Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

POPULIST AMERICAN SAYS US HIJACKED BY WASHINGTON CRIMINALS

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Populist American Says

US Hijacked By

Washington Criminals

 

 

By Greg Szymanski

3-3-6

 

 

Bill Gibbons is fed up to his ears with the criminals in Washington.

And he's proud to call himself a " Populist American, " not willing to

compromise his God-given rights of freedom and liberty in the face of

what he calls a fascist hijacking of his country and its

Constitution.

Gibbons is just another example of an average American do above

average things while trying desperately to alert his fellow citizens

of the neo con takeover before its too late.

And to try and get some action and in memory of his wife Betty who

died in 2004, Gibbons started an extensive gathering of material on

his web site at www.gnrevival.com as well as writing two books

entitled The American Gestapo and The New American Revolution.

" This is a real populist web site and we believe that God Almighty

is in command of all the earth, " said Gibbons. " We believe in less

government, war only in defense of our home and that nobody is above

the law. We are against unlimited immigration and believe that all

illegal immigrants should be deported immediately. "

Gibbons, who feels the Constitution and the very future of his

country is now at stake, recently wrote the following warning to the

American people, trying to wake them up before it's too late:

" Let us see if we have this straight: The U.S. Constitution is the

supreme law of the land and all federal elected politicians as well

as all federal bureaucrats take an oath to uphold the Constitution.

Are we right so far?

" Of course we are right, because we have a copy of the oath that

senators and congressmen take upon assuming office. Our elected

representatives and senators break the law, but we do not send them

to jail,

" Now what happens when these elected persons and bureaucrats do not

keep their word? Would I be right in assuming that they have broken

the law, because they did not obey the Constitution? If you will

remember, the federal government sent Martha Stewart to jail for

lying to federal investigators, which is not a crime.

" Ms Stewart was not under oath when she was supposed to have lied. I

say supposed to have lied, because the government never did prove

that she did lie. So, if a business woman like Martha Stewart can go

to jail for lying to federal investigators, would it not be right to

send congressmen and senators to jail for lying to the public by not

keeping their word to obey the Constitution?

" They certainly do lie when they swear to do one thing and do the

opposite. They take an oath to obey and support the Constitution, but

turn around and trash the Constitution every day. George Bush, the

highest elected official in the country said, " The Constitution is

just piece of paper and pays no attention to his oath of office.

Can anyone show me the difference in the two cases? I fail to see any

difference myself.

" With this thought in mind let us examine the facts for a few

minutes. The Constitution is the LAW and breaking any law is a crime.

Criminals are supposed to be in jail. Voting for legislation that is

directly opposed to the Constitution certainly is breaking the law.

We know that the justice department is anxious when it comes to

putting people in jail, whether they are guilty or not, or whether

they are elected officials or not. Congressman Jim Traficant,

democrat from Ohio, comes to mind. Anyone playing with a full deck

knows that Traficant was railroaded to prison because he was a " die-

hard Constitutionalists " .

" He always had the highest record concerning votes to uphold the

Constitution in congress or the senate. Jim is in jail, while the

worst violators of the Constitution, like Teddy Kennedy, are running

free in Washington. These two-faced lying hypocrites in the House of

Representatives had the gall to expel him from congress as being

undesirable. How could anyone vote to oust one of the few honest men

in congress as being undesirable and still look at their faces in the

mirror?

Article Ten of the Constitution is very clear and it does not take a

rocket scientist to know what it means: " The powers not delegated to

the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the

States, are reserved to the States respectively, OR TO THE PEOPLE. "

Do you have any problem understanding that amendment? Of course not,

lawyers did not write it. Allow me to throw this little antidote in

here. I was watching an old movie, where this black man's kid was

before the judge for the fourth time. The judge was browbeating the

poor old fellow, because he was thinking. Finally the old gentlemen

said, " Yo honor, I can't talk without thinking, I ain't no lawyer. "

" Everyone should read the Constitution, for it is a simple document.

If you did read it you would find that about 95-to99 % of all that

the federal government does is unconstitutional. Where does the

Constitution mention education, or aid to education, foreign aid,

social security, Medicare, aid to children, or any one of hundreds of

programs that the federal government is involved in? Any member of

congress that votes for federal aid to education or foreign aid is

breaking the law, which makes him a criminal and demands that he go

to jail with the rest of the criminals. Are we right so far, or are

we just being paranoid.

" Now comes this thought for you to consider: Ignorance of the law is

no excuse and any cop or judge will tell you that. If a congressman

or senator says they did not know that the Constitution is the law or

that they were breaking the law that is no excuse and they should

still go to the slammer with the rest of the criminals. There should

be a Committee on the Constitution in each house to see that no

legislation even reaches the floor that violates the Constitution.

" One final thought: The Bill of Rights is just that " A Bill of

Right " . We citizens have always had the rights; they were not given

to us by a benevolent government. The Bill of Rights was drafted to

see that the government does not violate these rights, which are

already ours. "

http://rense.com/general69/ppo.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...