Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Christianity in the United States to revolve around two basic premises; dislike, if not actual hatred of gay people, and elimination of women's reproductive choices. _________________**********______________ Somewhat simplistic and has the point has no added strength by caricature. The conservative orthodox camp felt homosexual marriage was not the same as heterosexual marriage, and that a fetus is more than simple tissue. I think the mainstream in these groups do not hate these folks at all, but some are immature in every camp, who use hyperbole and hostile passion, instead of reason. Should homosexuals have good health care? Of course. Should they be on perfectly equal footing with heterosexuals in adoption? That is the real debate. Should some gays adopt because they would be good parents-of course. Abortion debates now are strongly metaphysical and have nothing to do with science. It has to do with metaphysics/philosophy/ultimates. You think it is tissue or a life. You think it is a type of spiritual being or you see it as potential life. Lets just agree folks see different meanings in the painting. I hope folks who think it is mere tissue would fight for my liberty. I hope folks who think it is active real human life would fight for the life. Lets just accept what is 1970's stuff--folks just see two things. LETS GET BACK TO BUSH..... *Bush is very " confusing " to me. *As an orthodox Christian with 20 important issues in my mind, I am troubled as to why a perfectly good secret review of wiretaps which gave 99% approval to taps including after they are done, is not enough. As a poor Christian with many flaws, I do not trust the inner heart of any man (or woman) given unlimited power. One reason the founders were careful to balance the power of potential fools. *Also, as a Christian I am not excited about Euthanasia, but the DEA and " Justice " War on pain medications certainly makes it hard to say to a suffering arthritis victim, " No need to kill yourself, we will remove ALL your pain, " when 99% of MD's are terrified of the DEA, State Medical treatment " fashion " police, and the " Justice " Dept. *If we are not offering solid paying skilled jobs to our populace we are going to see the erosion of many things. I am not impressed that Bush understands the idea of economic warfare, fair negotiation, and job creation. *Why are our jails sadistic? We take folks with many medical and psychiatric issues and lock them up for 23 hours a day with 1960's medical care. *If you are addicted, we do not treat your addiction and train you to have a thrill at making or learning, we just sardine you. Jessie is right. When over 1 million folks are in jail and much is drugs related, we need to think the system over. But thinking and creativity is absent. I feel less free than any time in my life. *Why can I find new wonder medical treatments in most counties of the world, and I cannot even say an essential mineral is useful to treat a disease, without the wrath of the FDA superpower coming on me? *If I design a new formulation of a custom compounded medication, I have to deal with some pro-cancer making horse urine promoting corrupt pharmaceutical giant, getting the FDA to attack my master compounder, who is usually only doing what the drug companies copy in 5-50 years. Yep. Conservative Christians are rethinking many things. Thanks for the thoughts. While I might not agree with everything. I like reading about the preservation of liberty. I used to assume that was like a tattoo--set in stone. What a fool I was. Peace, James - califpacific Friday, March 03, 2006 5:25 PM Moderate Christians are Waking Up Fri, 3 Mar 2006 07:42:53 -0500 (EST) Moderate Christians are Waking Up S http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_thomas_l_060302_moderate_christians_.htm Original Article at http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_thomas_l_060302_moderate_christians_.htm March 2, 2006 MODERATE CHRISTIANS APPEAR TO HAVE AWAKENED By Thomas L. Walsh MODERATE CHRISTIANS APPEAR TO HAVE AWAKENED For several years now I've been wondering when moderate Christians would crank up the nerve to stand up against the Bush propaganda machine. There have been few cracks in the massive wall of conservative Christianity that the Bush machine has erected, hand-molded and hammered into a formidable political machine, primarily in the red states, and more specifically the south. Since its' inception, this administration has molded and re-defined Christianity in the United States to revolve around two basic premises; dislike, if not actual hatred of gay people, and elimination of women's reproductive choices. The Pat Robertsons, Jerry Falwells, Franklin Grahams and James Dobsons have hijacked religion in this country, hand-fitting it to achieve their sometimes-anything-but-Christian political ambitions, with the implicit help of the Bush administration, primarily through the machinations of Karl Rove. I sense things are a-changin,' and it's way past time that they did. At the end of February, 55 Catholic Democratic members of the House of Representatives finally had enough. In a Statement of Principles, signed by all of these members, they stated: " We are committed to making real the basic principals that are at the heart of Catholic social teaching: helping the poor and disadvantaged, protecting the most venerable amongst us, and ensuring that all Americans of every faith are given meaningful opportunities to share in the blessings of this great country.(which) includes reducing the rising rates of poverty; increasing access to education for all; pressing for increased access to health care; and taking serious the decision to go to war. " Back in 1960, while running for the presidency in a sea of anti-Catholic bigotry, John F. Kennedy told a group of protestant ministers in Houston, " I do not speak for my church on public matters---and the church does not speak for me. " Kennedy kept his word, and kept separation of church and state as a basic tenet of his foreshortened life. Our current president has done anything but that, and has continually attempted to, and often succeeded in blurring this long-respected separation, certainly to the advantage of his political career, and in opposition to the opinions of a majority of constitutional experts. Congresswoman Rose DeLauro of Connecticut, one of the signers of the new statement, was quoted as saying, " People.were angry that ideologues were using the church for their own purpose. " In addition, the signees succinctly and clearly addressed the most difficult issue, by stating that: " Each of us is committed to reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and creating an environment with policies that encourage pregnancies to be carried to term. We believe this includes promoting alternatives to abortion, such as adoption, and improving access to children's healthcare and child care. " Most significantly, Catholics from both side of the debate regarding choice signed the statement of principle. By doing so, they made a statement that they worry this one principle is crowding out all other principles of Catholic social teaching. The importance of this statement cannot be overemphasized. These people are saying that, while they certainly respect the teaching of their own faith, they recognize that there must be, there has to be room for primacy of conscience, as well as the freedom to use their intellect in dealing with subjects such as this. I could not agree more with their statement. While I happen to share their faith, I will always be unwilling to surrender my intellect to hard, inflexible dogma. It is crucial for a group of reasonable, moderate Catholic politicians to offset the extremity of such organizations as the Family Research Council, who recently commented, through FRC Vice-President Tom McClusky that, " Issues such as helping the poor, the death penalty, views on war.aren't tenets of the Catholic Church. " McClusky's comments were expressed in a Washington Post article on Ash Wednesday, March 1st. They seem particularly odd, in view of the fact that on the same day, Pope Benedict XVI, in his Lenten message, stated that: " It is quite impossible to separate the response to people's material and social needs from the fulfillment of the profound desires of their hearts. This has to be emphasized all the more in today's rapidly changing world, in which our responsibility towards the poor emerges with ever greater clarity and urgency. " Father Jim Hug, SJ, Director of the Center of Concern and a participant in the Catholic Alliance for the Common Good, said, " The Church's present leadership has been unequivocal in its condemnation of the death penalty in the U.S., and has repeatedly expressed grave moral concerns over the Iraq war.It's disappointing that Mr. McCluskey would use his position to suggest otherwise. " Sister Simone Campbell, SSS, and national coordinator for the Catholic social justice organization NETWORK, added, " We believe Mr. McCluskey is wrong. He's behind on 113 years of Catholic social teaching and 2000 years of gospel values. " -30- Authors Bio: The writer graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 1962 with a B.A. in Journalism/Communications. After serving a stint in the United States Marine Corps, he embarked on a successful 36-year sales/sales management career with 3M Company and Lanier Worldwide, culminating in retirement and relocation in 1999 from Southern California to Driggs, Idaho, in the Teton Valley. Walsh and his wife Wynne Ann work in the wintertime as alpine ski instructors at Grand Targhee Resort, west of Jackson Hole, Wyoming. He writes for several magazines, as well as a regular column in the Idaho Falls Post Register, the second largest paper in Idaho. Other interests include fly fishing, mountain hiking, backpacking, bicycling, motorcycling, and Irish culture and politics. The Walsh\'s have spent a considerable amount of time in Ireland over the last decade. He is currently in the process of finding a publisher for his first book, \ " Damnyankee\ " , a true story of the ditching of an American Navy bomber off the coast of Ireland in 1944, and the fate of the surviving crewmembers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.