Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

GMW: LATIN AMERICA: Wanted - Labels for GMOs

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

GMW: LATIN AMERICA: Wanted - Labels for GMOs

" GM WATCH " <info

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:40:51 GMT

 

 

 

 

GM WATCH daily

http://www.gmwatch.org

---

 

 

LATIN AMERICA:

Wanted - Labels for Genetically Engineered Products

Diego Cevallos*

IPS - Inter Press Service News Agency, Feb 21 2006

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=32244

 

MEXICO CITY, Feb 21 (Tierramerica) - Labels on foods sold in Latin

American countries don't indicate whether they contain genetically

engineered ingredients. There is legislation on the books in Brazil,

but companies aren't complying with the requirement. In Mexico the

laws on the matter are imprecise, and in Chile a new law is expected soon.

 

Many of the foods consumed in the region do indeed contain

transgenics, in other words, ingredients that have been genetically

modified in some way, and science has not produced definitive answers

about their possible effects on health and the environment.

 

That is why defenders of consumers' rights believe labelling of foods

with genetically modified ingredients should be required.

 

More than 30 countries had adopted or planned legislation as of 2004

for requiring labels for transgenic products, according to a study by

the World Health Organisation (WHO).

 

A 2003 presidential decree in Brazil requires that all foods

containing more than one percent genetically modified ingredients must

bear a " T " inside a triangle. But shoppers have yet to see this symbol

on supermarket shelves.

 

" We Brazilians are consuming genetically modified products without

knowing it, " and the government " is irresponsibly omitting " its duty

of requiring the label, Paulo Pacini, attorney for the

non-governmental Brazilian Consumer Defence Institute, told Tierramerica.

 

In 2000, then-minister of health and current president-elect of Chile,

Michelle Bachelet, issued an order for obligatory labelling of

transgenics, but it was not enacted. She has pledged to resolve the

matter during her presidency, which begins Mar. 11.

 

A 2005 Mexican law on biosafety entails obligatory labels, to the

extent that the product involves transgenics whose nutritional content

is significantly different from other foods. Because the nutritional

value of genetically modified foods is generally the same as

conventional foods, lawmakers are seeking to modify the law so that

labelling occurs without considering the nutritional factor.

 

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were developed in the 1980s as a

means to improve certain characteristics of crops, such as appearance,

colour and yield, and resistance to pests or extreme climate

conditions or to specific pesticides.

 

The technique consists of introducing genes from another species --

which can be plant or animal -- into the seeds.

 

Activists, governments, agroindustry executives and scientists are

unable to agree on whether transgenics should be labelled, but most do

agree that consumers are likely to be wary of genetically modified foods.

 

In the European Union, where labelling is required, the consumer who

sees this alert tends not to buy the product. Several surveys

conducted in Latin America indicate that consumers in this region

would have a similar reaction.

 

In Brazil, 74 percent of those surveyed in 2001 by the Brazilian

Institute of Public Opinion and Statistics said they preferred

non-transgenic foods, while 73.9 percent of those consulted in 2004 by

the Institute Studies on Religion said GMOs " pose a risk " .

 

And in Chile, 58.5 percent of consumers prefer foods that have not

been genetically modified, according to a survey by Ipsos polling firm

in 2005.

 

In Mexico, the Sigma Dos pollster found that 98 percent of the people

consulted said they distrust transgenic products and that food

companies should inform consumers about whether they use them or not.

 

Environmentalists and some governments, such as the Europeans, call

for the cautionary principle when it comes to cultivating and

consuming GMOs, but farmers and many scientists assure that these

biotech products are harmless and should be used more widely.

 

According to a 2005 WHO report, it is unlikely that transgenic foods

already on the market pose risks to humans, although, in the future,

they could carry " potential direct threats for health and development. "

 

" There is certainty that foods derived from genetically modified

plants that are being marketed are as harmless as their conventional

counterparts. This is verified by 81 European research projects " and

the WHO, said Esteban Hopp, coordinator of the plant biotech unit of

the Argentine Institute of Biotechnology.

 

" Furthermore, from the more than 300 million hectares harvested and

processed for human and animal food so far, it is estimated that

globally more than 100 billion meals of high GMO content have been

consumed, without any consequences for health reported, " Hopp said in

a Tierramerica interview.

 

But there are documented examples of potentially dangerous genetically

modified foods. In the United States, the corn variety Starlink was

withdrawn from the market in 2000 after cases of allergic reactions by

consumers were reported.

 

And the transgenic corn variety Mon863, produced by the U.S.-based

Monsanto, an agroindustry giant, and authorised for human consumption

in Mexico, caused health problems in rats during experiments,

according to a confidential document from Monsanto that was made

public in 2005 by court order.

 

GMO cultivation has been expanding worldwide since 1996, when

commercialisation of these seeds began. From then through last year,

471 million hectares have been planted with transgenic crops,

according to the International Service for Acquisition of Agri-Biotech

Applications (ISAAA), a U.S. company that promotes transgenic crops.

 

The leading producers of these crops are the United States, Argentina,

Brazil and Canada, concentrated in soybeans resistant to certain

herbicides, and maize and cotton resistant to herbicides and insects.

Almost the entirety of the seeds for these crops are created and sold

by Monsanto.

 

In the international forums where the labelling question is being

discussed -- like the International Committee of Codex Alimentarius --

the United Sates, Argentina and other countries are resoundingly

opposed to any binding international rules on labelling requirements.

 

In May 2005 in Malaysia, during the last meeting of Codex, an agency

of the United Nations, the labelling debate ended in a stalemate, and

the parties to the discussion only agreed to take up the matter again

in the future.

 

" If there are companies and governments so sure that transgenics will

not produce secondary effects in the long term, why this resistance to

labelling? " wonders Aleri Carreon, coordinator of the consumers

campaign and genetic engineering for the environmental watchdog

Greenpeace-Mexico.

 

According to Argentine biotech expert Hopp, " the label should provide

information to the consumer, and not fear, nor should it lead to

political discrimination " against those who sell products derived from

GMOs, he said.

 

For the scientist, who believes organisations like Greenpeace are

" fundamentalists " when it comes to transgenics, if the food truly isn't

safe, it shouldn't be labelled -- it should be banned.

 

(* Diego Cevallos is an IPS correspondent. With reporting by Marcela

Valente in Argentina, Mario Osava in Brazil and Daniela Estrada in Chile.

Originally published Feb. 11 by Latin American newspapers that are

part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news

service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations

Development Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)

 

(

 

 

---------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...