

http://www.opednews.com

 

The radical Bush Doctrine in foreign policy is founded on the official

story of 9/11. The administration used our fear of terrorism to sway

public opinion and justify its actions. We are slowly awakening to how

the Bush administration manipulated our support for its preemptive

invasion of Iraq, but most are still asleep.

 

According to a survey done by Stars and Stripes, 85% of our troops

believe they are in Iraq because of Saddam Hussein's involvement in

the attacks of 9/11/01. Much of the public believes the report of the

9/11 Commission provided a correct account of the events of that day.

These beliefs are based on a misunderstanding of the facts.

 

Saddam Hussein was not connected to the 9/11 attacks, and the 9/11

Commission's report is full of omissions and distortions. One of the

largest is that it did not mention Building 7. This building was not

hit by an aircraft, but it crumbled just the same. Evidence shows that

Building 7 was demolished by pre-positioned explosives.

 

The Presidential 9/11 Commission report was more political exculpation

than documentation of truth. It was subtitled " Final Report of the

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. " They

dismissed anything not fitting into that preconceived paradigm. There

was no mention of Building 7 or the anthrax attacks.

 

The reason Building 7 is not mentioned by the Commission is that it's

hard to explain how a terrorist attack could have included

pre-positioned explosives that brought down a 47 story concrete and

steel building.

 

Dr. Steven Jones, a physics professor from Brigham Young University

questions the official explanation of what happened at the World Trade

Center, thinking that the buildings were brought down by explosives.

He is a member of a group of academics called Scholars for 9/11 Truth,

calling for a fuller investigation of the collapses.

http://www.st911.org

 

The official government story is a conspiracy theory, namely that 19

hijackers conspired, under the guidance of a man in a cave, to defeat

the most sophisticated air defense system in the world.

 

The very day after 9/11, the media told us that the plot had been

hatched by Osama bin Laden, and soon the FBI showed us photos of the

19 hijackers. Several weeks later, many were puzzled by the BBC report

of the apparently fireproof passport of one of the hijackers, found on

a sidewalk several blocks from the Twin Towers. Some wondered whether

the document had been planted after the BBC reported at least four of

the nineteen hijackers had turned up alive and well in Saudi Arabia.

 

WTC 7's destruction was broadcast by CBS. Dan Rather, uncensored live

on 9/11, said it had the appearance of " A building deliberately

destroyed by well placed dynamite " . Real time videos and reports of

eyewitness testimony from reporters and fire fighters have surfaced,

demonstrating that a controlled demolition took place. These videos

and testimony are available at http://www.911truestory.com

 

Physical evidence including searing sub-basement temperatures and

sulfur from cutting charges, shows explosives were used to cut through

the core support columns below ground level.

 

The government's own investigators admit they have no reasonable

explanation for what happened to WTC 7. Alas, they did not consider

controlled demolition.

Regarding WTC7, the FEMA report states " Prior to September 11, 2001,

there was little, if any, record of fire-induced collapse of large

fire-protected steel buildings. "

 

If you dropped a steel beam from the top of the 47 story Building 7,

it would take about 6 seconds to hit the ground. WTC7 actually hit the

ground in about 7 seconds, at nearly free fall speed. If each

collapsing floor hit the floor below and paused for only 1/2 second,

the time to crumble into a pile only 2 stories high would have been

over 20 seconds. WTC7 had multiple steel core and perimeter support

columns. In order for it to be brought down into its own tight

footprint, all the core and perimeter columns would have to be broken

at essentially the same time. The only way this can happen is through

controlled demolition, using pre-positioned explosives. If WTC7 was

brought down by explosives, what happened to the Twin Towers?

 

In a gross misrepresentation, the 9/11 Commission explained their

version of the " pancake theory " collapse: The cores of the Twin Towers

were hollow, comprised only of stairwells and elevator shafts. In

truth, each of the Twin Towers contained dozens of solid central steel

support columns.

 

There is a widespread cultural taboo against noticing the inadequacy

of our government's explanations. This is because the implications are

too disturbing for

most to consider.

 

In March 2003, Dick Cheney summarized the myth used to justify the

Bush Doctrine: " We saw on 9/11 nineteen men hijack aircraft with

airline tickets and box cutters kill more than 3,000 Americans in a

couple of hours. "

 

Once the facts are widely known, future generations may point to

Cheney's statement as the Big Lie of our time. It fooled our citizens

into supporting actions they otherwise would have opposed.

 

Now is the time for a truly independent look at the evidence. It's

time for a special prosecutor.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress

people:

Support a resolution calling for a 9/11 special prosecutor.

 

For your ease, you can also contact Congress and your media here:

 

http://www.usalone.net/cgi-bin/oen.cgi?qnum=219

 

 

INY URL FOR ARTICLE: http://tinyurl.com/qored

 

article also found at:

 

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_matthew__060311_time_for_the_true_st.htm