Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 FOOD TECHNOLOGY RUN AMUCK http://www.newswithviews.com/Dean/carolyn35.htm Dr. Carolyn Dean, MD, ND and Elissa Meininger March 3, 2006 NewsWithViews.com Nothing symbolizes Western culture and advancement more than modern technology. I remember many years ago excitedly passing around my fax number as if it were magic to use telephone wires to transport photos and text instantly around the world. Now we have camera-cell phones, iPods, internet communications, bank cards, and in the not too distant future, chip implants that will take over all electronic functions in our life. The downside to electronic technology is barely even considered. The headaches and brain cancers from cell phones, our total loss of privacy, and rampant stress from being plugged in and accessible 24/7/365 are all very real results of its influence. When it comes to the rapid changes in food technology since WW II, I'll bet most people have never taken a moment to consider that the current state of our physical health is likely due to eating food that is no longer compatible with our physical bodies. Food technology came out of the need to store food for long periods of time as well as to package and ship food over a distance so that it wouldn't spoil. In simpler times, drying, salting, pickling, canning and freezing covered much of the food preservation process. Some of these methods actually have the ability to preserve nutritional value along with making sure the food is appetizing and edible. A longer shelf life for products also saves manufacturers countless dollars from waste as well as the ability to provide wider varieties of food than ever before. However, in recent years, as methods of processing food have become more sophisticated, these methods have incrementally diminished the quality of food. Anyone who has ever eaten a juicy, vine-ripe tomato fresh from their garden knows the rock-hard grocery-store version is a far cry from the real thing. Food, or that which passes for food, is now a commodity in a well-designed box, loaded with additives to make it look and taste edible and treated like any other commercial product with no regard to its ability to give us life or take it away and we wonder why we are a nation of chronically-ill people. Sad to say, food technology starts in the labs of the world's great chemical conglomerates before the first seed is planted on the farm and ends on the tip of our forks. In fact, it is very hard to escape from eating manipulated food. What Happened to Our Farms? Following is a quote from Kirkpatrick Sale who wrote in The Nation, June 5, 1995. " When U.S. industrialism turned to agriculture after World War II…it went at it with all that it had just learned on the battlefield, using tractors modeled on wartime tanks to cut up vast fields, crop- dusters modeled on wartime planes to spray poisons, and pesticides and herbicides developed from wartime chemical weapons and defoliants to destroy unwanted species. It was a war on the land, sweeping and sophisticated as modern mechanization can be, capable of depleting topsoil at the rate of 3 billion tons a year and water at the rate of 10 billion gallons a year. It could be no other way: If a nation like this beats its swords into plowshares, they will still be violent and deadly tools. " According to biochemist, Dr. Ross Hume Hall " Man can never be more than what he eats. " In his 1974 book, Food for Nought he wrote: Nourishment of the American populace has undergone a startling transformation since WW II. A highly individual system of growing and marketing food has been transformed into a gigantic, highly integrated service system in which the object is not to nourish or even to feed, but to force an ever-increasing consumption of fabricated products. Dr. Hall was concerned that " The transformation has gone unmarked by government agencies and learned bodies. " And that " The effects of the transformation do not lend themselves to traditional methods of scientific and social analysis. " Hall also said that " The energy crisis and food/population imbalance are issues that are flogged to justify greater intensification of a machinelike agricultural system, at a biological cost that mounts every year. " Presently there are about 2,500 pesticides, herbicides, and food additives used in the food industry. Reliable sources tell us that potatoes can be contaminated with up to 29 different pesticides. You can get more information on this type of abuse at The Organic Consumers Association www.organicconsumers.org. What about the Science of Nutrition? Back in the 1800s, life was not yet a packaged commodity and promoting world trade above all else was not the main focus of public policy and law. The growth of the natural health industry, in what was an unfettered free enterprise system at its best, showed a public desire to enjoy the quality and freshness of foods, and there was even a growing number of health-promoting specialty foods, food concentrates and herbal elixirs that represent the precursors of today's health food stores and dietary supplement industry. At the same time, the modern medical community, led by the American Medical Association, pooh-poohed the idea that diet and nutrition had anything to do with health. After all, with the discovery of germs and the adoption of the Louis Pasteur version of the " germ theory " that promised to save all mankind from all future diseases, once synthetic drugs had been developed to kill each and every one of them, the need to even give nutrition a second thought was dismissed. During the time this same unfettered free enterprise system allowed ordinary people to support the ever-growing nutrition industry, several colossal nutrition deficiency epidemics occurred. Almost laughable in retrospect, these epidemics are perfect examples of how the arrogance and ignorance of the germ-fixated modern medical community reacts, confronted with a national health crisis. The first crisis involved the many unexpected outbreaks of scurvy toward the end of the 19th Century. In 1898, the American Pediatric Association published a report that the growing scurvy epidemic among children was due to a bacteria-caused ptomaine poisoning. The fact that the scurvy issue had already been dealt with as a nutritional deficiency a century earlier not withstanding, fixation on germs blinded medical " experts " from using common sense. The new belief that scurvy was really an infectious disease also persisted during WW I and was used to explain why there was an outbreak of the disease among soldiers. Medical " experts " claimed that in unsanitary conditions it was lice that transmitted scurvy to the soldiers. When the truth became out, these scurvy outbreaks were found to be a lack of vitamin C, caused, in many cases, by drinking boiled milk in the process we call pasteurization, which was and still is being used to protect people from germs believed to be found in raw milk. Boiling milk destroys much of the nutritional value of milk including destroying the vitamin C in it. With so many people, particularly children, depending on milk as a main source of Vitamin C, the lack of it caused a deficiency. Another famous example of professional blindness to simple truths, are the now infamous pellagra epidemics that went on for over a century. So fixated on that old bugaboo…germs…. medical experts on both sides of the Atlantic were convinced that pellagra was caused by all manner of exposures to moldy corn, germ-infected sheep, and fungi- contaminated corn excreted by chickens, to name some of the more prominent theories. As the pellagra outbreaks persisted, particularly in the southern U.S., panic was everywhere. In some places, pellagra victims were put into isolation and there was talk of general quarantines. Medical teams at the now-venerated Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, the very model of the best in modern American medicine, were forbidden to even discuss any cases in hospital there. At the same time, a new theory of the cause of pellagra was emerging….pellagra was caused by airborne insects. Something drastic was needed to address this national crisis, so the federal government formed the Thompson-McFadden Commission to study the issue. After dismissing any dietary connections with the plague, and the suggestion that it was brought in by Italian immigrants, the official finding was that pellagra was caused by stable flies. However, there was one level-headed and obscure Public Health officer named Dr. Joseph Goldberger who went south and bothered to notice things with powers of observation untainted by germ theory mania. He visited the sick, either in rural areas or insane asylums, where many were now housed to isolate them. It was through this simple system of scientific inquiry and observation that he found his answer and announced it at a medical conference in 1915. Goldberger realized that pellegra was not an infectious disease; it was not caused by germs. What he observed was that every single victim of pellagra was a person who ate mostly corn but did not vary his or her diet with other foods. Goldberger came to this conclusion by simply noticing that, in the asylums, while all the inmates were sick, not one single worker in any insane asylum had pellagra and all of these people not only ate what the inmates ate but they also had varied diets which included nutrient-rich vegetables and meats. Goldberger's findings were rejected by the Thompson-McFadden Commission in 1915 and the germ-theory armies vehemently campaigned against such thinking claiming that his ideas were dangerous. While Goldberger continued to do experiments to prove his ideas until he died in 1930. However the epidemic disappeared not soon after thanks to better diets available by then and the isolation of niacin in the laboratory, the specific nutrient that was lacking in the diet –the true cause of pellagra. My book, The Miracle of Magnesium proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that magnesium deficiency can cause, trigger, or worsen 22 diseases including heart disease, osteoporosis, migraines, severe muscle cramps, high blood pressure, and elevated cholesterol. However, magnesium is either ignored or outright rejected by a medical establishment that promotes patented medications with innumerable side effects for all these conditions. The ongoing disconnect between food and life not only occurs in corporate food technology labs around the world but also in universities everywhere. When medical research started discovering vitamins, nutrition, such as modern medicine understands it, became a subset of biochemistry. By the 1950s, researchers thought they had discovered all the vitamins and, strange as this sounds, getting on with the real study of nutrition fell by the waysi Worse yet, while the scientific community could claim to have discovered vitamins, the FDA, with the help of the AMA, ratcheted up a campaign to get rid of what the FDA referred to as " nutritional nonsense " …or, whatever the FDA, the AMA or their backers disagreed with, a campaign that continues today, despite massive public support of nutritional health. Presently, nutrition may be regarded as a subspecialty of Internal Medicine, yet there is a whole medical specialty called Bariatrics (Weight Loss Management), which deals with the end result of poor nutrition! Clinical nutrition itself is not a medical specialty; it was given over to dieticians who develop those famous school lunches and hospital fare and who supply diets to people based on the four food groups and prescriptions from doctors who know very little about nutrition. For part 2 click below. FOOD TECHNOLOGY RUN AMUCK PART 2 of 2 Dr. Carolyn Dean, MD, ND and Elissa Meininger March 3, 2006 NewsWithViews.com Even the recently discovered vitamins such as coenzyme Q-10 aren't even regarded as such. Allopathic medicine files them under optional nutritional supplements and not the essential nutrients they really are. All vitamins and minerals are coenzymes and cofactors in the metabolic processes of the body. We are finding out more about them as they are depleted by drug therapies and poor diets. For example, statin drugs create a deficiency of coenzyme Q-10. And diets deficient in B vitamins and magnesium are responsible for elevating homocysteine, an amino acid that is a much greater marker for heart disease than cholesterol. Even gene expression is controlled by vitamins. For example, studies of genetically obese mice show that if those mice are given sufficient B vitamins in their diet they don't become obese—in a vitamin deficient diet they express their obesity. Even these few examples of nutritional imbalance are earth shattering and should receive BANNER HEADLINES. But there is no nutrition propaganda machine. Instead there is the commodification of our food and the PR that makes us all addicted to food laced with chemicals, fat, and sugar. The Failings of Science Science studies nature and natural law dissecting things into smaller and smaller bits. What it does not study is modern corporate food technology itself and its effects on the population. While the majority of our food dollar is spent on processed food and junk food, no research money is spent on finding out what this type of food does to the human body. We also have no idea of the effects on the nutrients in foods throughout the following stages of food modification: agricultural practices; harvesting methods; storage methods; and food processing, refining, packaging, and shipping. William Longgood who wrote " The Poisons in Your Food " in 1960 knew the extent of food fabrication long ago and is famous for the following quote: Virtually every bit of food you eat has been treated with some chemical somewhere along the line. Dyes, bleaches, emulsifiers, preservatives, flavors, buffers, noxious sprays, acidifiers, alkalizers, deodorants, moisteners, drying agents, gases, extenders, thickeners, disinfectants, fungicides, neutralizers, anticaking and antifoaming agents, conditioners, curers, hydrolizers, hydrogenators, and many others. These are the tools of the food technician…His alchemy can make stale food appear fresh, permit unsanitary practices, mask inferior quality, substitute nutritionally inferior or worthless chemicals for more costly ingredients. Sugar, Dairy, and Wheat These three commodities make up the most commonly eaten fast foods and junk foods on the market. Sugar in our bloodstreams is a mere 2 teaspoons, yet we compulsively imbibe sodas that contain 10 teaspoons in 12 ounces. Who knows how much sugar is lurking in the super gulp cups that you can barely hold! Dairy is no longer as safe as mother's milk and has a long list of charges against it, including triggering juvenile onset diabetes and cancer. Wheat has been hybrid to resist frost, pesticides, and herbicides and not to enhance nutrient content, yet it is eaten my most people several times a day in the form of toast, bagels, rolls, sandwiches, cakes, pies etc. Sugar versus Artificial Sweeteners Even worse than sugar, presently our " better living through chemistry " has us ingesting over 5,000 products with a chemical sweetener that produces formaldehyde when broken down at body temperature. It's called aspartame with the brand names of NutraSweet and Equal. Efforts in New Mexico to ban the substance have mounted an aspartame industry lobby attack equal to any war. Go to www.dorway.com for action alerts on how you can help ban this poison. What about Dairy? Cows are injected with Bovine Growth Hormone that is supposed to stimulate more milk production but instead produces cancer causing hormones and mastitis in the cows. Mastitis—or inflammation of the cow's udder, is treated with antibiotics even though cows are given these drugs as part of their daily regimen. Unfortunately, antibiotic resistance that produces fatal infections in the human population can be traced to the overuse of antibiotics in animals. You can go to www.notmilk.com and read Robert Cohen's assessment of the dangers of milk. But not before you read about the benefits of real milk at www.realmilk.com. The " real milk " proponents feel that organic milk from cows fed on grass provides valuable nutrients, which are lost in the process of pasteurization and homogenization and whatever else is done to milk in the highly mechanized dairy industry. Why Wheat? Wheat is grown on land stripped of minerals, hybrid and genetically engineered (GM) to withstand the environment that includes assault with deadly chemicals. All GM foods tested on animals show damage, yet we don't even know if the wheat we are eating is GM because the government does not require GM foods to be labeled. After harvest, wheat is stored in silos that can easily develop mold. In fact, many people who think they are allergic to wheat or have an overgrowth of yeast (see www.yeastconnection.com) may be allergic to mold in wheat or other grains. Wheat is milled to remove the nutritious wheat germ— because it goes rancid and reduces shelf life. After removing about 80% of all the vitamins and minerals from wheat, manufacturers boast that their products are " fortified " by tossing in a few milligrams of synthetic nutrients in a pretense of making the product healthier. The resulting white flour produced from wheat is then paired up with sugar and fat to produce expensive confections with packaging that costs more than the raw materials. Food and the WTO I began to study the World Trade Organization and Codex Alimentarius after the World Trade Center bombings. Codex is the WHO and UN organization that creates food and food supplement regulations for international trade. I was scheduled to fly to Toronto a few days after September 11th but had to go by car instead. I drove with a former government official and we shared concerns about access to food imports when borders are shut down during national emergencies. Meetings I had throughout the next week with government and NGO agencies about food safety confirmed my worst fears. There were people and agencies at the international level that were already laying out controls on our food supplies. Over the next several years I became involved with the health freedom movement and traveled to two Codex meetings. There I learned that food and food supplements are being manipulated by the WTO purely for the purposes of trade and decisions made have nothing to do with health or nutrition. The grave concern that many of us feel is that WTO trade agreements will block the free flow of quality food and food supplements –only making way for low quality standardized products. Such a battle already rages in the matter of GM foods. The WTO wants GM foods to be commercially available worldwide. However, the European Union (EU) has demonstrated great suspicion about the safety of GM foods and won't allow them to be sold in the EU. In May 2003 the United States, Canada, and Argentina filed GM food trade complaints to the WTO against the European Union (EU) for suspending the sale of GM foods since 1998. A ban on GM foods, as imposed in the EU, according to GM producers, is not " scientifically justified. " The WTO ruled on this complaint and cited the inability of science to justify that GM foods were significantly different from non-GM foods. The WTO issued its interim ruling on February 7, 2006, and found that the EU and six of its member states had violated international trade rules by barring entry to GM crops and foods. Global Implications of Codex The following may be a little difficult to grasp but prior to the filing of the GM trade complaints, an obscure international committee, the ad hoc Codex Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology, submitted reports to Codex in March 2002 and March 2003, recommending the adoption of four global guidelines it had drawn up regarding the acceptance of GM foods. They were adopted in July 2003 as new global standards. This paved the way for the legitimacy for the complaints and shows the power of Codex. The WTO ruling on GM foods is very recent—February 7, 2006, so we don't know yet what is actually going to happen. We are sitting on the edge of our seats wondering whether the EU will concede or will it say that the WTO is powerless to enforce such a ruling. If the EU faces off against the WTO, perhaps that will diminish its power and give us new hope in saving the food supplement industry. Only time will tell. The GM issue has been raging for decades and the evidence mounts every day that GM foods are unsafe for human consumption. To keep current of what is happening with GM foods, visit The Science in Society site at www.i-sis.org.uk. One of the founders of this organization is Dr. Mae Wan Ho, a traditional scientist who several years ago became a strong opponent of GM foods. Her most recent article on GM foods, Feb. 6, 2006, is called " Dozens Ill & Five Deaths in the Philippines. " In it she gives the most recent body count on GM foods that are being documented near GM corn fields in the Philippines. Dr. Wan-Ho lists the following " Damning Evidence Against the Safety of GM Food and Feed " in her well-referenced article. Pregnant female rats fed GM soya gave birth to severely stunted progeny and others in the litters that died within three weeks (see main article) GM-soya affected cells in the pancreas, liver and testes of young mice (see main article) Rats fed a Monsanto GM maize developed serious kidney and blood abnormalities Villagers in the south of the Philippines suffered mysterious illnesses when a Monsanto GM maize hybrid came into flower; antibodies to the Bt protein in the GM maize were found in the villagers, and there have been five unexplained deaths (see main article) A dozen cows died after eating a Syngenta GM maize and more in the herd had to be slaughtered due to mysterious illnesses Dr. Arpad Pusztai and colleagues found young rats fed GM potatoes were damaged in every organ system, including an increase in thickness of the stomach lining to twice that in controls [15] Scientists in Egypt found similar effects in mice fed another GM potato The US Food and Drug Administration had data dating back to early 1990s showing that rats fed GM tomatoes had developed small holes in their stomach Chickens fed Aventis' glufosinate-tolerant GM maize were twice as likely to die compared with controls New research demonstrated that a harmless protein in bean when transferred to pea caused inflammation in the lungs of mice and provoked reactions to other proteins in the diet ( " Transgenic pea that made mice ill, " this series) Since a high percentage of our produce is already contaminated with GM foods our best advice is to grow, shop, and eat organic foods. Support organic Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) and local organic farming. Join a CSA where you can buy a share in a local organic farm and receive regular deliveries of organic produce. www.csacenter.org. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.