Guest guest Posted February 28, 2006 Report Share Posted February 28, 2006 A Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:24:53 EST The 7 stages of a dollar crisis http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/P72747.asp The 7 stages of a dollar crisis 'Experts' simplistically tout a weak dollar as good news. No wonder many regular folks are unaware that its dramatic decline could spell real trouble. By Bill Fleckenstein Along the way to a full-blown crisis, the steps leading up to it may either pass unnoticed or prompt insufficient concern. That is the story of the dollar. Its decline continues to strike many folks as good news. It is only a matter of time before that perception changes. The inevitable crisis will inflict damage, but those who see where we are headed can protect themselves beforehand. To this end, I'll explain where I believe we are in that process. G7's 'lingo limbo:' How low can the dollar go? Recently, the Group of Seven finance ministers met in Boca Raton, Fla., to hammer out a much-parsed currencies communiqué. Why folks take this exercise in semantics seriously beats me. The fact is, even the seven ministers, who are capable of speaking five languages, can't tell you what the heck they mean. Of course, one reason they can't tell you is that their differing agendas make it hard to pretend like they're all on the same page. That said, the foreign ministers probably agree on one point: The dollar is becoming a problem, which is why the gist of their communiqué stated that too much volatility (read: dollar weakness) is not a good thing. What we are witnessing is the unfolding of a dollar crisis. Though its external value seems to be a nebulous concept for many folks, as the dollar's ongoing decline builds to a crisis, it will have a significant impact on the workings of financial markets -- and affect everyone's financial well-being. (For review, please see my past columns: " The dollar's dramatic decline comes out of your wallet " ; " The dollar: linchpin to stocks and the economy " ; " Face up to the falling dollar " ; " Fantasy, the Fed and the falling dollar: Oh my! " ; and " The dollar is on borrowed time. " ) 7 small steps to crisis Here, then, is my outline of a 7-step process of creating a full-blown crisis. * Step 1. Nobody notices or pays attention that the dollar is falling. * Step 2. Folks wake up, but they either don't care or rationalize dollar weakness as a good thing. * Step 3. The central banks now know they have a problem, but the bankers think the market will obey them. It will, for a while. (This is the step we have now reached and what emerged at the G7 meeting.) * Step 4. The dollar now tests everyone's resolve by resuming its decline. The currency markets will not respond to jawboning by finance ministers. * Step 5. In this step, the finance ministers are forced to take action. (Think about it. Even if they'd stated that they wanted the dollar to go up, nothing either explicit or implied indicates they'll do anything about what's happening. That will come next.) When they do take action, the market will do what they want -- but only for a while. * Step 6. The ministers take some additional action, but it won't be enough, and the currency markets won't do what the ministers want. * Step 7. Finally, we'll have a full-blown crisis, and that will be the end game. Pssst, Economist: It's Al (Greenspan), not Asia To buttress my claim that we are segueing from the initial stages where no one cares to the next and dicier stages, I'd like to share a few quotes from " Let the dollar drop, " the lead editorial in last week's issue of The Economist. Though the writer first takes a why-worry attitude toward the decline, he seems to recognize that all this central-bank dithering can lead to real trouble. So, confusion of conclusions notwithstanding, it's worthwhile spending a minute on the article. Starting with the why-worry theme, the writer argues the nonsensical case that the dollar has, in fact, been too strong. (If that isn't an example of drinking 'em pretty, I don't know what is.) A weaker dollar, he says, " will help to reduce America's vast current-account deficit. " Well, I've got news for him. The dollar's slide of nearly 30% from the peak of its valuation two years ago to where it is now hasn't done a whole heck of a lot to reduce the imbalances. A further slide may help some, but it's not going to do a lot, either. So much of our manufacturing has been wiped out as we ship jobs to Asia that we're exporting less and less of what the world wants. Thus, it's kind of hard to fix all these problems simply by having the dollar collapse. Continuing on, the writer points out Asia as the problem, while missing the real issue -- incompetence and recklessness on the part of the Fed: " In the short term, " he says, " Asia might thus be seen as America's savior. But in the longer term, Asian governments are delaying a necessary adjustment by allowing America's deficit to loom large for longer. This is likely to lead to an even bigger and more dangerous build-up of American foreign debt. " That's all true, but this is exactly the same problem that has been precipitated by the Fed, in terms of trying to reflate the prior bubble -- and the horrendous outcome will be the same when this attempt at bubble-building in the housing and stock markets again unwinds. Vendor-financing a spending binge He then explains why Asia has done as it's done, by saying that it's " buying American Treasury bonds in order to ensure that Americans can afford to keep spending money on Asian goods. " That is, the Asians are vendor-financing our spending binge. And he then states the obvious: " This cannot go on forever, " and " sooner or later, Asia's central banks will have to face the fact that they are holding far too many risky, low-yielding dollars. . . . Delaying the natural adjustment in the dollar and bond yields is likely to mean that when the inevitable correction comes, it will be much more painful. " (The emphasis is mine.) Again, this is the same point that I just raised about the ultimate adjustments we still have not made from our prior stock mania. Next, the writer opines that, when the blame gets levied, Asia will be faulted for tinkering with its currencies, but further adds: " America must bear much of the blame for its failure to do anything to curb household and government borrowing, and so boost saving. Its easy monetary and fiscal policies are now beginning to look reckless. " Well, all I can say is, now beginning? It's been that way for a very long time. In 'Dollar Crisis, Act II,' Bofinger follows the 'script' To return to steps 3 and 4 of the process, I note that Peter Bofinger, a newly appointed member of the German panel of economic advisers, last Tuesday told Bloomberg News that what the G7 had done showed " indecision " about currencies. The ECB should have " acted more boldly " with respect to the euro. He therefore thinks that the dollar will continue to fall against the euro. If the dollar fell below .769, European exporters would experience difficulties. It was at .781 euros last week, or about $1.28 per euro. The problem would arise if the euro rose above $1.30. Meanwhile, as you can see, this particular fellow is talking about that stage of the evolution of the crisis where central bankers must, in fact, do something. He is criticizing the G7 for not having stated that they would do something. But, of course, as I just pointed out, arrogant central bankers first think it will be good enough simply to tell the market what to do. Only after that doesn't work will they decide to take some action. The interesting thing will be to see how long that takes to happen. The moral of the story is this: Ultimately, the adjustment to our bubbles is going to come. It's going to be very painful. And the pressure will in all likelihood be precipitated by the foreign exchange market, though other factors could certainly do it. To repeat my thoughts from the beginning of this discussion, we're in the middle stages of the process, and from here, the ride will only get hairier. Folks who understand the ongoing process of this decline will be in the best position to protect themselves from the ramifications as they unfold. Bill Fleckenstein is president of Fleckenstein Capital, which manages a hedge fund based in Seattle. He also writes a daily Market Rap column on his Fleckensteincapital.com site. His investment positions can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in Bill Fleckenstein's columns are his own and not necessarily those of CNBC on MSN Money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.