Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Garrison Keillor: Impeach Bush

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

" Zepp " <zepp

Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:11:28 -0800

[Zepps_News] Keillor: Impeach Bush

 

 

 

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/03/01/keillor/

 

 

* Impeach Bush *

 

The man was lost and then he was found and now he's more lost than

ever -- and he's taking us into the darkness with him. It's time to

remove him.

 

By Garrison Keillor

 

 

March 1, 2006 | These are troubling times for all of us who love this

country, as surely we all do, even the satirists. You may poke fun at

your mother, but if she is belittled by others it burns your bacon. A

blowhard French journalist writes a book about America that is full of

arrogant stupidity, and you want to let the air out of him and mail him

home flat. You hear young people talk about America as if it's all over,

and you trust that this is only them talking tough. And then you read

the paper and realize the country is led by a man who isn't paying

attention, and you hope that somebody will poke him. Or put a sign on

his desk that says, " Try Much Harder. "

 

Do we need to impeach him to bring some focus to this man's life? The

man was lost and then he was found and now he's more lost than ever,

plus being blind.

 

The Feb. 27 issue of the New Yorker carries an article by Jane Mayer

about a loyal conservative Republican and U.S. Navy lawyer, Albert Mora,

and his resistance to the torture of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay. From

within the Pentagon bureaucracy, he did battle against Donald Rumsfeld

and John Yoo at the Justice Department and shadowy figures taking orders

from Dick (Gunner) Cheney, arguing America had ratified the Geneva

Convention that forbids cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of

prisoners, and so it has the force of law. They seemed to be arguing

that the president has the right to order prisoners to be tortured.

 

 

One such prisoner, Mohammed al-Qahtani, was held naked in isolation

under bright lights for months, threatened by dogs, subjected to

unbearable noise volumes, and otherwise abused, so that he begged to be

allowed to kill himself. When the Senate approved the Torture Convention

in 1994, it defined torture as an act " specifically intended to inflict

severe physical or mental pain or suffering. " Is the law a law or is it

a piece of toast?

 

Wiretap surveillance of Americans without a warrant? Great. Go for it.

How about turning over American ports to a country more closely tied to

9/11 than Saddam Hussein was? Fine by me. No problem. And what about the

war in Iraq? Hey, you're doing a heck of a job, Brownie. No need to

tweak a thing. And your blue button-down shirt -- it's you.

 

But torture is something else. When Americans start pulling people's

fingernails out with pliers and poking lighted cigarettes into their

palms, then we need to come back to basic values. Most people agree with

this, and in a democracy that puts the torturers in a delicate position.

They must make sure to destroy their e-mails and have subordinates who

will take the fall. Because it is impossible to keep torture secret. It

goes against the American grain and it eats at the conscience of even

the most disciplined, and in the end the truth will come out. It is

coming out now.

 

According to the leaders of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission, our country

is practically as vulnerable today as it was on 9/10. Our seaports are

wide open, our airspace is not secure except for the nation's capital,

and little has been done about securing the nuclear bomb materials lying

around in the world. They give the administration D's and F's in most

categories of defending against terrorist attack.

 

 

 

Our adventure in Iraq, at a cost of trillions, has brought that country

to the verge of civil war while earning us more enemies than ever

before. And tax money earmarked for security is being dumped into pork

barrel projects anywhere somebody wants their own SWAT team. Detonation

of a nuclear bomb within our borders -- pick any big city -- is a real

possibility, as much so now as five years ago. Meanwhile, many Democrats

have conceded the very subject of security and positioned themselves as

Guardians of Our Forests and Benefactors of Waifs and Owls, neglecting

the most basic job of government, which is to defend this country. We

might rather be comedians or daddies or tattoo artists or flamenco

dancers, but we must attend to first things.

 

The peaceful lagoon that is the White House is designed for the comfort

of a vulnerable man. Perfectly understandable, but not what is needed

now. The U.S. Constitution provides a simple ultimate way to hold him to

account for war crimes and the failure to attend to the country's

defense. Impeach him and let the Senate hear the evidence.

 

- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Garrison Keillor's " A Prairie Home Companion " can be heard Saturday

nights on public radio stations across the country.)

 

 

--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...